dangerman1337's latest activity
-
Ddangerman1337 reacted to lucasworais's post in the thread Discussion RDNA 5 / UDNA (CDNA Next) speculation with
Like.
If they are truly targeting the RTX6090 with a 154CU 384b 380w part, RDNA5 must be a really good architecture -
Ddangerman1337 replied to the thread Discussion RDNA 5 / UDNA (CDNA Next) speculation.I suspect Nvidia will be cutting L2 Cache for their dies in a similar way AMD is; with 36 Gbps GDDR7 there is little need for a lot of...
-
Ddangerman1337 replied to the thread Discussion RDNA 5 / UDNA (CDNA Next) speculation.I suspect AT0 is 192 CUs, 512-bit bus memory with 64MB L2 Cache and I think AT2 is 72 CUs, 192-bit bus memory with 24MB L2 Cache if...
-
Ddangerman1337 replied to the thread Discussion RDNA 5 / UDNA (CDNA Next) speculation.Besides Nvidia is aiming for robotics with AI/ML being the stepping stone towards that. Jensen is playing the long game.
-
Ddangerman1337 replied to the thread Discussion RDNA 5 / UDNA (CDNA Next) speculation.From the use of 384-bit bus in Magnus & 96 CU UDNA die, I suspect that AMD is maybe gutting Infinity Cache altogether from their cards...
-
Ddangerman1337 reacted to Vikv1918's post in the thread Discussion RDNA 5 / UDNA (CDNA Next) speculation with Like.
Does that 2x RT perf use current RDNA4 perf as a baseline? I'm asking because FSR4 Redstone and Direct RT 1.2 will bring some perf boost...
-
Ddangerman1337 replied to the thread Discussion Leading Edge Foundry Node advances (TSMC, Samsung Foundry, Intel) - [2020 - 2025].Yeah meant to mention SRAM instead of just "density". That's why I can see an Zen CCD on A5 doing 32 Cores w/ 128MB Cache, if Zen 7 is...
-
Ddangerman1337 reacted to soresu's post in the thread Discussion RDNA 5 / UDNA (CDNA Next) speculation with Like.
Actually that's pretty par for the course. The first PC APU with RDNA2 (Rembrandt IIRC) was announced in Jan 2022, over a year after...
-
Ddangerman1337 reacted to ToTTenTranz's post in the thread Discussion RDNA 5 / UDNA (CDNA Next) speculation with Like.
I don't get this. On one side we have leakers claiming AMD's mobile APUs will start watering down their iGPUs because the market isn't...
-
Ddangerman1337 reacted to 511's post in the thread Discussion Leading Edge Foundry Node advances (TSMC, Samsung Foundry, Intel) - [2020 - 2025] with Like.
It can be both but we will get to know in JULY it's hilarious how kranzich F*** up and the company is not stabilized after 7 years of...
-
Ddangerman1337 reacted to Hitman928's post in the thread Discussion Leading Edge Foundry Node advances (TSMC, Samsung Foundry, Intel) - [2020 - 2025] with Like.
I think it’s far more likely that the blank check Pat gave to the fabs to build IFS 2.0 has been rescinded after failing to attract any...
-
Ddangerman1337 reacted to Doug S's post in the thread Discussion Leading Edge Foundry Node advances (TSMC, Samsung Foundry, Intel) - [2020 - 2025] with Like.
They're not saying you don't need high NA eventually, just that it isn't the enabling technology for GAA and especially CFET.
-
Ddangerman1337 reacted to Hitman928's post in the thread Discussion Leading Edge Foundry Node advances (TSMC, Samsung Foundry, Intel) - [2020 - 2025] with Like.
Pat had them expand personnel and capex in anticipation of major fab customer wins which never materialized, so now LBT has to shrink...
-
Ddangerman1337 replied to the thread Discussion Leading Edge Foundry Node advances (TSMC, Samsung Foundry, Intel) - [2020 - 2025].CFET doubling density (Logic, SRAM and maybe I/O as well? GPU Memory bit busses being halved would allow some funky stuff like SoCs on...
-
Ddangerman1337 replied to the thread Discussion Intel Nova Lake in H2-2026: Discussion Threads.Wonder what the extra cache SKU is and when it comes out? stacked? Or all in one die (hopefully P Core only, imagine either 16P...
Facebook
Twitter