Zap's ECS NFORCE4-A754 mini review

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
2
81
ECS NFORCE4-A939 MINI REVIEW

CLIFFNOTES VERSION:
Very inexpensive as a Fry's bundle and works exactly as it should. This board is a reasonable value for the price. For being "free" with CPU makes it a very worthwhile board. Not as attractive if purchasing on its own with better boards in similar price bracket. Decent overclocking. No Smart Fan.

OVERVIEW:


The point of this "mini review" is to give people an idea of what they can expect when purchasing one of these since most reviewers tend to ignore "bottom feeder" motherboards such as this one.

I went to Fry's Electronics on 4/25 and picked up this board along with an OEM Paris core Sempron 3100+ for $79.99 plus tax. I don't know if they just didn't have many of these boards or if they're selling quick because it was just in the ad from the day before and I had to wait about 10 minutes while two guys searched high and low for the board, finally finding one hidden behind some other boards. I'm accustomed to Fry's having stacks of the "combo sale" motherboards and indeed the other boards that are typically on sale in the combos were stacked all around. I also picked up a PNY 512MB PC3200 module with it for $39.99 - $20MIR. The board detected the PNY memory at DDR400 CAS 2.5.

MOTHERBOARD FEATURES:

Nforce4-4X chipset
1X PCIe 16X
2X PCIe 1X
3X PCI
3X DDR
4X SATA
5.1 Audio
10/100/1000 NIC
3 sets of USB headers plus 4 ports in rear, total 10 ports.
Phoenix/Award BIOS v1.0b (shipped version)

The board is a bit above basic. No firewire, no 7.1 audio, but most other things people need/want.

FIRST IMPRESSIONS

This board reminds me of the NFORCE4-A939 and indeed there is much resemblence between the two with similar chipset, similar model designation, similar layout and similar BIOS (including limitations, more later).

This board takes the nice layout of the socket 939 version and makes it even better. Similarities: The location of the 4 pin ATX +12v plug is right behind the PS/2 ports right at the edge of the PCB so that the wires do not have to cross over the CPU area. The 24 pin ATX plug is along the edge of the PCB by the RAM and just below it, also along the edge are the IDE ports. The three sets of USB headers are right along the bottom edge just past the front panel headers.

Differences: The Nforce4-4X chipset may be just a hair farther away from the PCI-E 16x slot which is nice because on the socket 939 board the chipset HSF is at an angle and one corner of it almost hits the video card. This board puts the chipset HSF a bit farther away. Also, the SATA ports are between the chipset and the edge of the PCB as with the socket 939 board, but since this board is narrower by a hair the SATA headers are even closer to the edge. Last, for fans of floppy drives, the FDD port is along the edge of the PCB between the SATA ports and the bottom corner. Not the ideal place, but much better than the location of the FDD port on the socket 939 board (under the last PCI slot).

The chipset fan is pretty noisy and spins at 5800RPM. The good news is that it easily clears the PCIe 16x slot so if your video card doesn't have anything sticking out the back of it, you can replace the HSF with a large passive heatsink. Note that this heatsink is held on by wire hooks like those found on some Pentium 4 boards that look like the end of a paper clip sticking through the board. I want to mention this because it seems as if most of the chipset heatsinks are held on by push pins with springs and this one is different.

The CPU socket is far enough away from the top edge of the board and away from the chipset HSF (with PCIe 16x slot below the chipset HSF). The closest tall object would be the first RAM stick, which is about 1" away from a retail box HSF (from Sempron 2600+).

The board can be used with a 20 pin ATX power supply. Indeed there's a sticker over the extra 4 pins that has to be removed to use a "proper" 24 pin power supply.

BIOS:

The board comes with BIOS version 1.0b with a limit of 250MHz HTT/FSB. Latest on the ECS web site is 1.1a so I flashed to latest version. Latest version raises the FSB/HTT limit to 400MHz, a higher number than any stock board can attain. I can't see any other major changes in CMOS setup.

The BIOS is the typical Phoenix/Award type that many boards use. It has all the "typical" settings and doesn't explicitly try to hide settings like some boards I've seen. I thought the previous ECS board I used, the NFORCE3-A had a lot of "enthusiast" options for an ECS but this one has even better voltage settings.

