1/4 Mile time of a 94 3000GT?

[DarkManX]

Cant seem to find any accurate data online about it, does anyone know the specs? kinda tryin to settle a bet, its a stock 3000GT (SL trim I believe) Deff not a VR-4.

 

[fs5]

http://www.dragtimes.com/browse3.php?carmake=Mitsubishi&carmodel=3000GT

 

[Kenazo]

you could also look for dodge stealth times.

 

[Actaeon]

Probally pretty slow.... in the high 15s i'm willing to wager.

 

[DarkManX]

looks like my friends pretty 3000GT is gonna get raped by a turbo bettle :\

 

[NutBucket]

Yep, most definitely.

 

[Mutilator]

Manual or Auto? Manuals are about .5 - 1 second quicker than the autos.
My 95 base auto ran 15.8@89.9 which was considered to be the fastest stock auto 3000GT.
SLs are slightly heavier than the base models... I'd say roughly low-mid 15s for a manual and low-mid 16s with the auto.

VR4s are obviously a dif story and run upper 13s - lower 14s stock.

I traded my 3000GT on my 2000 Lightning. Needless to say it's MUCH faster.

You can get good reliable info from 3Si.org

 

[maziwanka]

Originally posted by: Mutilator
Manual or Auto? Manuals are about .5 - 1 second quicker than the autos.
My 95 base auto ran 15.8@89.9 which was considered to be the fastest stock auto 3000GT.
SLs are slightly heavier than the base models... I'd say roughly low-mid 15s for a manual and low-mid 16s with the auto.

VR4s are obviously a dif story and run upper 13s - lower 14s stock.

I traded my 3000GT on my 2000 Lightning. Needless to say it's MUCH faster.

You can get good reliable info from 3Si.org

sweet upgrade

 

[halik]

stock vr-4 can do mid 13s the whole day,
SLs are rediculous slow due to FWD and weigt...

Oh yeah i saw a red '99 VR4 today. I've never seen a 99 3kGT, not to mention a VR4.
That anglular wing looks amazing

 

[DougK62]

Are we talking the 160hp version or the 222hp one? Either way they're butt slow. I once saw a manual 222hp car break out of the 16's - that's the fastest I'd seen out of a stock non-VR4 3000GT. They're really quite pathetic for as good as they look.

A Turbo Beetle would win easily.

 

[Mutilator]

Originally posted by: DougK62
Are we talking the 160hp version or the 222hp one? Either way they're butt slow. I once saw a manual 222hp car break out of the 16's - that's the fastest I'd seen out of a stock non-VR4 3000GT. They're really quite pathetic for as good as they look.

A Turbo Beetle would win easily.

1991-1996 Base model - 222HP
1997-1999 Base model - 167HP
1991-1999 SL model - 222HP
1991-1993 VR4 - 300HP
1994-1999 VR4 - 320HP
2000 Lightning - 360HP

 

[DougK62]

Originally posted by: Mutilator

Originally posted by: DougK62
Are we talking the 160hp version or the 222hp one? Either way they're butt slow. I once saw a manual 222hp car break out of the 16's - that's the fastest I'd seen out of a stock non-VR4 3000GT. They're really quite pathetic for as good as they look.

A Turbo Beetle would win easily.

1991-1996 Base model - 222HP
1997-1999 Base model - 167HP
1991-1999 SL model - 222HP
1991-1993 VR4 - 300HP
1994-1999 VR4 - 320HP
2000 Lightning - 360HP

So what's your point?

 

[Mutilator]

Originally posted by: DougK62

Originally posted by: Mutilator

Originally posted by: DougK62
Are we talking the 160hp version or the 222hp one? Either way they're butt slow. I once saw a manual 222hp car break out of the 16's - that's the fastest I'd seen out of a stock non-VR4 3000GT. They're really quite pathetic for as good as they look.

A Turbo Beetle would win easily.

1991-1996 Base model - 222HP
1997-1999 Base model - 167HP
1991-1999 SL model - 222HP
1991-1993 VR4 - 300HP
1994-1999 VR4 - 320HP
2000 Lightning - 360HP

So what's your point?

Well he said his friend had a 1994 3000GT SL. I gave you the chart so you can figure out how much HP that car has.

 

[DarkManX]

its a manual 220 HP or whatever.