hkchan - My "gripe" with PointClick hasn't solely been their increasingly restrictive TOS, but how they've implemented their TOS (unannounced changes hidden within various sections of their website), the continued poor operation of the website (although the amount of "down for maintenance" has been reduced considerably), failure to get-reimbursed (paid for what I have "earned"
😉 on a daily basis for 5-12 sites PER DAY, and failure to fully enforce the TOS (such as in allowing the 10-percent discount for purchases not made in accordance with the TOS - for which PointClick loses referral money on).
Look at how they "upped" the number of subcategories from roughly 40 to now over 70. Of those 30 new "subcategories" NONE actually contain ANY new/additional pointclick "Get-Reimbursed" sites, but you can bet that they're receiving banner-ad revenue for each banner that pops-up when you're searching those new subcategories for the "Get-Reimbursed" sites. Whereas before you could reach the daily maximum amount in under two (2) hours, now there's not even enough pointclick sites to reach the $5 daily maximum even if you're on PointClick ALL DAY LONG!
And how about the "Sign-up Bonus" program - has anyone actually received "credit" for the sign-ups they've done? I haven't. Now that you cannot earn $5 per day, it's impossible to track when they're actually paid, plus many of these are not credited until 4-6 weeks AFTER they're earned. That's one hell of a "float" period.
So what was the point in reducing the reimbursement period from 30 to 15 and just this past week, to 5 business days? When Pointclick changed the reimbursement period from 30 to 15 days on May 26th, I was immediately locked-out of a reimbursement for my prior purchase through Onvia.com that was less then 30-days on the 25th, but more than 15-days on the 26th. Pointclick effectively screwed me out of that reimbursement. Had they pre-announced the (upcoming) change in TOS, me and others could have submitted our reimbursement requests before this happened - but they've continually elected to simply employ new TOS without notifying the membership upon which they're ultimately dependent.
I agree that their prior daily maximum amount of $35 was "excessive" - but it was their choice to offer that incentive as a means of rapidly building a user-base, upon which they built their vendor-base (much as Paypal did before being purchased by X-dot-com). My bitch is with their website's failure to award *me* money for sites I've legitimately clicked-on within the TOS, and then to ignore my messages to that effect. It has been my experience that they've either ignored such messages in the past, or responded "....there's nothing [we] can do...."
Just look at their (PointClick's) terms of service under the upcoming "Sidewalk Shops" promotion to sign-up small businesses (
http://www.pointclick.com/sidewalk/signup/index.jsp). They're losing money because of how they're employing their business plan (Amazon.com business model), not because their (current) TOS is so out-of-line. Look at the advertising rate they're charging versus the "other" sites listed in their chart. Furthermore, this new "Sidewalk Shops" promotion is setting the stage for reducing the 10-percent "Get-Reimbursed" discount by setting-up a "side" program using a 5-percent rebate level. Based upon their past actions, I'd venture to say we'll see the 10-percent discount reduced to 5-percent for ALL purchases by the beginning of October, if not sooner.