Youtube movie short producer nets $30m + hollywood film deal with Sam Raimi's studio

SunnyD

Belgian Waffler
Jan 2, 2001
32,674
146
106
www.neftastic.com
Holy shit.

The video clip he produced.

An unknown producer from Uruguay, Fede Alvarez, shelled out about $300 to create a cool video of a robot invasion in Montevideo, the capitol of Uruguay. The four-minute short, "Ataque de Panico!" (Panic Attack) features ginormous (but slow-moving) weapon-wielding robots that blow stuff up.
Well, apparently nothing gets by Hollywood these days. The lucky duck told the BBC, "I uploaded 'Ataque de Panico!' on a Thursday and on Monday my inbox was totally full of emails from Hollywood studios." Long story short, a bidding war ensued. The offer he pocketed: A $30 million deal with Sam "Spiderman" Raimi's Ghost House Pictures. That's a nice return on investment.
Whatever he comes up with is gonna be one hell of a movie.
 
Last edited:

TechBoyJK

Lifer
Oct 17, 2002
16,699
60
91
yea that video is tight. $300? maybe in capital outlay.. there's some serious production value there. he knows wtf he is doing for sure. $300 + labor.. apparently, thats about $30,000,300.

-Jason
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,520
6,353
126
wow, i must say, that is pretty damn awesome considering it was a one man project and $300.
 

Hacp

Lifer
Jun 8, 2005
13,923
2
81
Can you even buy a computer that can rendor those images for 300 dollars?
 

actuarial

Platinum Member
Jan 22, 2009
2,814
0
71
If he only spent $300, then he didn't pay anything to the dozens of actors in that film.

Regardless of outlay, a guy making that without the support of a huge studio is pretty incredible.
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
Not surprising at all. I know many studios that will finance a project if they like what they see, whether that is in a script or a short video. I get asked a lot how to get work at studios, what degree you need. None of that matters, they want to see what you can do, it is a visual medium, they don't care if you have 10 masters degrees if you can't do the work. The problem is just getting your stuff out there to be seen.

The bad part is once he goes to spend that $30 million it is going to go quick. Money in film spends faster than you can write the checks.
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
30,719
2,610
126
I too am impressed with this mans talents. It is a shame that the same sequence would have cost $300,000 to make if done by a studio. Talent is expensive, but if he can cheaply make a blockbuster, he will have a bright future in Hollywood.
 
Last edited:

rockyct

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2001
6,656
32
91
That's some fuzzy math if he's calculating it to cost $300. Heck, you may as well say it cost only $50 for the gas to drive the actors/crew around. The only props were the toy robots, the mini camcorder, the tv camera, the anchorman's mic, and the stroller. If he's got access to that kind of software, I'd imagine he'd have those props.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
69,993
13,484
126
www.anyf.ca
I can believe the $300, depending on how he did it. It's probably computer generated. He did not actually build robots and ask permission to destroy a city. :p I've always wondered how they make people in movies like that though, they look way too real to be computer generated. Do they have the background computer generated then real people in front of a blue screen?
 

sygyzy

Lifer
Oct 21, 2000
14,001
4
76
I can believe the $300, depending on how he did it. It's probably computer generated. He did not actually build robots and ask permission to destroy a city. :p I've always wondered how they make people in movies like that though, they look way too real to be computer generated. Do they have the background computer generated then real people in front of a blue screen?

Oh really? That's your logic? Thanks for sharing it with all of us. All along we thought that he built giant robots and the materials alone would exceed $300.

I didn't realize he did it with computers. Wow, I guess years of 3d modeling training, a renderfarm, shading, textures, models, etc don't cost as much as I thought.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
69,993
13,484
126
www.anyf.ca
Oh really? That's your logic? Thanks for sharing it with all of us. All along we thought that he built giant robots and the materials alone would exceed $300.

I didn't realize he did it with computers. Wow, I guess years of 3d modeling training, a renderfarm, shading, textures, models, etc don't cost as much as I thought.

I'm just guessing. I've never made a movie, but I just can't imagine having to actually build robots to do something like that.
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
Do they have the background computer generated then real people in front of a blue screen?


It is pre filmed then the animation is added over it. Green screen is on its way out as a method of mixing live and CG. Computers have gotten powerful enough that it is becoming possible to set up boundaries on a pre-filmed video and have the 3d actor scale and adapt to it. One of the most used products is called Matchmover. It is part of of Autodesk Maya.

It allows you to do things like film yourself throwing a football outside to a friend as you move the camera around the scene then bring that into Maya and change the football into a missle and have it scale and adapt to the scene. You could add a monster coming up behind your friend and have the camera match it completely . All without a green screen.

Matchmover page with video
http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/pc/index?siteID=123112&id=13583239#channels_What's New