- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,747
- 6,598
- 136
It will be. In TurinSo is zen 5 good yet?
I don't care about Turin, just want the x3d part to be extremely good.It will be. In Turin
The Turin is the basis for all DT parts, including the x3d parts. You want Turin to be good, just less power, and it will be.I don't care about Turin, just want the x3d part to be extremely good.
So if you were going to build on AM5 with Z5, would you go for the 670E or see what 870E brings from the Mobo makers?
- X870E is a renamed X670E with mandatory USB4 capabilities, which costs 4 lanes.
- X870 is a renamed B650E (just one Promontory chip), so just 8 additional lanes from the start, and it also has mandatory USB4
These guys are just f'n with us now. New 9700X run. 3395 , 16909. This is a decent showcase, but who knows what trickery was used to achieve it. I hate Geekbench. +16.5% ST, +10.7% MT vs official 7700X scores in the browser.
Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7D75 - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7D75 with an AMD Ryzen 7 9700X processor.browser.geekbench.com
That is just probably high OCThese guys are just f'n with us now. New 9700X run. 3395 , 16909. This is a decent showcase, but who knows what trickery was used to achieve it. I hate Geekbench. +16.5% ST, +10.7% MT vs official 7700X scores in the browser.
Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7D75 - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7D75 with an AMD Ryzen 7 9700X processor.browser.geekbench.com
That is just probably high OC
Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 runs: Fully stock 7950X, 6000C30 EXPO (no high bandwidth, no low latency modes).
In the screenshots of the 9950X, it's clearly using a number more watts for uncore, giving the cores fewer watts than in my case. Might be because it's an ES, might be because of whatever weird tuning has been done with it.So that would put ZEN5 exactly where i expected it in terms of efficiency. Something between "basically same as ZEN4" and "same clock at same power -> ~16% faster at same power".
Thanks for comparison 👍Blender Benchmark 3.3.0 runs: Fully stock 7950X, 6000C30 EXPO (no high bandwidth, no low latency modes).
When comparing these scores to the 7950X3D runs here, I think we need to bear in mind the 7950X was very sloppy with the V/F curve, taking a hammer to it to get max boost clocks at whatever the power cost. The 7950X3D is, comparatively, extremely stringently tuned with regards to V/F curve and will manage to boost higher clocks under all circumstances until the 7950X exceeds its power draw considerably.
This is a launch day 7950X sample. Its possible they improved the V/F curve since launch in newer samples. But I think this is a fair comparison to the alleged 9950X. Much more so than an incredibly-finely-tuned-out-of-the-box 7950X3D.
60W PPT
View attachment 102787
90W PPT
View attachment 102788
120W PPT
View attachment 102789
230W PPT (Stock)
View attachment 102790
It's the first run with High performance power plan. Might explain the higher score.These guys are just f'n with us now. New 9700X run. 3395 , 16909. This is a decent showcase, but who knows what trickery was used to achieve it. I hate Geekbench. +16.5% ST, +10.7% MT vs official 7700X scores in the browser.
Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7D75 - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7D75 with an AMD Ryzen 7 9700X processor.browser.geekbench.com
Probably just variance, you can go a few pages back where I've posted several runs of GB6 with 200 pts of difference between the best and worst for ST score. And 6% of difference is enough to claim crushing victory over your foe on wccf and vcn comments section, mind you!High performance power plan. Might explain the higher score.
Variance is an annoying part of GB6, yes.Probably just variance, you can go a few pages back where I've posted several runs of GB6 with 200 pts of difference between the best and worst for ST score. And 6% of difference is enough to claim crushing victory over your foe on wccf and vcn comments section, mind you!
Nothing to do with high performance power plan as such, that s just a MSI set up, previous GB scores where with an Asus board that could well be using the same settings and TDP.It's the first run with High performance power plan. Might explain the higher score.
Since it isn't expected to sell well, please please tell me who do I contact at AMD to give me a free 9600X?In other news: canada-pc only ordered 50 six cores from AMD
FFS how many times do I have to run this benchmark!View attachment 102817
60W: https://forums.anandtech.com/thread...ranite-ridge-ryzen-9000.2607350/post-41246800
90W: https://forums.anandtech.com/thread...ranite-ridge-ryzen-9000.2607350/post-41248191
120W: https://forums.anandtech.com/thread...ranite-ridge-ryzen-9000.2607350/post-41248591
View attachment 102819
Speculation: AMD has implemented n PPT levels with max n value depending on how crazy the mobo power circuitry isFFS how many times do I have to run this benchmark!
230W PPT when?