10 Cars that can last to 200k Miles

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,198
126
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: senseamp
Consumer Reports' "Good bets" for making 200,000 miles: Honda Civic, Honda CR-V, Honda Element, Lexus ES, Lexus LS, Toyota 4Runner, Toyota Highlander, Toyota Land Cruiser, Toyota Prius, Toyota RAV4

So basically, all the cars I would get bored of after 20K miles and wouldn't want to drive for 200K miles in the first place.
I may consider keeping an MX-5 or a G35 coupe for 200K miles, and they are also good bets to make it there.

Thats why they last 200k miles, because they are just used for transportation and not beat to shit ;)

It's the same thing with the urban legend about the slant 6 being indestructible (compared to a V8). That wasn't necessarily the case, it wasn't really built any more special, it was just the nature that the people buying the slant 6 were not performance oriented people. As a result they expect much less and didn't beat their cars on a regular basis wringing performance out of them like someone with a V8 would.

Which makes me wonder why the Camry isn't on there. The Accord I can understand, it's popular and sleek and sporty enough for teens to want and pretend to race and rag on the car. But something like the Camry is an anonymous boring car that you find old ladies driving who never shift past 2000 RPM for 200k miles, compared to a sporty stylish Accord driven by some teenager that takes it to 9 grand at every shift.

You really have to look at the target markets for the cars when considering the reliability ratings. Someone who is cheap and/or lazy who buys a Neon or Corolla for $2000 and waits until the oil light comes on to change the oil and sees the car as a temporary and disposable thing isn't going to take as good care of their car as someone who just spent $40,000 on their Lexus pride and joy. Also the related demographics: that Lexus is most likely going to be in a garage and taken to the best mechanics and that Geo is going to be parked outside in the weather at an apartment complex and taken to Jose's Bondo Shop to be maintained as cheaply as possible.

With the exception of the Civic, most of the vehicles on that list are somewhat upscale, in the $25,000+ range, compared to some of the models that didn't make the list. The MSRP on the Land Cruiser is $56,215.

Camry prolly didn't make it because of the sludge :)
Oh yeah, Camry isn't rated all that highly by CR lately.
 

evident

Lifer
Apr 5, 2005
12,153
774
126
Originally posted by: bigdog1218
Originally posted by: steppinthrax
Somehow I knew before i clicked on that link all of those cars would be either (toyota, Honda, Nissan). And not to my surprise that is the case.

A big hoot for Toyota :thumbsup:

Why do people still think Nissan makes quality cars? I see 3 Nissan brands in the bad car list and zero on the good. It's a crappy brand that relies on "It's Japanese so it's reliable"

We have an 88 nissan stanza w/ over 200k miles on it and had no major repairs whatsoever...
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: Ktulu
Originally posted by: 996GT2
192,000 Miles on a 96 Accord and still runs like it just came off the showroom floor. Sound both mechanically and cosmetically with the exception of a very small (think pencil eraser) rust spot beginning to develop in the quarter panel areas from not being garaged in the first 5 or 6 years of its life...but that's relatively common in Hondas.

I was surprised to see that neither the Camry or the Accord made it on the list...not exactly sure why it is either

And KTulu, not all cars will last 200k Miles...even quality Japanese cars won't make it much over 200k if not meticulously cared for. For example, one of my friends' Camry recently blew its engine at 210k ish (terrible sight with stuf leaking everywhere)...now he's driving an 07 Pilot.

Never said all cars would last 200k. Please read my post more carefully.

You said "So because you're Neon and possible some other's you've "heard of" didn't make it to 200k automatically means none will, that's ridiculous."

The bolded part is a disastrously incorrect misinterpretation of what I've said, and the definition of a 'straw-man' argument. Basically, you tell someone that they said something other than what they actually did, and then tear it down because it's false. The only thing this does is make you look retarded.

Look at my post, I said that Neons are in general very unreliable. It's a well-known fact, there are tons of well-documented problems, especially with the head gaskets. I further backed this up with my personal experience. I never said at any point that 'none will' make it to 200k. I said that it's generally unlikely, I went through a head gasket in the first 35k miles, and the head itself cracked at around 70k. Car was worth less than the cost it would take to repair.