Advanced Chipset Features:
- clock speed from 200-400MHz in 1MHz increments
+++ (0.5MHz increments between 201-210MHz, 2MHz increments between 230-248MHz and perhaps other oddities)
- HT Frequency from 1-4x (default 4X)
- Memclock settings of 100/133/166/200MHz
- 1T/2T timing setting
- CAS latency 2/2.5/3
- CPU voltage from default to +375mV in 25mV increments
- DDR voltage defaults to 2.63v and goes from 2.55v to 3.11v in 0.08v increments

Power Management Setup:
-AMD K8 Cool'n'Quiet contro Auto/Disable [SIC]
-Hammer Fid control StartUp, 4-9 in ½ multiplier increments (9x is default on my CPU)

Yes you read this right. The Vcore will go to 0.375v above default in small increments, meaning a 1.40v CPU can be pushed to 1.775v!!! Not something you'd want to do on an everyday basis. Somewhat more useful is memory voltage to 3.11v, good for running RAM at full 1:1 speeds and low latencies on an overclock.

OVERCLOCKING RESULTS:

My goal was to see first how high HTT the board can go, and second how high MHz my processor can go.

First, high HTT. To achieve this, I minimized all other aspects by lowering memory to 133MHz setting, lowering HT Frequency to 3X and lowering Hammer Fid to 6X. I verified that system booted at a 1200MHz underclock with memory running DDR266. Knowing that furballi had a 289MHz HTT POST limit in his BIOS, I had a goal. Testing at 260MHz and successfully POSTed. Bumped to 280MHz and no POST. Okay. Reset BIOS and bump to 270MHz and no POST. Huh? Back down to 260MHz and bumping it up 5MHz at a time and it surpasses 270MHz. Seems like it doesn't like to have a high HTT slapped on it. Gotta sweet talk it a bit before it'll give me the goods. 275MHz worked. 280MHz, no POST. Strange, even underclocked I was unable to reach over 275MHz HTT POST (in 5MHz increments). Fiddled with various settings, no joy... until I raised CPU vcore.

I remembered that the PC Health Status reported CPU voltage as being a bit under spec, so I bumped it an arbitrary 100mV so the CPU gets 1.50v, or a reported 1.45-1.47v. Now I was easily able to get higher HTT. My only explanation for this is that the CPU needed voltage for the overclocked interface regardless of core clock. So now I worked my way up to 285MHz, then 289MHz HTT. At 6X Hammer Fid the CPU is still underclocked a hair at 1734MHz. Time to try 290MHz.

Nope. Just as furballi experienced, no POST at 290MHz HTT and above. Since we find this behavior on more than one board and it is at such an exact setting, the logical explanation would be a BIOS limitation.

The next step is to find maximum clock on the CPU that came with the board (though this review is on the board). Leaving settings of HT at 3X and memory at 133MHz, letting Hammer Fid go full blast at 9X and CPU overvolted, the first step was an easy 240MHz HTT. I did find another oddity in the BIOS. +125mV gave me the same voltage as +100mV in PC Health Status, but +150mV gave me 0.05v over +100/125mV. So, I left it on +150mV which detects at 1.50-1.52v.

My plan is to find highest POST speed, and then start testing for stability. 260MHz HTT, 2340MHz core. 270MHz HTT for 2430MHz and no POST. Time to get medieval on the voltage! Bump up to +175mV and again, doesn't detect at any more voltage than at +150mV, plus saving on exit and system powered off. Okay, NEED MORE VOLTAGE!!! +200mV gives me a detected 1.55-1.57v. 265MHz HTT for 2385, no sweat. Go to 270MHz, save and exit and board powered off again. Powering on, no POST. Looks like this Paris core CPU doesn't like to go over 2.4GHz, just like the one before it (came with NFORCE3-A bundle, tested on excellent Biostar Tforce6100 board).

Final settings:
HTT 260MHz
Core 2340MHz (detected 2347MHz)
+150mV vcore
Memory 166MHz (detected DDR426, CAS 3)
2.79v vDIMM

Tests stable at these settings. Note that I had occasional strange occurances of the board shutting itself off while exiting BIOS or hitting the reset switch. This only happened when highly overclocked even if the overclock seems stable (running various software torture tests).

POSSIBLE FUTURE TESTING

Might be stable at lower voltages or lower latencies.

Haven't tested for possible USB 2.0 lockups/BSOD under Windows as experienced on the socket 939 version.

