Zionists expand military offensive in Lebanon

[straightalker]

August 11 - Yahoo News Article

This war is really heating up. Zionist nuclear submarines loaded with Sea Launched Nuclear Missiles are stalking the Iranian coast. That's of course to greatly reduce the flight time of the nuclear missiles and increase their odds of striking before any defenses can be alerted and mobilized.

Syria has nukes. Iran has nukes. Saudia Arabia has nukes. Pakistan has nukes. 2 of these Nations are hostile Islamic regimes and 2 are puppet Islamic regimes under USA Neo-fascist control.

What can the Zionists possibly gain from marching in and occupying Lebanon? Besides the wrath of 1/4 billion jihadists who are within marching distance to Israel?

It looks like the Zionist's strategy today is to put their military assets into a forward position in Lebanon for an assault on Syria. With the nukes stationed off Iran's coast to be used to shock Iran's military back into the stone age in a massive nuclear first strike consisting of dozens of strategic nukes. And no doubt hundreds of long range conventional cruize missiles fired from within Israel itself.

The Iranians/Syrians will seek help from Russia/China.

The Zionist controlled USA Congress/Senate will put our USA soldiers and our military assets into this as well.

There are a lot of respected expert analysts of the current Middle East situation who are genuinely extremely worried about the potential here for WWIII.

 

[linkgoron]

Zionists?

EDIT:
and that article is way out of date.

EDIT2:
WTF are you talking about? That article doesn't support anything you're saying.
Israel is expanding the offensive on the western part of Lebanon, not eastern. Nuclear warheads? lol

 

[spidey07]

I'd just call it stopping nazi's before it gets out of hand. It's one of those "if you don't learn from history, you'll repeat it" kind of things.

We learned what happens if you don't nip it in the bud so to speak. So this is a good thing.

:thumbsup:

oh - and we're already in WW3 in my mind. but we learned what happens from WW2 if you don't act swiftly.

 

[AyashiKaibutsu]

Originally posted by: spidey07
I'd just call it stopping nazi's before it gets out of hand. It's one of those "if you don't learn from history, you'll repeat it" kind of things.

We learned what happens if you don't nip it in the bud so to speak. So this is a good thing.

:thumbsup:

oh - and we're already in WW3 in my mind. but we learned what happens from WW2 if you don't act swiftly.

Well considering Israel appears to be intending to pull out and let a UN force move in you can't really compare them to germany that wanted to take over what it claimed was rightful land of the germans (the initial attacks they made/the ones that were appeased). Hmm taking back lands lost in fairly recent history... sounds like a different group than the Israeli.

 

[Trente]

Originally posted by: AyashiKaibutsu

Originally posted by: spidey07
I'd just call it stopping nazi's before it gets out of hand. It's one of those "if you don't learn from history, you'll repeat it" kind of things.

We learned what happens if you don't nip it in the bud so to speak. So this is a good thing.

:thumbsup:

oh - and we're already in WW3 in my mind. but we learned what happens from WW2 if you don't act swiftly.

Well considering Israel appears to be intending to pull out and let a UN force move in you can't really compare them to germany that wanted to take over what it claimed was rightful land of the germans (the initial attacks they made/the ones that were appeased). Hmm taking back lands lost in fairly recent history... sounds like a different group than the Israeli.

You've misunderstood him completely. He is comparing Hizbollah tactics to Nazi tactics.

 

[AyashiKaibutsu]

Originally posted by: Trente

Originally posted by: AyashiKaibutsu

Originally posted by: spidey07
I'd just call it stopping nazi's before it gets out of hand. It's one of those "if you don't learn from history, you'll repeat it" kind of things.

We learned what happens if you don't nip it in the bud so to speak. So this is a good thing.

:thumbsup:

oh - and we're already in WW3 in my mind. but we learned what happens from WW2 if you don't act swiftly.

Well considering Israel appears to be intending to pull out and let a UN force move in you can't really compare them to germany that wanted to take over what it claimed was rightful land of the germans (the initial attacks they made/the ones that were appeased). Hmm taking back lands lost in fairly recent history... sounds like a different group than the Israeli.

You've misunderstood him completely. He is comparing Hizbollah tactics to Nazi tactics.

My bad. From how I read it, it seems he was talking about the appeasement of germany just before WW2 went into full swing, which would seem to imply that Israel at the moment is making a grab for territory. I wasn't disagreeing with the general ideas he was saying, but from my misunderstanding I disagreed with the immediate application of it.

 

[straightalker]

I currently just so happen to be studying a ten hour excellent documentary on WWI. Yes that's WWI as in 1914. The War to end all wars as it was nicknamed at the time. Anyhow, a lot of lessons could be learned from WWI about the critical importance of containing regional military aggression before it can get the chance to spark a wildfire that rages out of control.

