Okay out of the 15 replies, I count 5 negatives, and no positives. I'm guessing Americans aren't crazy for Playstation 4. That'll change once it is actually unveiled on February 20 - 2 weeks from today.
HA. You can tell this is the year 2013 - when 1080p gaming is no longer cool, but 2560x1440 is. I.e. everyone's into technology - highly unusual. That was the joke. Soon - "1080p is passé, 2160p is the new in."
I helped design it. I studied the alien technology, being a scientist working in top secret missions. Seriously though - very advanced. 20 years ahead of all other hardware.
What does this mean for you? Well - it has Windows-like OS support. So the person will be able to surf the web...
Yes but you're not exactly taking the best CPU from every 2 years and then comparing it to the previous - most of those are centered after 2005. Only the Pentium 2 is in 1998. But yes it is has doubled that fast - for that app.
On a different note - these processors are not advancing as fast as I thought they were. It's a completely linear increase. Every year - it increases by the same amount X. Thus since 2004 - it has increased by approximately the strength of the Pentium 4 HT, every year, in performance. Thus 9...
I would postulate that the Pentium 4 660 would give 1/4 the performance of the Intel i7 3770K. But it in fact gives 1/10th the performance. Why - the i7 3770K has 8 MB of L3 cache - the Pentium 4 660 doesn't. Thus - the L3 cache makes a difference. If not for that - it would be 1/4th. The...
The memory bandwidth has only tripled on Intel's CPUs since 2004, a space of 9 years. The Pentium 4 HT Extreme supported 8.512 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the latest Intel Core i7 Extreme Edition only supports 25.6 GB/s...
The Pentium 4 Extreme Edition's maximum memory bandwidth was 8.512 GB/s. It was released in 2004:
http://ark.intel.com/products/27492/Pentium-4-Processor-Extreme-Edition-supporting-HT-Technology-3_73-GHz-2M-Cache-1066-MHz-FSB
The second generation Core i7 Extreme Edition (the latest Intel...
This also allows for far greater optimization of the memory - which is key. As the memory problem is the main problem. A regular computer:
CPU
A few hundred registers
8 MB of L2 cache
512 Kbytes of L1 cache
An external memory bus
A bus to the GPU
GPU
512 - 4 GB of DDR5 RAM
A separate bus to...
It's far more power efficient. It makes the computer smaller. You don't even need a separate graphics chip on the motherboard, let alone another video card.
However the 12-15 times greater general purpose-processing will open the door of possibilities. Greater A.I. performance, more characters (playable and non-playable), and better physics. This generation had very small numbers for all of those.
Okay new information. Apparently the Bobcat is a 380 million transistor processor, with just 2 cores. Why - the on-chip GPU, 80 32-bit SIMD units. However - the Jaguar will not have that. It will have a separate SIMD unit. So it's hard to tell how many transistors the Bobcat is actually...
According to IBM they are both based on the Power4 architecture. Just an interesting side-note. Why's that? Basically the same hardware - similar pipeline, clock-speeds, and transistor size. It simply uses half the execution units - except for the VMX. They took the Power4 and modified it.
Upon close examination - mine only shows PCMark. Your shows that one, and others. But your PCMark one is an average of all 6 - mine show all 6 separately. I didn't look at all of the individual marks. So it turns out - the different benchmarks do agree - the Brazos is better in all 6...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.