Wasn't this processor originally 299.99? Why is it dropping like a rock?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...-849-_-Product
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...-849-_-Product
A pity that AM3+ mobos aren't around. It would make me upgrade to the 1090T if I knew that I could slap in a bulldozer in 18 months and keep the same ram/mobo
I see the 1055T is at 180 now. when it gets below 150 will be time for an upgrade.
I agree. That said, we don't know what Sandy Bridge is going to bring. I have a feeling that it's going to be very fast. AMD seems to struggle trying to compete at the high end lately. I would be very surprised to see Bulldozer outperform SB.A pity that AM3+ mobos aren't around. It would make me upgrade to the 1090T if I knew that I could slap in a bulldozer in 18 months and keep the same ram/mobo
I gota 1055t and MB at microcenter about 2 weeks ago for $189. I overclocked that 1055t on air to 3.5ghz and it still idles at 29c on the stock coller on air, in fact I am running stock voltage, just a multipler bump and a FSB tweak.
I kinda wish i went the amd rough, but i didn't...
Bulldozer was meant to compete with Nehalem back in 2009. Two years delay has people skeptical that it will still be able to compete favorably with Sandy Bridge. I think the biggest factor will be how well Global Foundry's 32nm process turns out compared to Intel's already mature 32nm process (and soon to be 22nm).
Bulldozer is starting today and will be much faster than Sandy Bridge ( exactly at the same way first Athlon was faster than PIII) , Bulldozer will be even with Ivy Bridge and will start loosing something later against the next architecture.
A pity that AM3+ mobos aren't around. It would make me upgrade to the 1090T if I knew that I could slap in a bulldozer in 18 months and keep the same ram/mobo
Which power supply do you have? It is my understanding that the 1055t (125W) sees a huge wattage jump when overclocked.
John
Actually the first 45nm try of bulldozer was never released by AMD , some work made for that cpu was used to convert Phenom1 in Phenom2 , the 32nm Bulldozer is target to compete at least against Ivy Bridge,
AMD have a much slower architectural change , current K10 architecture ( that is nothing more than a 64 bit K8 architecture) started back to the Pentium III , Pentium4 era , and did all the work until today.
Bulldozer is starting today and will be much faster than Sandy Bridge ( exactly at the same way first Athlon was faster than PIII) , Bulldozer will be even with Ivy Bridge and will start loosing something later against the next architecture.
For sure there will be some improvement in the future ( same as K8 evlving to K10) but buldozzer architecture must last for 10 or more years ( AMD don't have enougth money for a faster architecture development )
Is the 1100T a new stepping or a 95W TDP?