CONCLUSION:

Very inexpensive as a Fry's bundle and works exactly as it should. This board is a reasonable value for the price. For being "free" with CPU makes it a very worthwhile board.

Unless you are an extreme overclocker or have a CPU with a low multiplier, this board is a reasonable choice.

For quiet freaks the placement of the Nforce4 chipset allows for easy replacement using a large passive heatsink though the hoop mouning instead of pin mounting makes it less universal. Also, lack of Smart Fan is an undesireable oversight.

If you are wanting a budget Nforce4 motherboard and do not need frills, this is a great choice. People wanting a budget build and getting this with a CPU as a cheap Fry's bundle need not shop for another motherboard.

If you were out shopping for the board by itself, makes for a tougher sell because you can get the decent Biostar Geforce6100-M7 board for around the same price which will give near the same overclock plus have decent integrated graphics, or for around $10 more you can get the most excellent Biostar Tforce6100 board which will absolutely overclock better (as a board, CPU dependent) and has features like user programmable Smart Fan. Also, the Biostar boards are passively cooled.

Note that clockgen will get around the BIOS HTT/FSB limitations.
 

furballi

Banned
Apr 6, 2005
2,482
0
0
I also encountered stability issue at high overclock speed with the ECS NF4 754. If the CPU is NOT 100% stable, then the board will lock-up or reboot (early warning system). My 3100 Sempron is bullet-proof at 2.44GHz. This board starts to complain when I push the CPU core speed above 2.46GHz. The PC will boot and run Super Pi/Prime95 at 2.53GHz, but it may also BSOD at any time during testing.

I would recommend that you retest with a Sempron 2800 (winchester or venice core) known to be stable @ 2.4GHz or higher. There should not be any anomaly up to 289MHz, the upper limit of the BIOS.

I can run my Kingston ValueRam at 166 speed, 2.63Vdimm, and 2.5-3-3-6-1T up to 232MHz speed with this board. The ECS NF3 754 permits 2T timing only with the Kingston VR.

Please run the the USB 2.0 test when you have the time. I don't have a high-speed USB device for testing.
 

furballi

Banned
Apr 6, 2005
2,482
0
0
As noted in a previous post, this board is superior to the ECS NF3 754 because it requires less voltage to run the same CPU at the same core speed (cooler-running power module). It is also more compatible with VALUE RAMs. Finally, it can easily push the Sempron 2800 up to 289MHz FSB in BIOS (no Clockgen). You shouldn't have any problem pushing your 9x, 10x, or perhaps 11x multiplier Sempron/A64 to its limit with this board. The ECS NF3 board faulters at 264MHz with Clockgen.

Many value to mid-range NF4 boards come with a noisy NF4 chipset fan. The best solution is to spend $3 on a Zalman chipset cooler. Simply move the stock spring clip from the NF4 chipset cooler to the Zalman. Easy cheap noiseless solution in less than 5 minutes. The stock spring clip also provide better clampling force than most spring-loaded push-pins.

It will take some tweakings to dial-in that perfect set up due to the un-refined BIOS. Fortunately, the BIOS contains all the essential parameters to drive the majority of Semprons/A64s to its full potential.

Personally, I would limit Vcore to +200mV to prevent noobs from frying the CPU. The Vdimm should be raised from 3.1V to 3.5V to drive those Samsung chips.

There are several temperature sensors on this NF4 board. The CPU sensor is useable (accurate to within 5C). The other sensors are worthless. The NF3 board has the same sensors, but its outputs are dead-on, with the exception of case temperature. I suspect the NF4 BIOS is the problem.

Pros:
- price (with Fry's combo special)
- stability
- good overclock
- good layout
- PCI-E x16 and x1
- cool running board
- high quality capacitors at the power module
- 3rd RAM slot
- three fan headers

Cons:
- unrefined BIOS
- noisy chipset fan
- no SMART fan control
- no 1394
- no speaker out pins
- no single beep to confirm boot
- no BIOS update in DOS mode (floppy)
- no space between PCI-E x16 and PCI slots
 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
2
81
Originally posted by: furballi
The best solution is to spend $3 on a Zalman chipset cooler. Simply move the stock spring clip from the NF4 chipset cooler to the Zalman.