The fact is that with good maintenance (regular oil changes, plugs/wires, driving conservatively, always making sure the cooling system is operating properly, etc) many models have a good chance of making 200k. But to say anywhere near 'ALL models' are likely to do so with any regularity is grossly ignorant. My Neon was dealer maintained, all recommended maintenance followed, and still died pathetically early. I didn't hotrod it either (it's a Neon FFS), but it probably wouldn't have made much difference. It was just a lemon. This is why some car makes/models have better reputations than others. Even certain engines within the same make/model. Research pays off when buying a car. My decision to jump on a Neon was a quick one, I needed something new and cheap with a warranty, and the closeout price on it was dirt cheap. In retrospect I should have just got a used example of a better model vehicle. Since that time I have used a plethora of resources to examine all aspects of my auto purchases, and have gotten along pretty well. I've had 3 Hondas that went way into the 200k mark, and one that broke 300k, and sold them all in perfect working order on the original motor (with nothing done to the motor other than timing belts!). Now I'm on a Buick with nearly 200k, thanks to the loyal 3800 motor. The GM 2.8/3.1 V6s are notoriously unpredictable about when they'll die, but the 3800 is about as solid as they come.

Bleh. Anyway, you get the picture. And never underestimate the power of availability to determine vehicle longevity. Example, Ford probably sold nearly as many Tauruses in 1995 as Honda sold Accords, but look online for used examples of each type. You're lucky to find 1 1995 Taurus for every 10 1995 Accords available. And the Tauruses that are alive are usually (A)- on the 2nd motor, (B)- with less than 150k miles, (C)- about to die, or (D)- all of the above. The 95 Accords you see are usually toting 150-250k miles, still running strong. This may be a little extreme, because Tauruses were never known to be champs in longevity (on average), but the point is clear :

If model X and model Y sold ~1,000,000 units each in a given year, and model X is now difficult to locate on the used market, but model Y is widely available even with substantial usage, it probably says something about model Y's mechanical & engineering advantages to model X.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: senseamp
Consumer Reports' "Good bets" for making 200,000 miles: Honda Civic, Honda CR-V, Honda Element, Lexus ES, Lexus LS, Toyota 4Runner, Toyota Highlander, Toyota Land Cruiser, Toyota Prius, Toyota RAV4

So basically, all the cars I would get bored of after 20K miles and wouldn't want to drive for 200K miles in the first place.
I may consider keeping an MX-5 or a G35 coupe for 200K miles, and they are also good bets to make it there.

Thats why they last 200k miles, because they are just used for transportation and not beat to shit ;)

I beat the hell out of my Preludes and they both lasted into the 200k range until I sold them (parted out one wrecked one, but it's motor/tranny were both fine). Original motors, original seals/gaskets, no compression/gasket problems ever. One was gen 3, one was gen 5, so two totally different motors, ten years apart, and both nearly indestructible (pushing to nearly 8k rpm in 1st and 2nd, downshifting to 2nd @ 50mph, stuck in bumper to bumper Texas traffic & heat for hours on end). The Gen 5 even withstood about 70k miles of being force fed by a Jackson supercharger with no complaints.

 

Ktulu

Diamond Member
Dec 16, 2000
4,354
0
0
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: Ktulu
Originally posted by: 996GT2
192,000 Miles on a 96 Accord and still runs like it just came off the showroom floor. Sound both mechanically and cosmetically with the exception of a very small (think pencil eraser) rust spot beginning to develop in the quarter panel areas from not being garaged in the first 5 or 6 years of its life...but that's relatively common in Hondas.

I was surprised to see that neither the Camry or the Accord made it on the list...not exactly sure why it is either

And KTulu, not all cars will last 200k Miles...even quality Japanese cars won't make it much over 200k if not meticulously cared for. For example, one of my friends' Camry recently blew its engine at 210k ish (terrible sight with stuf leaking everywhere)...now he's driving an 07 Pilot.

