Recent content by pedramrezai

For those wodering why their system gains lower scores than others,I've got an interesting example: My desktop is S754 sempron 2800(256 L2)@2.4(300x8)-1GB DDR533(SingleChannel,1T) with GF7600GS scoring 36s in 1M. sandra2007:Mem BW= 4054/4054,CpuArithm=8698/7362 My laptop is Celeron M...

Super Pi/mod1.4 1M=35.171 s Super Pi/mod1.5 1M=35.156 s Super Pi/SSE3 1M=34 s Sempron64 2800-1.6(200x8)@2.6(325x8@1.525) Epox 8NPAJ (s754-nf4 4x) 1GB Ballistix PC4000@DDR520@3.0V@1T Point of View GF7600GS

3DMark 2005 and nV Firewall Conflict After wasting so much time, money and energy I figured out something that migt be useful for many people. My system: Sempron64 2800,epox 8npaj(s754,NF4),1GB Crucial PC4000,GF7600GS I experienced random errors on 3dmark 2005 just as the first game ends...

3DMark 2005 and nV Firewall Conflict After wasting so much time, money and energy I figured out something that migt be useful for many people. My system: Sempron64 2800,epox 8npaj(s754,NF4),1GB Crucial PC4000,GF7600GS I experienced random errors on 3dmark 2005 just as the first game ends...

MrS, As far as I can remember SSE2 was a major update for intel; at least they claimed it is a mojor instruction set and AMD was forced to include it in its products. Maybe SSE4 has the same fate. I know that they do not need to increase HTT in order to use faster memories but it only makes...

MrS, Thanks for clarifications. I do not remember where I saw the difference between dual 16x and dual 8x but as far as I can remember the difference was significant. As far as I know the new Core architecture brings upon a new instruction set of SSE4. Finally, I am quite optimistic about AMD...

I thought ScienceMark 2 is not a synthetic benchmark. Here are some other benchmarks: 3Dmark2005 cpu score=4801 super pi 1M=33s Winrar 3.50 606 kb/s PC mark 2002 mem score= 9224

Dear user, I know what I am talking about and I think your stream of thoughts needs a little bit of defragmentation so that you will be able to think more organized and to express your ideas more politely. This is my idea and I am free to express it and I think they have been based on objective...

Dear Intelligent user, Increasing HTT bus to 333MHz bus MATTERs when paired with appropriate memory. My budget sempron 2800 (1.6Ghz) is working @ 2.4(8x300) paired with a single 512MB module @ DDR600 (3,3,3,8,1T) which yields a mem bandwith of 4.6GB/s that is comparable with dual channel setups...

A64 will be bandwith hungry when FSB is increases in parallel with mem frequency. My Sempron 2800@ 8x300=2400 paired with DDR600 memory yields a bandwith of 4.6GB/s with single channel memory which is near the bandwith of most dual channel systems. Using a 333 or 400 FSB and pairing them with...

My wisdom is not that great as yours. But I think making comparisions between future products and a 2-3 years old product can be misleading. If you could compare a A64 with 8x333=2666 with DDR667 memory you could have called this a more legitimate comparision. I think that theorical system...

The way most of the people are thinking is just the way Intel has planned. I am a AMD fan but I can realize competition is good for customers. I was shocked by Core performance but using a handicapped AMD system really annoyed me. First, reviewers have already proven RD580 or solutions with dual...

The way most of the people are thinking is just the way Intel has planned. I am a AMD fan but I can realize competition is good for customers. I was shocked by Core performance but using a handicapped AMD system really annoyed me. First, reviewers have already proven RD580 or solutions with dual...

The way most of the people are thinking is just the way Intel has planned. I am a AMD fan but I can realize competition is good for customers. I was shocked by Core performance but using a handicapped AMD system really annoyed me. First, reviewers have already proven RD580 or solutions with dual...

The way most of the people are thinking is just the way Intel has planned. I am a AMD fan but I can realize competition is good for customers. I was shocked by Core performance but using a handicapped AMD system really annoyed me. First, reviewers have already proven RD580 or solutions with dual...