ClubIT Zalman chipset cooler $3 free shipping

Couple of comments on what furballi said:

- noisy chipset fan
Any chipset fan is noisy by definition, but this one wasn't as bad as some that I've seen/heard. My CPU fan running at full speed was noisier. Of course anyone making a "silent" computer will not find the fan suitable, but otherwise most won't notice it over their stock CPU fan.

- no speaker out pins
There's a speaker onboard - good 'nuff for me.

- no single beep to confirm boot
Now that you mention it, I guess it doesn't. However, keyboard lights will flash just prior to successful POST.

- no BIOS update in DOS mode (floppy)
I was able to update BIOS in DOS. I didn't use a floppy but instead have a hard drive that boots up directly into DOS. I will hook the hard drive up to my main system using a USB adaptor to copy over the files into a subdirectory on it, then transfer the drive to whichever motherboard I'm going to flash the BIOS on, and boot up on the drive and flash the BIOS from DOS. It worked fine for me.
 

furballi

Banned
Apr 6, 2005
2,482
0
0
I don't know why the onboard speaker doesn't beep during boot. It works during PC lock-up.

Okay, so I'm too critical on the ECS NF4 754 board. This may be the best value NF4 754 PCI-E board on the market if you don't need OBV or run the CPU above 289MHz. Top speed is at least 303MHz with Clockgen. The only major missing ingredients are dual-core support and dual-channel memory support.


@ ZAP,

Can you retest with Clockgen and the Sempron CPU that managed +330MHz on the Biostar Tforce?
 

Idex

Senior member
Oct 18, 1999
435
0
0
I must say it took more time to clean off the old thermal paste than it did to install the Zalman on the Chipset.
 

furballi

Banned
Apr 6, 2005
2,482
0
0
Are you talking about the pink "goo" between the cooler and the NF4 device? I replaced the chipset cooler after 3 minutes of use...no time for the "goo" to stick to the NF4 chipset. Have you encountered any problem with this board?

Would be nice to slap on an A64 3000 Venice 754 with 10x multiplier to see how high this thing will go.
 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
2
81
Originally posted by: furballi
Okay, so I'm too critical on the ECS NF4 754 board. This may be the best value NF4 754 PCI-E board on the market...

Can you retest with Clockgen and the Sempron CPU that managed +330MHz on the Biostar Tforce?

It is the BEST value when purchased as part of a bundle. Alone, it runs almost $60 at Newegg and there are a few other worthy choices around that price. The Tforce6100 runs only $70 and that's my top socket 754 choice right now regardless of price (yes, I've fiddled with the LANPARTY NF3 s754 board BITD, good but too expensive). Paying $40-50 more for a "better" motherboard is a tough choice to make, but only $10-12 more for tangible benefits of known better overclocking and user adjustable Smart Fan plus one of the best IGP on the market...

As for retesting, know that I do most of my testing outside of the case and using UBCD (has various CPU and memory tests) so I don't even have Windows installed. That Sempron 2600+ needed obscene voltage to hit those high speeds and that was mainly for suicide runs. :Q Seriously I wouldn't run a 90nm CPU at 1.65V+ for that long. That Sempron is in my HTPC so I'm reluctant to yank it out. Hmmm, perhaps I can "borrow" the E3 core Sempron 3300+ from my other gaming rig and lower the multiplier...
 

Idex

Senior member
Oct 18, 1999
435
0
0
Originally posted by: furballi
Are you talking about the pink "goo" between the cooler and the NF4 device? .

Yep, Maybe I should have fired it up for a little bit to see if the goo will loose when heated. I switched the heatsinks before installing the MB.

 

furballi

Banned
Apr 6, 2005
2,482
0
0
Isopropyl alcohol work fine for me. I have "reagent" grade IPA (99% purity), but the 70% stuff should also work. Use a Q-tip and wooden toothpick to remove the goo.

I try to avoid AMD CPUs with 8x multiplier. IMHO, 754 boards do best with 166 RAM speed. Dropping the RAM speed to 133 will cost about 40MHz CPU core speed (all other variables constant). There is no need to push the "better" Semprons (+3000) beyond 285MHz FSB because most will run out of gas around 2.6 to 2.7GHz.

The ECS NF4 754 comes with two extra SATA ports, one extra DIMM slot, one extra PCI-E 1x slot, and one extra PCI slot. The smaller caps on this board are made by OST and G-Luxon (not the best). Dunno if the BIOSTAR is also equipped with some OSTs and G-Luxons.

