In a country dominated by 'fast food', why not 'fast housing' - "McHouses" for the people.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
21,364
19,824
136
This whole thread seems to be about building more houses with the assumption that the homeless people will be able to afford housing...drunks/drug addicts who can't pass a drug test for a job? Not so much.
Well in the original post he talks about tackling the general housing problem, which means getting more inventory out there in general to lower home prices for everyone - and also mentions these could be starting homes for younger people, And other groups not just homeless.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
67,468
12,175
126
www.anyf.ca
I guess that's nice for people who want to live on a university campus their whole life lol.

Peak performance is being as far away from others as possible and having lot of land. Single family home with a private yard is the closest thing most people will get. Anything less is a big compromise.
 
Dec 10, 2005
24,120
6,930
136
I guess that's nice for people who want to live on a university campus their whole life lol.

Peak performance is being as far away from others as possible and having lot of land. Single family home with a private yard is the closest thing most people will get. Anything less is a big compromise.
Different people want different things, news at 11.

And given that prices are higher in places with lots of amenities, it seems that people actually prefer the city style living over country living. And as with all things in life, there are tradeoffs. Prices clearly support that people are willing to sacrifice some land and space to live in the hearts of cities.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
46,155
33,311
136
I guess that's nice for people who want to live on a university campus their whole life lol.

Peak performance is being as far away from others as possible and having lot of land. Single family home with a private yard is the closest thing most people will get. Anything less is a big compromise.

Not everybody wants to live in the middle of nowhere far from basically every service they could need. I'd venture to say not even most people.
 
Dec 10, 2005
24,120
6,930
136
We managed it long before that. People may not like it but this is what peak performance looks like:

View attachment 97898
Can't do that now: "single stair are unsafe", "where will people park?" "No one [translation: I don't] wants to live like that" "Neighborhood character" "break up the hulking masses" "that's ugly" "community input"

Those Chicago floorplans were always fantastic. Lots of space, front to back ventilation because of the single stair configuration...
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
67,468
12,175
126
www.anyf.ca
The price is one of the biggest deterrents if anything. People are just dumb and follow what's trendy and being able to say you live in Toronto or NYC seems to be trendy for some reason. Why spend half a million dollars or more on a tiny cubby hole or live in a place that's not even yours for more money per month than a mortgage when you can get a full size house for half that in a smaller city? Sure the big cities might have some stores like big box computer stores that small cities don't have, but that's a pretty minor thing considering the sacrifice it takes to live near that.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
46,155
33,311
136
Can't do that now: "single stair are unsafe", "where will people park?" "No one [translation: I don't] wants to live like that" "Neighborhood character" "break up the hulking masses" "that's ugly" "community input"

Those Chicago floorplans were always fantastic. Lots of space, front to back ventilation because of the single stair configuration...

Courtyard buildings (and arguably 4+1s) are the true workhorse of housing affordability in Chicago. We should make them legal to build again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brainonska511

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
46,155
33,311
136
The price is one of the biggest deterrents if anything. People are just dumb and follow what's trendy and being able to say you live in Toronto or NYC seems to be trendy for some reason. Why spend half a million dollars or more on a tiny cubby hole or live in a place that's not even yours for more money per month than a mortgage when you can get a full size house for half that in a smaller city? Sure the big cities might have some stores like big box computer stores that small cities don't have, but that's a pretty minor thing considering the sacrifice it takes to live near that.

I can walk to half a dozen bars in 3 minutes from my house. Three dozen restaurants in less than 5. Pharmacy in 5. Grocery store in 7. Dentist/optician/doctor in 5-6. Movie theatre in 6. At least half a dozen concert/comedy venues within 8-15.

Any of these trips would have taken me 15-30 driving minutes each when I was living in Austin. That's why I don't live in a place like you describe.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
21,364
19,824
136
I guess that's nice for people who want to live on a university campus their whole life lol.

Peak performance is being as far away from others as possible and having lot of land. Single family home with a private yard is the closest thing most people will get. Anything less is a big compromise.

Except it's not for most people. Why aren't people banging down the doors to all move out by you? Nobody cares if you want to live out there, but the fact is, most people DO NOT find that peak performance. Those that do, go for it. Except stop taking urban area's moneys.

The amenities of cities are a huge benefit to lots of people. But you are up there with the most ignorant people so you will never figure it out, as this has been discussed ad infinitum and you have learned absolutely nothing from any factual posts in your life on here.

I can walk to half a dozen bars in 3 minutes from my house. Three dozen restaurants in less than 5. Pharmacy in 5. Grocery store in 7. Dentist/optician/doctor in 5-6. Movie theatre in 6. At least half a dozen concert/comedy venues within 8-15.

