10 Most "Harmful" books of the last 2 centuries.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Those two books caused revolutions, eh? It wasn't power-tripping egomaniacs who had other influences in their lives?
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Originally posted by: Genx87

Havent even got past #1 and #2 and I see two books that were written by people that caused revolutions which cost about 100 million lives in a single war and countless millions during peace.

I dont think you have to be a crazy rightie to agree with that.

You aren't one of those people that thinks guns kill people are you?
 

cwjerome

Diamond Member
Sep 30, 2004
4,346
26
81
You know how the saying goes "the pen is mightier than the sword?" Well an IDEA is mightier than the pen.


As far as the 10 books go, I can see how they spawned harmful ideas that led to bad things, although a few of them had *some* good parts also.

#7 I'm really not sure about.
 

imported_KirbsAw

Golden Member
Apr 23, 2004
1,472
1
0
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Martin
more precicely, a crazy rightie's idea of the 10 most harmful books...
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=7591

What we can learn from this is that women belong in the kitchen, FRD is the sole reason for the national debt, sex is evil, darwin is evil, nader is evil, secular humanism is very evil, and of course, Allah Akbar.

enjoy.


Havent even got past #1 and #2 and I see two books that were written by people that caused revolutions which cost about 100 million lives in a single war and countless millions during peace.

I dont think you have to be a crazy rightie to agree with that.

Then you blame the bible for the crusades, inquisition etc.?
 

Brute

Senior member
Apr 3, 2000
224
0
0
Equating Kinsey with Hitler is beyond assinine. Kinsey merely said what was happening while American prudishness denied and repressed it. Hitler sowed the seeds of genocide in that book of his.

Check out the movie "Kinsey." It's great. He didn't make a discovery like the guys who found DNA, he merely had the stones to ask the right questions first.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
There are a lot of potential book burners and banners here... pretty sad. Again, I'm guessing a lot of these people hold the "guns don't kill people" argument but have some sort of perverse double-standard for books.
 

cwjerome

Diamond Member
Sep 30, 2004
4,346
26
81
Originally posted by: Infohawk
There are a lot of potential book burners and banners here... pretty sad. Again, I'm guessing a lot of these people hold the "guns don't kill people" argument but have some sort of perverse double-standard for books.


Ugh. Leave it to you to imply that making a value-judgement on a book is a "gateway thought" to banning and burning :roll: :roll: :roll:

BTW, is that like saying a Liberal is the larval stage of a socialist? :D
 

stratman

Senior member
Oct 19, 2004
335
0
0
Originally posted by: Tango
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: Martin
more precicely, a crazy rightie's idea of the 10 most harmful books...
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=7591

What we can learn from this is that women belong in the kitchen, FRD is the sole reason for the national debt, sex is evil, darwin is evil, nader is evil, secular humanism is very evil, and of course, Allah Akbar.

enjoy.

Where is the Korean on that list?


1) It's not Korean. It's Koran, or even better Qur'an.
2) It was not written in the 20th or 19th century.
3) No book is dangerous.
4) No book is dangerous.
5) No book is dangerous.

Ooooooooooooooh, I was so confused for a bit :D
I was so shocked at his apparent racism towards koreans :p
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Ugh. Leave it to you to imply that making a value-judgement on a book is a "gateway thought" to banning and burning :roll: :roll: :roll:

BTW, is that like saying a Liberal is the larval stage of a socialist? :D

If you truly think books are dangerous, than you have a reason to burn or ban a book. If you are a liberal, that is not a reason to become a socialist. Nice try though.
 

Martin

Lifer
Jan 15, 2000
29,178
1
81
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Martin
more precicely, a crazy rightie's idea of the 10 most harmful books...
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=7591

What we can learn from this is that women belong in the kitchen, FRD is the sole reason for the national debt, sex is evil, darwin is evil, nader is evil, secular humanism is very evil, and of course, Allah Akbar.

enjoy.


Havent even got past #1 and #2 and I see two books that were written by people that caused revolutions which cost about 100 million lives in a single war and countless millions during peace.

I dont think you have to be a crazy rightie to agree with that.

After you got through #1, did you happen to read Animal Farm?
 

Martin

Lifer
Jan 15, 2000
29,178
1
81
Originally posted by: cwjerome
You know how the saying goes "the pen is mightier than the sword?" Well an IDEA is mightier than the pen.

As far as the 10 books go, I can see how they spawned harmful ideas that led to bad things, although a few of them had *some* good parts also.

#7 I'm really not sure about.

