Zero: An Investigation Into 9/11

[HannibalX]

It's easy to attack the presentation as an excuse to ignore the substance of an argument.

You mean like you did with my post? I'll just post it again since you didn't read it the first time around.

...

It's hard to take the video seriously when the first five minutes attempt to produce an emotional response in the viewer which could affect their judgment on any material presented from there on out. All of the 9-11 conspiracy videos start the same way. People in a compromised emotional state are more willing to believe anything that may explain the events in a way which the anger, aggression and depression they are feeling can applied to a person or group of people who are ?in charge?. Basically meaning, it gives people someone to blame so that they don?t have to accept that someone or something outside of their influence or government can actually effect them.

 

[kylebisme]

I read your post, and my response was directed at that. Again, you are taking issue with the presentation of Zero, while ignoring the many facts it presents.

 

[Number1]

It's easy to attack the presentation as an excuse to ignore the substance of an argument.

That said perhaps you'd be willing to give a critique of National Geographic's 9/11: Science & Conspiracy? The presentation, and the substance too if you are up for it.

I just watch this documentary. The twuthers come out looking like a bunch of loons. The documentary reaches the correct conclusion. Twuthers and the rest of us will NEVER agree as to what really happened.

And that should be the end of the thread

 

[kylebisme]

Number, did you not notice any "attempt to produce an emotional response in the viewer which could affect their judgment" in that National Geographic program?

 

[LunarRay]

kylebisme is a troll, pure and imple, and an ignorant troll at that. His pretenses and bluster are plain for all to see yet he continues to yammer endlessly as if he's proven one single bit of his claim. Like most truthers, when he shown to be wrong on an issue he ignores it and switches gears to another subject, all while bitching that nobody is staying on topic.

Since he can't provide any of the proper math to demonstrate his claim in the other thread, and because this thread presents nothing but a rehash of the same old well-debunked stupor troofer distortions, bad physics, and outright lies, maybe it's time to lock both threads as they are going nowhere? kylebisme is nothing else but more of the same truther lame.

How about a deal.... When NIST provides the math to their assertion then the truther's either agree to it or provide their's... Let's start with the WTC 7's SIM data. Then we can move on to the other stuff.