GOP New Hampshire Lawmaker Urges Married Couples To Practice Abstinence

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,152
27,965
136
I guess Republicans are trying to give the President a vacation this fall. Its getting hard to keep up with all these wacky conservatives.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/...-hampshire-lawmaker-abstinence_n_1284934.html

A New Hampshire lawmaker with a history of surprising statements suggested on Thursday that married couples who want to use contraception should practice abstinence instead of using birth control pills.

State Rep. Lynne Blankenbeker (R-Concord) made the claim -- noting that abstinence is available "over the counter" along with condoms -- during a legislative committee hearing on a resolution urging the Obama administration to drop the birth control requirement for religious organizations. Blankenbeker was trying to explain her position on why the administration's requirement to provide insurance coverage for birth control should be overturned.

"People with or without insurance have two affordable choices, one being abstinence and the other being condoms, both of which you can get over the counter," she said.

The comments came at the same hearing where state Rep. Jeanine Notter (R-Merrimack) claimed that birth control pills lead to prostate cancer. In an interview with Merrimack Patch, Notter said that she was referring to studies discussing potentially high levels of estrogen in the environment through birth control pills and a connection to prostate cancer.

Blankenbeker was engaged in a dialogue with Sylvia Kennedy, a New Hampshire doctor, who was testifying in support of Obama's plan. Kennedy urged the coverage of birth control and responded to Blankenbeker that condoms are not a foolproof means of contraception, and also suggested that abstinence does not work all the time, a notion Blankenbeker disagreed with.
"Abstinence works 100 percent of the time," she said.

Blankenbeker also asserted that condoms and abstinence offer married couples a wider range of family planning options than oral contraceptives.

"If you decide you want to get pregnant you can refrain from abstinence," she said.
Blankenbeker declined a request to comment.

The resolution was introduced last week in the Tea Party-controlled New Hampshire House by Majority Leader D.J. Betencourt (R-Salem) with the goal of urging the Obama administration to reverse course on the contraception coverage mandate. Betencourt's resolution came the same day that Obama changed the original mandate for religious groups to provide birth control coverage to employees, shifting policy to make insurance companies provide the coverage for employees of religious groups.

Blankenbeker's comments have gained attention before, including a statement she made last year claiming that Osama bin Laden was not dead and a suggestion that she use her military training to shoot at unions.
 

PeshakJang

Platinum Member
Mar 17, 2010
2,276
0
0
I'm still waiting to find out why insurance companies should be paying for recreational sex to begin with.
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
The OP "forgot" half of Lynne's statement in his thread title. Most likely HomerJS "forgot" it because he loses much of his emotional component if he had "remembered" to add it.
 

HumblePie

Lifer
Oct 30, 2000
14,667
440
126
someone explain to me how birth control pills for women lead to prostate cancer?
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,816
83
91
does anyone actually care about state representatives? I couldn't even tell you who mine is without looking it up.
 

PeshakJang

Platinum Member
Mar 17, 2010
2,276
0
0
Because it's cheaper than the insurance company paying for childbirth and all of the associated costs?

Isn't that up to the insurance company?

Do you understand the concept of insurance?

Has anybody ever had accidental recreational sex?

Do you think there has ever been an instance of somebody saying, "damn, if I only had insurance, I could go afford $10 for a box of condoms..." before plowing a girl?

There is no justification whatsoever for making an insurance company pay for recreational sex. None. Don't shift the responsibility for an individual's actions from the individual to a private corporation.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
I'm still waiting to find out why insurance companies should be paying for recreational sex to begin with.

Because they prefer it to paying for pregnancy, childbirth, & providing healthcare services to children on their parents' policies for the following 25 years...

You might notice that insurance providers haven't raised any objections to that provision in the new law, for good reason...
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
does anyone actually care about state representatives? I couldn't even tell you who mine is without looking it up.

Maybe because if he's wacky enough then Repubs will offer him up for national office....
 

the DRIZZLE

Platinum Member
Sep 6, 2007
2,956
1
81
You might notice that insurance providers haven't raised any objections to that provision in the new law, for good reason...

They didn't object because it will just be priced into premiums. Since everyone now has to buy health insurance and they have a legally mandated maximum percentage of overhead and profit they actually benefit from providing more services. If it really saved them money I would think they would have already made in free in the old days when their profits weren't regulated. However, one unfortunate side effect of Obamacare is that by capping overhead and profit it has taken away some of the incentive for insurance companies to reduce costs.
 

Double Trouble

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,272
103
106
Because they prefer it to paying for pregnancy, childbirth, & providing healthcare services to children on their parents' policies for the following 25 years...

That makes complete sense... but it should be up to the insurance companies to make that determination, there shouldn't be a law mandating that they have to cover it. I think birth control coverage should be mandated only as it relates to medical use (ie, not for contraception). If you want to prevent pregnancy, you can pay for it yourself, that's not a medical issue.
 

nickbits

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2008
4,122
1
81
Maybe they should stop providing care for anything that is the result of an accident from a recreational activity?

Broke your leg skiing? You pay.
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,550
4,632
136
"If you decide you want to get pregnant you can refrain from abstinence," she said.
Blankenbeker declined a request to comment.



That's one of the most tortured euphemism for sex I've ever heard.
 

jstern01

Senior member
Mar 25, 2010
532
0
71
Maybe they should stop providing care for anything that is the result of an accident from a recreational activity?

Broke your leg skiing? You pay.

Or Cancer, Heart Disease, car accidents. Heck why even have health insurance, we never had it back in my grand fathers day, and most of the hospitals were public and fund by local taxing districts. Sounds like a plan to me.
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
Or Cancer, Heart Disease, car accidents. Heck why even have health insurance, we never had it back in my grand fathers day, and most of the hospitals were public and fund by local taxing districts. Sounds like a plan to me.

I think each state should create its own public health system. This would solve a lot of problems.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,894
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com

xBiffx

Diamond Member
Aug 22, 2011
8,232
2
0
Typical of the radical righties, 100% in your bedroom.

Keep voting Republican, apparently Americans like it.

Typical of the left. Take a small state issue and apply it to all of America. You and Homer are great together. :rolleyes:
 

jackschmittusa

Diamond Member
Apr 16, 2003
5,972
1
0
And "recreational sex" is believed by ignorant men to be the only reason for using birth control pills.

Maybe the Republicans should push masturbation for married couples for those times when abstinence just won't do.
 

Ausm

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
25,215
14
81
does anyone actually care about state representatives? I couldn't even tell you who mine is without looking it up.

You have to in my State, Dem's sat on their hands in the election cycle and now see what kind of shit we have to deal with.