I'd ask the question if the scsi 10,000 rpm is fast enough to justify it over a 7200 rpm ide. Thats just me though.
You know, I still don?t understand how someone could say such a thing. A friend of mine recently bought one of the 120gig WD?s with the 8megs of cache, and honestly, it was nowhere near the access time of the Atlas 10k I played with. The only area I can see these drive?s competing with SCSI in is average transfer rate, which so far, has been 40+or minus on every drive I?ve owned/used.
bdog231: You really only have two drives to consider, assuming you want the best SCSI has to offer. Either the 10K III or the elite Cheetah X15-36LP. A considerable price difference between them, and you'd be best to evaluate your performance requirements before dropping the extra dough for the X15-36LP. Having used 10K III's of various capacities in various configurations, I've found them unbeatable from a price/performance standpoint. That said, nothing, and I mean nothing, matches the responsiveness and raw data thoroughput of the X15-36LP's. They're blazing fast and worth every last red cent.
Thanks for the input Pabster. In light of all your info, I took a good look at what I would need/want and I think your right. The Atlas 10k III is an awesome deal at only 166, compared to the cheetah, which is over 250! Seeing as how I?m a highschool student(I?m out in 2 months!) with a small income, I think the 10kIII would be best for me. I?ll save the 15,000+ rpm drives for when I hit the big times and have a ridiculously large income 😀