MtnMan
Diamond Member
- Jul 27, 2004
- 8,927
- 8,132
- 136
If it was like .50 cents a movie I could see it... 4 dollars... not so much.
No, not even at 50 cents, as I will simply turn a movie off when I find "it ain't my cup of tea".
If it was like .50 cents a movie I could see it... 4 dollars... not so much.
No, not even at 50 cents, as I will simply turn a movie off when I find "it ain't my cup of tea".
What does your cup of tea have to do with the price of movie rentals on the internet?
You're paying a $3 premium for being able to watch movies before redbox (total assumption on my part) and not having to return a disk. Not worth it imo. Now that directv offers youtube videos I wonder if they will eventually allow you to watch these. Kinda doubt it since it would be direct competition for their own on demand.
Heh... I guess that their "They service is only available in the US, buzz off you crazy Brit!" page isn't ready yet.
It doesn't help them that they are competing with Amazon OnDemand as well. They are also lacking a WMC plug-in :/.
It works now you crazy yank.
Again Google with another dud. They just really seem to have missed the mark with their music/movie service. Nobody wants to pay $4 to rent a movie to watch on Youtube. Nobody.
It really seems like Google is trying hard to grow from their bread/butter services that made them what they are (search, maps, advertising, etc.), but they lack the direction and polish to execute successfully. Even Android, IMHO, is largely successful because they filled a void nobody else did.
