- Jan 29, 2005
- 84
- 0
- 0
I've seen several people advise getting the AlCu version of this cooler, since it "weighs less and works almost as well as the copper version."
The Cu cooler weighs 918g and the AlCu cooler weighs 600g. Won't the additional 50% of thermal mass be a substantial advantage? The price difference between the two coolers is only $5-$6.
I have seen the benchmarks that have the AlCu cooler keeping the processor at 40C and the Cu only mananging 1 degree cooler or so. But this is for today's processors.
When I upgrade to a dual-core Athlon 64 FX-63 or whatever in the future that is pushing out 100+ watts, maybe the Cu cooler will keep it at 50C when the AlCu cooler will keep it at 55-60C (ie the performance delta will grow)?
Or am I mistaken?
The Cu cooler weighs 918g and the AlCu cooler weighs 600g. Won't the additional 50% of thermal mass be a substantial advantage? The price difference between the two coolers is only $5-$6.
I have seen the benchmarks that have the AlCu cooler keeping the processor at 40C and the Cu only mananging 1 degree cooler or so. But this is for today's processors.
When I upgrade to a dual-core Athlon 64 FX-63 or whatever in the future that is pushing out 100+ watts, maybe the Cu cooler will keep it at 50C when the AlCu cooler will keep it at 55-60C (ie the performance delta will grow)?
Or am I mistaken?