Any of these trips would have taken me 15-30 driving minutes each when I was living in Austin. That's why I don't live in a place like you describe.

This has been discussed with that ignoramus many times. As you see from his response he has zero clue how real life works. The amenities of a city could be a bix box computer store LOLOL

The guy is a mental midget and harmful to society.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brainonska511

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
46,155
33,311
136
This has been discussed with that ignoramus many times. As you see from his response he has zero clue how real life works. The amenities of a city could be a bix box computer store LOLOL

The guy is a mental midget and harmful to society.

I mean everybody has different interests but at some point a person has to recognize that their lifestyle may not actually be ideal to other most people.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
67,468
12,175
126
www.anyf.ca
I can walk to half a dozen bars in 3 minutes from my house. Three dozen restaurants in less than 5. Pharmacy in 5. Grocery store in 7. Dentist/optician/doctor in 5-6. Movie theatre in 6. At least half a dozen concert/comedy venues within 8-15.

Any of these trips would have taken me 15-30 driving minutes each when I was living in Austin. That's why I don't live in a place like you describe.

That's a pretty small positive considering most of those are things you might visit a few times a year, other than groceries. Having to be further from that is a minor trade off to being able to own a house and being in an area with less people.

No reason small cities can't also be designed to be walk friendly though. This would just require to rethink zoning. Why not allow people to run businesses from their home or even build a restaurant or grocery store in the middle of a residential area for example. Within reasonable means.

As for living in the country, well having to drive far for everything is a trade off, but a trade off that's worth it.
 

thestrangebrew1

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2011
3,459
400
126
We managed it long before that. People may not like it but this is what peak performance looks like:

View attachment 97898
This is pretty much exactly what I'm shooting for. I can't tell from the pic, but I'm trying to promote this type of development in my city, but allowing commercial/retail as well (typically on the bottom floor but I'm not forcing it). In mid May I'm taking a General Plan and Zoning Code amendment to introduce "Mixed-Use" districts. This would allow commercial/residential development on the same property with higher density requirements (20-32 units/acre) at different income levels with the goal to have goods and services within walking distance similar to what you describe in another post above.

I conducted a workshop with our planning commissioners, city council members and the public last week and got some generally positive comments back. Interesting time to live in such a small town (pop 5k) trying to get ahead of the game.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
35,360
28,677
136
I bet "polite people" means "people who like hearing me regurgitate talking points"
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
31,619
10,036
136
That's a pretty small positive considering most of those are things you might visit a few times a year, other than groceries. Having to be further from that is a minor trade off to being able to own a house and being in an area with less people.

No reason small cities can't also be designed to be walk friendly though. This would just require to rethink zoning. Why not allow people to run businesses from their home or even build a restaurant or grocery store in the middle of a residential area for example. Within reasonable means.

As for living in the country, well having to drive far for everything is a trade off, but a trade off that's worth it.
Then don't bitch about fuel costs and/or electrification.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brainonska511

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
46,155
33,311
136
That's a pretty small positive considering most of those are things you might visit a few times a year, other than groceries.

I'm literally gonna walk down to the pizza place at the end of my block for lunch in a while so I'm skeptical of your frequency estimate.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
67,468
12,175
126
www.anyf.ca
Then don't bitch about fuel costs and/or electrification.

Still a piss off to get gouged just for the hell of it. There is no excuse for that. Gas used to be under a buck a litre before 9/11. Was affordable then.

And if you think you are not affected by gas prices just because you don't drive you would be very wrong. The food you eat is not grown in a 15 minute city and somebody with a pickup truck built the apartment you live in.
 
Dec 10, 2005
24,120
6,930
136
Still a piss off to get gouged just for the hell of it. There is no excuse for that. Gas used to be under a buck a litre before 9/11. Was affordable then.

And if you think you are not affected by gas prices just because you don't drive you would be very wrong. The food you eat is not grown in a 15 minute city and somebody with a pickup truck built the apartment you live in.
Transportation costs are actually not that large of a cost associated food, so small increases in gas prices aren't that impactful overall.

Also, you'll be happy to learn that adjusted for inflation, gas prices are largely stable over the last few decades.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
46,155
33,311
136
Still a piss off to get gouged just for the hell of it. There is no excuse for that. Gas used to be under a buck a litre before 9/11. Was affordable then.

And if you think you are not affected by gas prices just because you don't drive you would be very wrong. The food you eat is not grown in a 15 minute city and somebody with a pickup truck built the apartment you live in.

You're quoting a fuel price from over 20 years ago.

Most construction guys I see drive the most busted 4 door daily drivers I've seen because they don't want to put miles on anything nice.