1.3 MP camera, $11 (requires a little work)

Dragon365

Golden Member
Jul 23, 2002
1,238
0
0
I should get one of those, but I don't know if they sell them in Connecticut. Here's a link to a cable that will fit it, after you shave a little off the camera side connector.

Cable
 

pxc

Platinum Member
May 2, 2002
2,001
0
0
Originally posted by: Dragon365
I should get one of those, but I don't know if they sell them in Connecticut. Here's a link to a cable that will fit it, after you shave a little off the camera side connector.

Cable

Sweet, 99 cents only stores sells those for a buck. I still have several compgeeks $1.25 USB cables.
 

kehi

Diamond Member
Sep 18, 2000
3,357
0
0
Anywhere on the East Coast to get these? Is it only in a B&M only or can I order one online? Thanks for any info
 

CTho9305

Elite Member
Jul 26, 2000
9,214
1
81
Originally posted by: kehi
Is This the guide I should use to try it?

I got the impression you just install the software and hook up a cable, but that is the most helpful page that I saw.
 

jimmyhaha

Platinum Member
Jan 7, 2001
2,851
0
0
if I am reading the artilce correctly, it takes 10+ hours to download the raw data (picture) from the camera to pc.

What a PITA
 

GeneralS

Senior member
Aug 23, 2002
508
0
76
I gather the 10+ hour transfer was their initial success. They seem to have solved that, but it doesn't say how long the transfer is now.
 

Kwad Guy

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 1999
3,478
0
0
Let's see: Cheapo quality. Really low quality lens. Mediocre or worse pictures. Lots of my time to figure out the hack and a long time to download the pictures.

Not too hot IMHO. I can imagine a few ideas for how you might use these (someone mentioned a party), but given how crappy the whole thing is, why bother otherwise.

Kwad
 

isaacmacdonald

Platinum Member
Jun 7, 2002
2,820
0
0
Originally posted by: Kwad Guy
Let's see: Cheapo quality. Really low quality lens. Mediocre or worse pictures. Lots of my time to figure out the hack and a long time to download the pictures.

Not too hot IMHO. I can imagine a few ideas for how you might use these (someone mentioned a party), but given how crappy the whole thing is, why bother otherwise.

Kwad


err. total cost of 13.00 is still hot.
These Pics are not so bad.
 

DanFungus

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2001
5,857
0
0
Originally posted by: isaacmacdonald
Originally posted by: Kwad Guy
Let's see: Cheapo quality. Really low quality lens. Mediocre or worse pictures. Lots of my time to figure out the hack and a long time to download the pictures.

Not too hot IMHO. I can imagine a few ideas for how you might use these (someone mentioned a party), but given how crappy the whole thing is, why bother otherwise.

Kwad


err. total cost of 13.00 is still hot.
These Pics are not so bad.

definitely.
for someone that doesn't want to spend $100+ on a digital camera, this seems like a nice/cheap way to have one that you could think more of as a portable webcam with the quality of a pretty good one..
 

pxc

Platinum Member
May 2, 2002
2,001
0
0
Originally posted by: isaacmacdonald
err. total cost of 13.00 is still hot.
These Pics are not so bad.

The camera does have a very cheap lens, but $13 + tax for a usable and disposable camera (plus sync cable and usb cable) that I can leave in my car is hot.
 

nebula

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2001
1,315
3
0
Originally posted by: Kwad Guy
Let's see: Cheapo quality. Really low quality lens. Mediocre or worse pictures. Lots of my time to figure out the hack and a long time to download the pictures.

Not too hot IMHO. I can imagine a few ideas for how you might use these (someone mentioned a party), but given how crappy the whole thing is, why bother otherwise.

Kwad

I think you misread. Make a cable, install software, that's it. Hacking has been done for you. I guess getting the cable to attach to the camera is the most major part. Seems like the cheapest decent webcam I can find. Usually any webcam you see for around this price is crap. But since this is technically a camera...

I'm going to see if I can find one!

EDIT: The long d/l time was the initial attempt.
 

Karsten

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,192
0
0
err. total cost of 13.00 is still hot.
These Pics are not so bad.

I agree... that is SMOKING HOT!!! A digital Camera that with 13$ and a few tweaks makes pretty good pictures for the web. I'll get a couple, Mod them and send them to Missionary Friends. I don't even need to worry about the thing getting stolen in the mail!
 

nebula

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2001
1,315
3
0
Just reread that info page. One of the to-dos is to see if a webcam mode can be enabled. So looks like webcam not possible yet, assuming that's recent.

EDIT: Went to their MSN group, small yet, but someone said there is two drivers for it, one for snapshots and one for video.
 

GroundZero

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 2002
3,669
1
0
Originally posted by: isaacmacdonald
Originally posted by: Kwad Guy
Let's see: Cheapo quality. Really low quality lens. Mediocre or worse pictures. Lots of my time to figure out the hack and a long time to download the pictures.

Not too hot IMHO. I can imagine a few ideas for how you might use these (someone mentioned a party), but given how crappy the whole thing is, why bother otherwise.

Kwad


err. total cost of 13.00 is still hot.
These Pics are not so bad.


go buy a barbie digicam for about 15 bucks and you got a better deal than this pos...
but to each his own, so have fun wasting an enormouse amount of time trying to monkey with this thing
 

pxc

Platinum Member
May 2, 2002
2,001
0
0
Originally posted by: GroundZero

go buy a barbie digicam for about 15 bucks and you got a better deal than this pos...
but to each his own, so have fun wasting an enormouse amount of time trying to monkey with this thing

Congratulations, that's the most ignorant thing I've heard all day.

A barbie camera with a 320x240 CMOS sensor is a better deal than a 1.3MP CCD camera and 10 minutes of modifications? Please don't feel you have the need to post in every thread. Thanks.
 

bigpow

Platinum Member
Dec 10, 2000
2,372
2
81
IMO, too much work for such a low quality.
For a science project, it would be perfect.

(this is still a free country last time I check - no trolls please)