Recent content by babbage

Oooops The setihide to setiqueue cache problem was a routing issue. So thats fixed :D Shuxclams Just to keep everybody upto date heres where I am at the moment Setup one client with seti and setihide properly configured to connect to the Q Checked that all the setihide settings were correct...

Two big problems 1 At about 1mb of Wu per day per client I am looking at about 1Gb of data download per day!!!!!!!!!!! 2 setiqueue and setihide do not play nice together, different wu caching so I can't get the seti clients to use setiqueue for the cache and connection to the internet setihide...

Status Have got the seti installer sorted and setiqueue so that end looks fine :) Multiple installs via a text list is also ok :) Serious problems using setihide in this scenario :( :( :( Still working on this DPAD is out as stated earlier due to various issues however three clients...

Nothing to do with me, never used that user ID Regards Babbage

Oooops sorry for ldap read DPAD too much w2k active directory on the brain :) emmmm can anyone explain how to make setiqueue point to somewhere else other than berkley? DPAD looks like a no go at the moment however I am going to use a p4 2.4 , athlon xp 2100 and pIII 600 on a seperate...

Thanks folks its late Friday afternoon here so what I'm going to do is download the relevant tools and utilities for seti, f@h, sob and ldap. PLay with them over the weekend, probably asking lots of dumb questions at the same time with a view to having a firm idea in my mind which if any is...

Thanks folks its late Friday afternoon here so what I'm going to do is download the relevant tools and utilities for seti, f@h, sob and ldap. PLay with them over the weekend, probably asking lots of dumb questions at the same time with a view to having a firm idea in my mind which if any is...

Splitting the herd is not really practical from a time management point of view. I'm afraid it's an all or nothing issue, as puting multiple proxies etc on the firewall is a no no. Currently seti is lookin interesting but I can see no way of deploying clients using setehide features (such as...

Splitting the herd is not really practical from a time management point of view. I'm afraid it's an all or nothing issue, as puting multiple proxies etc on the firewall is a no no. Currently seti is lookin interesting but I can see no way of deploying clients using setehide features (such as...

Appreciate the honesty, thanks I will be deploying a 100 pc test of whichever project seems best fit, to check for hidden issues. Leave it run for a week 24/7 and re-evaluate. So recommending an unstable/unsuitable project is just wasting my time, your (plural) time and everybodies time. I...

thougt dpad required ftp access and individual connection to the internet per pc i.e. no proxy???? regards Babbage

Many and varied :D roughly as follows 200 off P4 2.40 700 off PIII 1.4 200 off PIII 1.0 most have 128mb memory 43 have 512 Regards Babbage

Yup the port 80 is an issue, currently using proxy80.teamanandtech.com to solve that for dnet. If deployment tools existed for seti that allowed a rapid automated deployment usind prebuilt hostname lists then I wouldn't have a problem with the finish time Regards Babbage

I have got between 1000 and 1200 pc's available for distributed computing Currently I am deploying DNETC.exe for OGR crunching. However before I go to far into this (currently at about 200 deployed) I am looking around at other projects because to be honest the OGR thing is getting a bit...