Never said all cars would last 200k. Please read my post more carefully.

blah blah blah

 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: Ktulu
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: Ktulu
Originally posted by: 996GT2
192,000 Miles on a 96 Accord and still runs like it just came off the showroom floor. Sound both mechanically and cosmetically with the exception of a very small (think pencil eraser) rust spot beginning to develop in the quarter panel areas from not being garaged in the first 5 or 6 years of its life...but that's relatively common in Hondas.

I was surprised to see that neither the Camry or the Accord made it on the list...not exactly sure why it is either

And KTulu, not all cars will last 200k Miles...even quality Japanese cars won't make it much over 200k if not meticulously cared for. For example, one of my friends' Camry recently blew its engine at 210k ish (terrible sight with stuf leaking everywhere)...now he's driving an 07 Pilot.

Never said all cars would last 200k. Please read my post more carefully.

blah blah blah

Well that was an informative and relevant post :roll:
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: senseamp
Consumer Reports' "Good bets" for making 200,000 miles: Honda Civic, Honda CR-V, Honda Element, Lexus ES, Lexus LS, Toyota 4Runner, Toyota Highlander, Toyota Land Cruiser, Toyota Prius, Toyota RAV4

So basically, all the cars I would get bored of after 20K miles and wouldn't want to drive for 200K miles in the first place.
I may consider keeping an MX-5 or a G35 coupe for 200K miles, and they are also good bets to make it there.

Thats why they last 200k miles, because they are just used for transportation and not beat to shit ;)

I beat the hell out of my Preludes and they both lasted into the 200k range until I sold them (parted out one wrecked one, but it's motor/tranny were both fine). Original motors, original seals/gaskets, no compression/gasket problems ever. One was gen 3, one was gen 5, so two totally different motors, ten years apart, and both nearly indestructible (pushing to nearly 8k rpm in 1st and 2nd, downshifting to 2nd @ 50mph, stuck in bumper to bumper Texas traffic & heat for hours on end). The Gen 5 even withstood about 70k miles of being force fed by a Jackson supercharger with no complaints.

Always exceptions. Your cars might have lasted until 300k miles instead of 200k had you not beat on them ;)

I'm surprised about the seals though. What kind of climate does Texas generally have? Things like CV boots and oil/main seals don't last long in dry dusty Arizona no matter what the brand. Most cars here usually develop the slightest oil/PS/etc leaks from hardened seals somewhere between 100k to 150k, esp those not garaged.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: senseamp
Consumer Reports' "Good bets" for making 200,000 miles: Honda Civic, Honda CR-V, Honda Element, Lexus ES, Lexus LS, Toyota 4Runner, Toyota Highlander, Toyota Land Cruiser, Toyota Prius, Toyota RAV4

So basically, all the cars I would get bored of after 20K miles and wouldn't want to drive for 200K miles in the first place.
I may consider keeping an MX-5 or a G35 coupe for 200K miles, and they are also good bets to make it there.

Thats why they last 200k miles, because they are just used for transportation and not beat to shit ;)

I beat the hell out of my Preludes and they both lasted into the 200k range until I sold them (parted out one wrecked one, but it's motor/tranny were both fine). Original motors, original seals/gaskets, no compression/gasket problems ever. One was gen 3, one was gen 5, so two totally different motors, ten years apart, and both nearly indestructible (pushing to nearly 8k rpm in 1st and 2nd, downshifting to 2nd @ 50mph, stuck in bumper to bumper Texas traffic & heat for hours on end). The Gen 5 even withstood about 70k miles of being force fed by a Jackson supercharger with no complaints.

Always exceptions. Your cars might have lasted until 300k miles instead of 200k had you not beat on them ;)

Who knows :) When I sold them they were still running strong :D , and the Gen 5 was repairable (shattered carbon fibre hood, dented bumper, minor frame damage, driver's side front windshield pillar dented in, shattered front windshield, dented driver's door, etc.
 