In WWI, Nations piled into the war without even having good reason to. None of the major powers were attacked during the time preceeding that war. It was a domino effect. As each Nation on one side of the conflict piled into the war, another Nation on the opposite side felt the urge to jump in.

The primary thing to note about the battles of WWI was the fact no major battle in Europe had been fought in 40 years. The technology of warfare had leaped forward in that time to machine guns, heavy gunned battleships and awesome field artillery bombardment capability. This resulted in both sides suffering huge casualties. The most casualties still to this day of any war in human history.

Back the trhe Middle East of today. The people of the World have been conned by the Zionists and also Neo Fascist like Cheney that the use of strategic nukes is ok. WWIII will now be like WWI. The battlefield firepower has been insanely upgraded once again. The result will be absolutely horrific beyond our present understanding of warfare. As was the case after WWI.

 

[linkgoron]

Originally posted by: straightalker
I currently just so happen to be studying a ten hour excellent documentary on WWI. Yes that's WWI as in 1914. The War to end all wars as it was nicknamed at the time. Anyhow, a lot of lessons could be learned from WWI about the critical importance of containing regional military aggression before it can get the chance to spark a wildfire that rages out of control.

In WWI, Nations piled into the war without even having good reason to. None of the major powers were attacked during the time preceeding that war. It was a domino effect. As each Nation on one side of the conflict piled into the war, another Nation on the opposite side felt the urge to jump in.

The primary thing to note about the battles of WWI was the fact no major battle in Europe had been fought in 40 years. The technology of warfare had leaped forward in that time to machine guns, heavy gunned battleships and awesome field artillery bombardment capability. This resulted in both sides suffering huge casualties. As each side adjusted to both using and also avoiding being on the recieving end of the new awesome firepower.

Back the trhe Middle East of today. The people of the World have been conned by the Zionists and Neo Fascist that the use of strategic nukes is ok. WWIII will now be like WWI. The battlefield firepower has been insanely upgraded once again. The result will be absolutely horrific beyond our present understanding of warfare. As was the case after WWI.

What nukes? WTF are you talking about?

Oh we also learned from WW1 that unless you defeat a country completely (that is, defeat in war, and army, not in actualy destruction) then you can expect another war later on.

 

[BoberFett]

Maybe if you did something other than prattle on about zionists, neo-fascists, and other meaningless rhetoric that served no other purpose than to troll, you might have a valid conversation. Awww, who am I kidding. You're a troll and serve no other purpose.

 

[Harabec]

What are you smoking?
Someone reading this thread could think we're about to take on the entire world and the middle east will be a wasteland in 2 days.

The truth is that right now we're doing whatever we can while waiting for the cease-fire agreement to finalise.
possibly monday or tuesday, with the UN saying it could get Lebanese and UNIFIL forces within a week.

 

[IrateLeaf]

Originally posted by: straightalker
August 11 - Yahoo News Article

This war is really heating up. Zionist nuclear submarines loaded with Sea Launched Nuclear Missiles are stalking the Iranian coast. That's of course to greatly reduce the flight time of the nuclear missiles and increase their odds of striking before any defenses can be alerted and mobilized.

Syria has nukes. Iran has nukes. Saudia Arabia has nukes. Pakistan has nukes. 2 of these Nations are hostile Islamic regimes and 2 are puppet Islamic regimes under USA Neo-fascist control.

What can the Zionists possibly gain from marching in and occupying Lebanon? Besides the wrath of 1/4 billion jihadists who are within marching distance to Israel?

It looks like the Zionist's strategy today is to put their military assets into a forward position in Lebanon for an assault on Syria. With the nukes stationed off Iran's coast to be used to shock Iran's military back into the stone age in a massive nuclear first strike consisting of dozens of strategic nukes. And no doubt hundreds of long range conventional cruize missiles fired from within Israel itself.

The Iranians/Syrians will seek help from Russia/China.

The Zionist controlled USA Congress/Senate will put our USA soldiers and our military assets into this as well.

There are a lot of respected expert analysts of the current Middle East situation who are genuinely extremely worried about the potential here for WWIII.

Straightalker as much as I disagree with your points your entitled to them.
I could see where you were coming from. Even though I disagreed.
In this areticle you have totally read things into the article that just are not there.
I saw no direct or indirect mention of nuclear weapons.
Also if I may - Israel has always had their submarines lurking off the waters of there neighbors.
Excellent article -- http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/sub/index.html
Hell - even the United states and Soviet union have nuclear submarines lurking just off the coasts of our respective nations.
yet there was not one word mentioned in that article about any sort of nuclear weapons.
Nice try though.