$90 is my upper limit for a 754 MB and CPU. The goal is to get the most performance with very little $. I cannot comment on the D/A video converter used in the Tforce. However, based on my experience, my LD90+ always look better with DVI input, even with 2D stuffs. For me, the main benefit of the Tforce is the Smartfan option. Speedfan doesn't work with the ECS NF4 754 board.

I have the big Zalman 7700Cu and the Antec SLK3000B. Currently, the Zalman is set at a fixed 959 rpm. At this speed, the CPU cooler is inaudible at 1/2 meter. The maximum CPU temp is around 46C with 75F ambient.

The ECS NF4 754 also comes with two additional SATA ports, one DIMM slot, one PCI-E 1x slot, and one PCI slot.

 

Idex

Senior member
Oct 18, 1999
435
0
0
So I just got my video card last night and upgraded my bios last night. Has anyone noticed that the startup takes longer with the new BIOS? It seems to wait 5 seconds before it detects all the drives. Should I turn off the auto detection of the drives?
 

furballi

Banned
Apr 6, 2005
2,482
0
0
Mine is fast (23 to 25 seconds from power activation to desktop). I disable unused SATA 1 and 2, set HDD as 1st boot (DISABLE other boot items like floppy, CD ROM, etc), and remove unwanted items from MSCONFIG (especially those proggies related to the video processor). I believe your delay is caused by the video processors. Retest with your old video processor. If the boot time is faster, then you've isolated your problem.

I restored the old BIOS for a quick test. No change in boot time (within a second or two of the new BIOS).
 

Idex

Senior member
Oct 18, 1999
435
0
0
Thanks, I'll try disabling the SATA devices. I don't think it's the video card because I didn't have a PCI-e card until yesterday. Yesterday was the first time I turned the computer on :).
 

Idex

Senior member
Oct 18, 1999
435
0
0
There was setting in the BIOS "hard drive delay" or something like that. It was set at 15 and i changed it to 0 and disabled all the devices I am not using. Bootups are much faster now.

I can confirm that I'm seeing the same jumps in voltages as zap (some voltages don't actually make a change).

 

furballi

Banned
Apr 6, 2005
2,482
0
0
Same here. The default time should be 0, not 15 seconds.

I'm running Firefox. When I open 30 pages simultaneously, Firefox may not be able to render a few pages. Said server not found. Reloading the webpage will fix the problem. I did not encounter this problem with the old NF3 board. Clean install of FF but still the same problem.
 

Idex

Senior member
Oct 18, 1999
435
0
0
Quick Report... so far i'm stable at 260 at +150mv and 2.71 vDIMM at 166Mhz. I've tried higer but I get errors when running Prime95. At 270 it locks up. I tried more voltage +200mv but it still locks up. I haven't tried any more voltage after that.

Oh and the proc I received had the x86-64 instructions.
 

furballi

Banned
Apr 6, 2005
2,482
0
0
Fixed the FF issue by deleting the Mozilla folder (created a new profile).

My chip will do 275MHz at +125mVcore and stock Vdimm (166/2.5-3-6-1T, 3x HT). Maximum Vcore as reported by CPUz is 1.48VDC. I set the final FSB sped to 270MHz to compensate for change in case temperature. The average working range for this processor is 2.3 to 2.5GHz.

The NF4 chipset puts out serious heat! May need to add an 80mm Panaflo at 7VDC to blow on the chipset and GPU heatsinks.

Any issue with the built-in network chip? My rig is connected to the internet via wireless network.
 

Peter

Elite Member
Oct 15, 1999
9,640
1
0
Originally posted by: Idex
There was setting in the BIOS "hard drive delay" or something like that. It was set at 15 and i changed it to 0 and disabled all the devices I am not using. Bootups are much faster now.

The hard drive init delay does nothing unless your harddisks actually require spinup delays - the value is a timeout. If the HDD is ready earlier, then things continue instantly.
 

Idex

Senior member
Oct 18, 1999
435
0
0
Originally posted by: furballi
Any issue with the built-in network chip? My rig is connected to the internet via wireless network.

I'm using the gigbit eithernet and it works fine for me.

 

furballi

Banned
Apr 6, 2005
2,482
0
0
Great. Had a chance to run some load tests with this rig.