Ktulu

Diamond Member
Dec 16, 2000
4,354
0
0
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: Ktulu
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: Ktulu
Originally posted by: 996GT2
192,000 Miles on a 96 Accord and still runs like it just came off the showroom floor. Sound both mechanically and cosmetically with the exception of a very small (think pencil eraser) rust spot beginning to develop in the quarter panel areas from not being garaged in the first 5 or 6 years of its life...but that's relatively common in Hondas.

I was surprised to see that neither the Camry or the Accord made it on the list...not exactly sure why it is either

And KTulu, not all cars will last 200k Miles...even quality Japanese cars won't make it much over 200k if not meticulously cared for. For example, one of my friends' Camry recently blew its engine at 210k ish (terrible sight with stuf leaking everywhere)...now he's driving an 07 Pilot.

Never said all cars would last 200k. Please read my post more carefully.

blah blah blah

Well that was an informative and relevant post :roll:

Your post wasn't really relevant either, considering you're revering to previous generations of American cars that weren't as reliable as they are today (but could still meet and excede 200k).

Here's what matters: If you compare American and foreign today, how do you think American cars stack up honestly?
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Originally posted by: Ktulu
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: Ktulu
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: Ktulu
Originally posted by: 996GT2
192,000 Miles on a 96 Accord and still runs like it just came off the showroom floor. Sound both mechanically and cosmetically with the exception of a very small (think pencil eraser) rust spot beginning to develop in the quarter panel areas from not being garaged in the first 5 or 6 years of its life...but that's relatively common in Hondas.

I was surprised to see that neither the Camry or the Accord made it on the list...not exactly sure why it is either

And KTulu, not all cars will last 200k Miles...even quality Japanese cars won't make it much over 200k if not meticulously cared for. For example, one of my friends' Camry recently blew its engine at 210k ish (terrible sight with stuf leaking everywhere)...now he's driving an 07 Pilot.

Never said all cars would last 200k. Please read my post more carefully.

blah blah blah

Well that was an informative and relevant post :roll:

Your post wasn't really relevant either, considering you're revering to previous generations of American cars that weren't as reliable as they are today (but could still meet and excede 200k).

Here's what matters: If you compare American and foreign today, how do you think American cars stack up honestly?

My parents have a '79 Dodge truck with a 2 barrel 318 and it's got well over 200,000 miles on it. It's used to haul bikes, car trailers, just about everything, and it never needs anything other than oil changes.

Oh, the fuel pump is weak and it bucks under heavy load, but thats to be expected from a mechanical pump with a reciprocating membrane that is that many years old. An electric pump is waiting to go on as soon as needed.

My '03 Cobra has 40k miles and the oil in it is clear enough to bottle and resale between changes. Zero issues, but that one I do baby to the point of changing the fuel filter every year or 15,000 miles.

But then I never have much trouble with any of my cars, foreign or domestic. Too many variables to judge a car's reliability on someone else's experience.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: Ktulu
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: Ktulu
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: Ktulu
Originally posted by: 996GT2
192,000 Miles on a 96 Accord and still runs like it just came off the showroom floor. Sound both mechanically and cosmetically with the exception of a very small (think pencil eraser) rust spot beginning to develop in the quarter panel areas from not being garaged in the first 5 or 6 years of its life...but that's relatively common in Hondas.

I was surprised to see that neither the Camry or the Accord made it on the list...not exactly sure why it is either

And KTulu, not all cars will last 200k Miles...even quality Japanese cars won't make it much over 200k if not meticulously cared for. For example, one of my friends' Camry recently blew its engine at 210k ish (terrible sight with stuf leaking everywhere)...now he's driving an 07 Pilot.

Never said all cars would last 200k. Please read my post more carefully.

blah blah blah

Well that was an informative and relevant post :roll:

Your post wasn't really relevant either, considering you're revering to previous generations of American cars that weren't as reliable as they are today (but could still meet and excede 200k).

Here's what matters: If you compare American and foreign today, how do you think American cars stack up honestly?