You mean, kinda like the Principia Mathematica led to the ability to build mechanized war machines which led to said millions of deaths? There have always been tyrants, what made stalin and hitler worse was their ability to kill so much.

Damn that evil Newton!
 

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
Why didn't "The Contract with America" make the list? It seems pretty dangerous in my eyes. Was able to fool millions into thinking that a power-hungry group was really looking out for their best interests to gain control of their government and make changes that are slowly destroying the fabric of their great country.
 

outriding

Diamond Member
Feb 20, 2002
4,504
3,946
136
His views had great influence on the direction of American education--particularly in public schools--and helped nurture the Clinton generation.

Did anyone else catch that in #5 ???

WTF is that suspose to mean ?
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
Originally posted by: outriding
His views had great influence on the direction of American education--particularly in public schools--and helped nurture the Clinton generation.

Did anyone else catch that in #5 ???

WTF is that suspose to mean ?

yeah... I read that, nr 5 definetly should not be on the list
He signed the Humanist Manifesto and rejected traditional religion and moral absolutes
and if the guys who made the list might read what secular humanism is they might not disagree, but that required research so I guess that was something that was too hard
http://www.secularhumanism.org/intro/what.html

I think over 50% of the people on AT could classify them as seccular humainists
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
hell nr8 should again, not belong on any list like that ... or 7 or 9


ok wtf is wrong with these people??
 

outriding

Diamond Member
Feb 20, 2002
4,504
3,946
136
Originally posted by: Czar
hell nr8 should again, not belong on any list like that ... or 7 or 9


ok wtf is wrong with these people??

Yea they are giving book burners a bad name

 

cquark

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,741
0
0
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: Martin
more precicely, a crazy rightie's idea of the 10 most harmful books...
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=7591

What we can learn from this is that women belong in the kitchen, FRD is the sole reason for the national debt, sex is evil, darwin is evil, nader is evil, secular humanism is very evil, and of course, Allah Akbar.

enjoy.

Where is the Korean on that list? Also notice that most of the authors or books have German Names (Nazi).

The list is limited to books from the 19th and 20th centuries.
 

cquark

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,741
0
0
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Martin
more precicely, a crazy rightie's idea of the 10 most harmful books...
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=7591

What we can learn from this is that women belong in the kitchen, FRD is the sole reason for the national debt, sex is evil, darwin is evil, nader is evil, secular humanism is very evil, and of course, Allah Akbar.

enjoy.


Havent even got past #1 and #2 and I see two books that were written by people that caused revolutions which cost about 100 million lives in a single war and countless millions during peace.

I dont think you have to be a crazy rightie to agree with that.

I wouldn't call the first three crazy choices, but putting Kinsey at #4 is crazy as is The Feminine Mystique at #7. Looking past their top 10, we see John Stuart Mill's On Liberty, a couple of Darwin's books, and a number of other crazy choices too.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: cquark
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Martin
more precicely, a crazy rightie's idea of the 10 most harmful books...
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=7591

What we can learn from this is that women belong in the kitchen, FRD is the sole reason for the national debt, sex is evil, darwin is evil, nader is evil, secular humanism is very evil, and of course, Allah Akbar.

enjoy.


Havent even got past #1 and #2 and I see two books that were written by people that caused revolutions which cost about 100 million lives in a single war and countless millions during peace.

I dont think you have to be a crazy rightie to agree with that.

I wouldn't call the first three crazy choices, but putting Kinsey at #4 is crazy as is The Feminine Mystique at #7. Looking past their top 10, we see John Stuart Mill's On Liberty, a couple of Darwin's books, and a number of other crazy choices too.


Heh like I said I only looked at the first two :)


 

Forsythe

Platinum Member
May 2, 2004
2,825
0
0
Originally posted by: cwjerome
Originally posted by: Infohawk
There are a lot of potential book burners and banners here... pretty sad. Again, I'm guessing a lot of these people hold the "guns don't kill people" argument but have some sort of perverse double-standard for books.


Ugh. Leave it to you to imply that making a value-judgement on a book is a "gateway thought" to banning and burning :roll: :roll: :roll:

BTW, is that like saying a Liberal is the larval stage of a socialist? :D

The liberal is the larval stage of the conservative.
 

Dissipate

Diamond Member
Jan 17, 2004
6,815
0
0
Marx theorized that the inevitable eventual outcome would be global proletarian revolution. He could not have predicted 21st Century America: a free, affluent society based on capitalism and representative government that people the world over envy and seek to emulate.

A free society based on capitalism and representative government? Bwahahahahahaha. This guy is a fool. I'd like him to explain how and why we have the IRS and the Federal Reserve.