DrMrLordX
Lifer
- Apr 27, 2000
- 23,160
- 13,254
- 136
It's not 300W it's 250W PL1
And what's the expected PL2 value? 250W PL1 is VERY VERY HIGH.
and as for tiles the most optimal thing should be reducing the die size of the Tile while keeping it 8+16 having two 8-12 Coyote Cove tiles would have been worse for perf/mm2.
That's Intel's problem, isn't it? One of the many reasons why people are now turning to AMD CPUs (and why Zen7 is so hotly anticipated) is that they can sell a P core that doesn't suffer from as much area bloat.
It's not desperation but careful planning
Everything Intel does now smacks of desperation. They react rather than act, and they are hemmed in by the dysfunction of their fabs and design teams.
For a lot of users of the NVL-S 52C CPU of course. I thought that was obvious from the context.
That's going to be such a vanishingly small number of people that it's not even worth discussing them here in this Zen7 thread. That SKU is likely to be rare as hen's teeth.
AMD will go 32C/64T on DT with Zen7, so you can be pretty sure Intel will try to counter that with more than 48C/48T.
Intel is going to (eventually) roll out unified core and rethink their entire game. Maybe by then it'll be worth going wide on core count.
Is it really necessary to segregate the forum this way today?
It's a basic rule that if someone creates a thread about X, that you not derail that topic of dicussion by discussing Y instead.
It's irritating to have to filter through endless posts about Nova Lake to get to actual Zen6/Zen7 discussion. If it was just a few posts I wouldn't care, but it's non-stop. I think certain users post about Nova Lake 48 core in the Zen6/7 threads because they want to argue, and it degrades the quality of the discussion on this forum. If that makes me a snowflake, then I'm a snowflake.
You aren't alone in that.