ECS NF4 754, 3100 Sempron Paris at 270MHz FSB (2.43GHz), 1 Samsung floppy, 1 NEC 3550A DVD burner, 1 Seagate 7200.8 250GB PATA HDD, 2 120mm Panaflos, 1 Zalman 7700Cu, GeForce 6500 PCI-E, PCI wireless receiver, and Enermax EG495P-VE V2.0 (tested min 81% efficient)

+5.4W...off/standby (PSU switch OFF)
+11.2W...off/standby (PSU switch ON)
+115W...idle, Cool n Quiet ON (1.184Vcore at 1350MHz core speed)
+132W...idle, Cool n Quiet OFF (1.488Vcore at 2430MHz core speed)
+212W...100% CPU load with Prime95 Max Heat and DVD/Nero Recode transcoding movie

Measurements obtained with calibrated Fluke ammeter connected to AC line.

Multiply by 0.81 to obtain actual load used by PC.

This rig boots faster than the ECS NF3 754 because the BIOS is running at 270MHz FSB instead of 250MHz FSB when loading WXP Pro. Total boot time from power application to Desktop is 23.5 seconds.

I've adjusted the Zalman 7700Cu CPU cooler to spin at a FIXED 959rpm regardless of CPU temperature. No noise and no need for SMART FAN. Max CPU temperature is 49C in 77F room.

This board works right out of the box without the need to load SATA drivers. It is also a good overclocking board (289MHz with 8x multiplier AMD Semprons) if you gently bump up the FSB and/or Vcore. There's a jumper to lock the BIOS once the proper parameters are entered. No problem running my Kingston VR or Corsair VS at 2.5-3-3-6-1T. The slower Kingston modules pass Memtest86 @ 235MHz RAM speed.

There should be sufficient bells and whistles to satisfy most users. Fans of 1394 should invest in a PCI adaptor card.

Once dialed-in, this board is as stable as the best offerings from Asus and MSI.
 

Idex

Senior member
Oct 18, 1999
435
0
0
What are you guys using to monitor temps? When I use SpeedFan some of the tempture readings are all over the place. For example, Temp 2-3 seems to jumps from very low (13C) to very high (60C+) and vice versa. I think "Remote: is the CPU temp and "Local" is the case temp. HD0 is obviously the HD temp. Anyone know what the other readings are?
 

furballi

Banned
Apr 6, 2005
2,482
0
0
In speed fan:

-Remote...CPU
-HD0...HDD
-Local...PWM (MOSFETs)
-Temp1...Case?
-Temp1 ACPI...Ambient?

The temperature sensors on this board is not very accurate.
 

skillyho

Golden Member
Nov 6, 2005
1,337
0
76
I have the same motherboard, and it's been nothing but great for me. I built this machine last November and it's been running hard ever since. The only way to get an accurate CPU temp reading is either the BIOS....durrr....or using the NTune Monitor software. When I use speedfan it would *seem* that the "Remote" temp is also the CPU temp too. I've always had high temp problems with this motherboard. I'm not sure if it's the sensor, or the IHS on my particular chip. With stock volts at stock HTT I run around 38 idle and 52 load (retail cooler). I've had this Sempy 2800+ running at 2.2 (275 HTT) with 3x Multi for the past few months on stock volts at 39 idle and 55 load. This is with PROPERLY applied AS5 and a Artic Cooling Silencer 64 92mm cooler. (16.99 @ ZipZoomFly w/free shipping)

No matter what I do I can never get a successful POST over 279HTT and Clockgen hits the same wall. All of this is of course on 1.1a BIOS. The BIOS that shipped on the board wouldn't let me POST on anything higher than 222.

I also have another 754 rig (3100+ on BiostarTForce 6100) at 2.5Ghz completely stable on 1.5V and I've been tempted to just switch chips to get a few extra MHz out of the ECS mobo since the 3100+ has the 9x mutli, and let that Biostar work it's high HTT magic on my 2800+. I've been up to 2.8Ghz on the Biostar with the 3100+ at 1.65V. (Toasty 57 degrees on stock cooler!)

I actually like the ECS mobo better despite it's HTT shortcomings. In addition to the 15$ price difference, it has the almighty additional RAM slot, and more pci-ex/pci expansion slots. The ECS coupled with a 9x/10x chip would be all most need, as Furballi already stated.

Anyway....Great Thread!