JTsyo
Lifer
- Nov 18, 2007
- 11,840
- 979
- 126
Finally living somewhere like this has been great for me. Just through casually playing in town I've now got a drummer and bass player for my punk project, and I'm already putting the wheels in motion for a space banjo project later on this year--just talked to a wild bass clarinet player last night to recruit him for that one, it's potentially growing into more of a generalized psychedelic experimental thing. If I pick the right venues, I could maybe even have an aerial dance routine going on during the set. In other cities I'd probably have to be putting out ads looking for people to do all this stuff instead of just bumping into these people.Not all, but a majority of great artists get together in cities, and that is how art is created. Ideas bouncing off of other creatives breeds results. One funny thing with artists in cities and housing is artists move in to the cheaper areas with larger spaces to have room to create in, because most artists are not well off, they make it cool to live there, housing prices go up, the artists are priced out. This has happened in countless neighborhoods in major cities over the decades.
The "tiny homes" are doable...for some people...hell, I used to drag an 8x16' travel trailer around to live in for construction jobs...small, but doable...but where are drunks/druggies going to get the $1600/month for rent like the one in your video? Fuck letting the government pay for their housing. When a person has no stake in their home, they rarely give enough of a shit to take care of it...to maintain it, to keep it up...then you end up with high-priced ghettos.
An example / tour of a tiny home.
The "tiny homes" are doable...for some people...hell, I used to drag an 8x16' travel trailer around to live in for construction jobs...small, but doable...but where are drunks/druggies going to get the $1600/month for rent like the one in your video? Fuck letting the government pay for their housing. When a person has no stake in their home, they rarely give enough of a shit to take care of it...to maintain it, to keep it up...then you end up with high-priced ghettos.
What are you talking about exactly?
We can sieve microplastics from the ocean and melt them into sheets for walls etcI don't know the specifics, but it seems that making concrete isn't good for the environment.
But what about clay? It should be extrudable and thus 3d printable. Then you fire each layer with a high energy laser. You could build the housing near dried river beds, or active rivers and ceramic is pretty hard. Not sure how it is at load bearing but I'm guessing that you could go at least 3 stories.
AFAIK, rivers are good sources of clay.
Page 2 - In a country dominated by 'fast food', why not 'fast housing' - "McHouses" for the people.
Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.forums.anandtech.com
My question is why you assume small spaces aka small homes will lead to drug users? As in what are you talking about?
Many people's ideas of homeless run with the incorrect assumption that addiction is the driver of homelessness. In fact, we can see that this is wrong by just looking at the data: states with some of the highest opioid addiction rates have the lowest homeless populations (is, West Virginia), because housing is cheap.This whole thread seems to be about building more houses with the assumption that the homeless people will be able to afford housing...drunks/drug addicts who can't pass a drug test for a job? Not so much.
Many people's ideas of homeless run with the incorrect assumption that addiction is the driver of homelessness. In fact, we can see that this is wrong by just looking at the data: states with some of the highest opioid addiction rates have the lowest homeless populations (is, West Virginia), because housing is cheap.
And good luck getting a job if you don't have an address or a reliable place to shower.
If you want to break the cycle of homelessness, we need to be building all types of housing, from SROs to luxury condos (after all, then you give a new place for richer people to move into instead of gut renovating older units that would naturally have been more affordable). We also need to approach things with a housing first model. Get people in housing, and then link them with the services they need.
Pretty sure the warmer states have higher homeless populations because of nicer weather all year round not much to do with addiction rates but I didn't stay at a Holiday Inn last night.
Which states have the highest and lowest rates of homelessness?
New York, Vermont, and Oregon have the highest rates of homelessness across the 50 states.usafacts.org
The states with the highest homelessness rates all tend to be very expensive places to live.
Considering housing prices correlate with demand, and homelessness rates correlate with housing prices, you'd be correct.The worst state in the union has the least homeless. I guess no one want's live there.
Yes, some of the worst states to live in with the highest per capita addiction rates have the lowest homeless per capita, because housing is cheap. No one wants to live in shitty states, so it becomes affordable to keep a roof over your head even when you have all sorts of personal problems that might lead to homelessness in a more expensive state.The worst state in the union has the least homeless. I guess no one want's live there.
Oddly enough, "no one wants to live there" is one of the reasons I moved there. My entire move from the San Francisco Bay Area to Mississippi is a litany of mistakes, surprises, last minuet decisions, and random events that all ended up working out well. The entire move and home buying process ended being nothing more than dumb luck.Considering housing prices correlate with demand, you'd be correct.
It's also ranked 34th in population density.
Which is another way of saying "no one wants to live there"
Ha, bet that was culture shock.Oddly enough, "no one wants to live there" is one of the reasons I moved there. My entire move from the San Francisco Bay Area to Mississippi is a litany of mistakes, surprises, last minuet decisions, and random events that all ended up working out well. The entire move and home buying process ended being nothing more than dumb luck.
That all seems correct to me. The only open question is the definition of shitty.Yes, some of the worst states to live in with the highest per capita addiction rates have the lowest homeless per capita, because housing is cheap. No one wants to live in shitty states, so it becomes affordable to keep a roof over your head even when you have all sorts of personal problems that might lead to homelessness in a more expensive state.
And as was pointed out above, price is a good way to evaluate demand, given the extreme shortage of housing in places people want to live in. Higher price = higher demand.
It was, but in a very good way. I've never been around so many polite people in my life, and I've been to Canada.Ha, bet that was culture shock.