News Intel GPUs - Battlemage rumoured cancelled (again)

Page 181 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

NTMBK

Lifer
Nov 14, 2011
10,248
5,045
136
Intel didn't approach your studio to help optimize the game you guys are working on, for Intel cards? Maybe then you could find out what's incoming and refute the rumors confidently :)
If we were working with any hardware vendor, that would be covered under an NDA :)
 

KompuKare

Golden Member
Jul 28, 2009
1,039
1,022
136
Do those have a clause preventing the refuting of rumors?
While I have zero experience if NDAs, I should think refuting a rumour almost confirms something and provides a fair bit of information... So I would expect that any comments other than "no comment" would be covered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NTMBK

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
14,687
5,317
136
I'm gonna go ahead and assume they just reallocated people to AI... but they should have cancelled the dGPUs a long time ago. It never made sense once they realized it wasn't going to work on 10 nm.
 

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,237
5,244
136
I'm gonna go ahead and assume they just reallocated people to AI... but they should have cancelled the dGPUs a long time ago. It never made sense once they realized it wasn't going to work on 10 nm.

Intel without credible GPU is dead in the long term. Instead of cancelling a long time ago, they should have made a serious GPU push a long time ago.
 
Jul 27, 2020
16,812
10,751
106
Intel without credible GPU is dead in the long term.
Forgetting the iGPU incarnations of Battlemage/Celestial? Their GPU effort is not dead. It's in hibernation. Also, the upcoming Intel "APUs" like LNL and PTL with 32GB LPDDR5X RAM will make including an Nvidia GPU on a laptop almost moot if their iGPU performance is at least at the level of 4050 6GB.

Then there's Strix Halo. Nvidia is getting pushed out of laptops! :D
 

Mahboi

Senior member
Apr 4, 2024
522
836
91
Intel without credible GPU is dead in the long term. Instead of cancelling a long time ago, they should have made a serious GPU push a long time ago.
They did. They just failed. Late, not ready on launch, massive dies compared to Radeon or Geforce of same performance...
 

Ghostsonplanets

Senior member
Mar 1, 2024
387
659
96
Intel cancelling or post-poning their dGPU efforts would be pretty sad. But to be honest it isn't something out of nowhere. It's a hard market to breach and gain anything significant.

IMO Intel should keep IGP uArch development and go towards an aggressive cadence of IGP updates. Intel sells around 50 - 100M SoCs every generation and are the biggest GPU makers in the PC space. They have a market play here to turn their GPUs into the market baseline for software developers. They just need to be more aggresive and increase more performance (As they're currently supposed to be doing with Alchemist -> Battlemage -> Celestial iGPs in the span of a year)
The IGPs are perfectly fine for everything but gaming though.
Eh. You can game pretty well on a 8 Xe Arc iGP. Even a Iris Xe is serviceable if you game older or less demanding titles. It's a far cry from the HD Graphics days.
 
Last edited:

Aapje

Golden Member
Mar 21, 2022
1,434
1,954
106
Perhaps Intel is waiting with a release until they catch up with their foundry.

And perhaps they'll further debug Arc by releasing Battlemage as an iGPU only?

Hard to say with so little information as to what they are actually planning & thinking.
 

Ghostsonplanets

Senior member
Mar 1, 2024
387
659
96
Perhaps Intel is waiting with a release until they catch up with their foundry.

And perhaps they'll further debug Arc by releasing Battlemage as an iGPU only?

Hard to say with so little information as to what they are actually planning & thinking.
Bionic had said that BMG dGPU would come this year previously. But it's possible he had old info.

BMG IP will ship this year with Lunar Lake. Celestial IP will also be ready and shipping next year with Panther Lake. So IP execution and readiness isn't the problem.

Perhaps it's a case of Intel not finding partners who want to release BMG cards for them. Which, given ACM issues, would be understandable.
 

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
7,936
6,233
136
Jensen isn't helping matters either, with his dire threats to not supply GPUs to OEMs who strike a deal with Intel for ARC dGPUs.

If he's actually doing that he's asking to get sued. No one actually likes NVidia enough to cover for them if government investigators come knocking either.

I don't see why he would care either way. Intel is in a distant third place right now and Intel gaining market share probably takes more from AMD than it does Intel.
 

mikk

Diamond Member
May 15, 2012
4,152
2,164
136
Intel started Linux driver work last month on Battlemage dGPU, why should they do this if it wouldn't come. We might hear something at Computex about Battlemage.
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
21,709
10,983
136
If he's actually doing that he's asking to get sued. No one actually likes NVidia enough to cover for them if government investigators come knocking either.

I don't see why he would care either way. Intel is in a distant third place right now and Intel gaining market share probably takes more from AMD than it does Intel.

Were I Intel and JHH issued such a threat, I would release exactly 1 Battlemage dGPU through an OEM (at least) just to provoke the opportunity for legal action. Easy money.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: igor_kavinski

Hans Gruber

Platinum Member
Dec 23, 2006
2,153
1,099
136
I think leaks are wrong. Intel has made huge strides with ARC on a broken architecture. It didn't work right but they made it work. They said they were moving 2/3rds of their engineering team to Battlemage at the end of 2023. It would make little sense to pause or delay their Discrete GPU's. As others have pointed out the GPU side of Intel is greatly improving their integrated GPU's for laptops.

It would be nice to see EVGA making GPU's again for either Intel or AMD. EVGA got so fed up with Nvidia that they dropped out as a GPU vendor.
 

Aapje

Golden Member
Mar 21, 2022
1,434
1,954
106
The question is how competitive Battlemage is going to be. No point in producing a massive number of GPUs only to have to sell them at less than cost. But releasing at least one card is probably needed to verify in reality how well the improved architecture functions in reality.
 
Jul 27, 2020
16,812
10,751
106
The question is how competitive Battlemage is going to be. No point in producing a massive number of GPUs only to have to sell them at less than cost. But releasing at least one card is probably needed to verify in reality how well the improved architecture functions in reality.
They should at least release a 4060/4060 Ti killer.
 

Aapje

Golden Member
Mar 21, 2022
1,434
1,954
106
'Killing' it against Nvidia is a very tough assignment when even the 6600 couldn't beat the 3050. And Battlemage should be up against the 5060 for most of its life anyway.

I'd just like to see something with a modest production quantity that is good enough so a bunch of REDACTED, adventurers and such get it. Bonus points if Intel adds/unlocks some special features so it is actually the best card for a certain niche, like running AI models that don't depend on CUDA.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jul 27, 2020
16,812
10,751
106
Violent, untimely demise by Navi48.
How certain are you about it? Gone for good? Or will it rear its lovely head in 2025?

Why are you calling it violent? I hate it when I have to try to decipher your riddles. What exactly happened? RT couldn't be the last straw that broke Intel's GPU camel's back. And what about Intel's "zero hit" realtime RT paper?