I was going by vehicles that are 10-12 years old and are much more likely to have 200k on the clock by now. Some US models have improved, some have not. You really have to look model by model, engine by engine, to get a feel for what's good and what's not.

I think that you have, and this is my best educated OPINION obviously, and averaged so that one lemon doesn't skew the whole paradigm :

Top Tier : Honda/Acura, Toyota/Lexus
Better than Average : Nissan/Infiniti, GM, Volvo
Average : Ford, Hyundai, Mazda, VW, Mercedes, Suzuki, Saab
Worse than Average : Audi, BMW
Terrible : Mitsubishi, Dodge
 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
Consumer Reports is full of it.

I think the large Nissans (Titan & Armada) would pull 200K pretty easily...

 

TheSlamma

Diamond Member
Sep 6, 2005
7,625
5
81
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
"take care of" means different things for different cars, though. for a Ford Windstar, it might mean 4 new transmissions, 2 new engines, etc. for a civic, it might mean new brake pads, a distributor cap, and oil changes.
Any Toyota with an A340E tranny means 4 tranny's thats for sure.
 

alimoalem

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2005
4,025
0
0
here's our experience with cars...

(84?) celica....sold when i was like 4 or 5 years old ('91 i think) but iirc it had around 150k and was running fine.
1990 camry went to like 220k
mid-90's nissan maxima. don't know the mileage but one day when my dad was at work for a few hours, a coworker came to him and told him his car was on fire. it was.
2001 sienna: 15xxxx miles, going strong. first car i've driven in our household. no one in their right mind can say this car hasn't been beat to shit and still it's going strong.
1997 mazda protege: ~210k miles. bought salvage title in '99, been through 3 major accidents, has gone through a world of hurt, used to teach 6+ newly licensed drivers to drive stick, raced (yes, believe it) and so much more. gets like no maintenance done on it. most recent costly thing was a new clutch at 160k (it was on the factory clutch til then). needless to say, this car has amazed me.
 

widefault

Senior member
Apr 28, 2001
930
0
0
1990 Lumina APC minivan - Bought with 177,000 for $400. Drove it for two years, fixing the front suspension, changing a dripping oil sensor, and new tires. Sold at 198,000 to my cousin after the radiator sprung a leak and the exhaust fell off. Just wasn't worth fixing, bought something else. He fixed it and sold it to someone else. Last I saw it was at about 210,000 and still wasn't using any oil. Ugly as sin, but I couldn't kill it and the new owner hasn't been able to, either.

Growing up my folks had a 1969 Chevy Nomad(Chevelle) station wagon that went up to around 188,000 miles on a 235ci straight six with an automatic. The traded it in in the late 80's and got more in trade than they had paid for it in 1974. Only got rid of it because it was using oil and there was a nice rot hole in the frame. To this day the whole family regrets letting it go. I have little doubt that one would have made 200k.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,407
8,595
126
Originally posted by: Arkaign

Top Tier : Honda/Acura, Toyota/Lexus
Better than Average : Nissan/Infiniti, GM, Volvo
Average : Ford, Hyundai, Mazda, VW, Mercedes, Suzuki, Saab
Worse than Average : Audi, BMW
Terrible : Mitsubishi, Dodge

i'd argue that one. ghosn took the quality out as a cost-cutting measure.

and i'd also put VW in 'Terrible.' it can't be better than audi.
 

mrblotto

Golden Member
Jul 7, 2007
1,639
117
106
Hoping to get to 250K on my '97 Celica. On 197K now and no major engine repairs needed yet, just regular stuff like timing belt, plugs, wires, dist cap,etc.......
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: steppinthrax
Somehow I knew before i clicked on that link all of those cars would be either (toyota, Honda, Nissan). And not to my surprise that is the case.

A big hoot for Toyota :thumbsup:

Toyota... the masters of building an engine 10x stronger than it needs to be for the application :)

The crank in my 130 HP Camry could hold up a skyscraper lol
Yep, but that is how you have to do it. It's all relative.

Some of those Toyota engines can spin 12,000RPM on stock internals with proper induction and exhaust modifications. I forget which engines offhand, but that is fairly insane.

 

996GT2

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2005
5,212
0
76
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: exdeath
Originally posted by: steppinthrax
Somehow I knew before i clicked on that link all of those cars would be either (toyota, Honda, Nissan). And not to my surprise that is the case.

A big hoot for Toyota :thumbsup:

Toyota... the masters of building an engine 10x stronger than it needs to be for the application :)

The crank in my 130 HP Camry could hold up a skyscraper lol
Yep, but that is how you have to do it. It's all relative.

Some of those Toyota engines can spin 12,000RPM on stock internals with proper induction and exhaust modifications. I forget which engines offhand, but that is fairly insane.

Some of the earlier Honda B16 and B18 engines could rev to over 10,000 RPM as well with essentially a balancing and reassembly of the stock parts (and some modifications) by companies such as Spoon Sports. IIRC Some spoon B16 1.6 Liter VTEC engines could rev to 15,000 RPM and made 250 naturally aspirated HP.

 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Arkaign

Top Tier : Honda/Acura, Toyota/Lexus
Better than Average : Nissan/Infiniti, GM, Volvo
Average : Ford, Hyundai, Mazda, VW, Mercedes, Suzuki, Saab
Worse than Average : Audi, BMW
Terrible : Mitsubishi, Dodge

i'd argue that one. ghosn took the quality out as a cost-cutting measure.

and i'd also put VW in 'Terrible.' it can't be better than audi.

Could be on the Nissan deal, I guess we'll have to watch how the longevity reports come back on his gen cars.

I think (never owned one, just going by availability of older VWs) that because Audis are usually more technically complex, with more systems to potentially break down. I'm not a fan of VW at all, but that's just my distant opinion on Audi vs VW. I'd rather own an Audi of course, but that's style/power vs. perceived reliability.

I have much more direct experience via personal and family/friends with Honda/Toyota/Ford/Chevy/Dodge/Nissan/Mazda/Volvo/BMW that the rest.

And lastly, my list is of course just my own personal reference list ATM on the major brands, represents purely my opinion based on observation, and I hope not to either offend anyone with it, or give the impression that it is set in stone in any way.

Thanks for your feedback :) I'd like to see your list as well!
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Arkaign

Top Tier : Honda/Acura, Toyota/Lexus
Better than Average : Nissan/Infiniti, GM, Volvo
Average : Ford, Hyundai, Mazda, VW, Mercedes, Suzuki, Saab
Worse than Average : Audi, BMW
Terrible : Mitsubishi, Dodge

i'd argue that one. ghosn took the quality out as a cost-cutting measure.

and i'd also put VW in 'Terrible.' it can't be better than audi.

I don't think Nissan has ever rated as highly as they do now on quality comparisons, so I'm not sure what you mean about Ghosn taking quality out. If anything, he's put it in.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: Strk
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Arkaign

Top Tier : Honda/Acura, Toyota/Lexus
Better than Average : Nissan/Infiniti, GM, Volvo
Average : Ford, Hyundai, Mazda, VW, Mercedes, Suzuki, Saab
Worse than Average : Audi, BMW
Terrible : Mitsubishi, Dodge

i'd argue that one. ghosn took the quality out as a cost-cutting measure.

and i'd also put VW in 'Terrible.' it can't be better than audi.

I don't think Nissan has ever rated as highly as they do now on quality comparisons, so I'm not sure what you mean about Ghosn taking quality out. If anything, he's put it in.

I don't know, I've always been impressed with Nissan just based on experiences with friends/family. This is one the common ones though, the Sentra/Maxima/Altimas.
 

Summitdrinker

Golden Member
May 10, 2004
1,193
0
0
mercury grand marquis and ford crown vic didn't make the list.............BS plenty of them go well over 200K if the owners takes care of them
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: Summitdrinker
mercury grand marquis and ford crown vic didn't make the list.............BS plenty of them go well over 200K if the owners takes care of them

:thumbsup: