Mo: To ask a question is not to imply.
------------
Mu: Not true. For example, if I asked, 'Moonie, when did you leave the Nazi Party?', that implies you joined it in the first place.
Mo: He didn't ask that kind of question. He didn't ask, if you no longer support Brown.
Mu: One can't quit a group if one hasn't joined it first. N yusef implied I opposed Brown with no evidence to that effect. If he didn't want to be a troll, all he had to do was ask "What are your thoughts on Brown?" See, it's not hard to ask a simple question without being a wanker about it.
Mo: Unbelievable. He said, "So you don't support Brown v. Board of Education?" What you said he should do is exactly what he did. Do you or do you not support Brown?
And he did so, I think, for obvious reasons. You do support Brown and that throws into doubt your theory that the best way to change is by ammendment.
------------
Mo: So maybe you could address just the question and leave off with the feelings of being attacked.
Mu: I don't see Brown as 'creating new rights' but merely enforcing existing ones as found within the 14th and 15th Amendments. If blacks were barred from the 'white' school for no reason other than they were black, that's clearly unconstitutional. It's hardly a stretch.
Mo: Right, and the courts could have ruled that not being able to vote for no other reason than being a woman is clearly not constitutional.
------------
Mu: Not true. For example, if I asked, 'Moonie, when did you leave the Nazi Party?', that implies you joined it in the first place.
Mo: He didn't ask that kind of question. He didn't ask, if you no longer support Brown.
Mu: One can't quit a group if one hasn't joined it first. N yusef implied I opposed Brown with no evidence to that effect. If he didn't want to be a troll, all he had to do was ask "What are your thoughts on Brown?" See, it's not hard to ask a simple question without being a wanker about it.
Mo: Unbelievable. He said, "So you don't support Brown v. Board of Education?" What you said he should do is exactly what he did. Do you or do you not support Brown?
And he did so, I think, for obvious reasons. You do support Brown and that throws into doubt your theory that the best way to change is by ammendment.
------------
Mo: So maybe you could address just the question and leave off with the feelings of being attacked.
Mu: I don't see Brown as 'creating new rights' but merely enforcing existing ones as found within the 14th and 15th Amendments. If blacks were barred from the 'white' school for no reason other than they were black, that's clearly unconstitutional. It's hardly a stretch.
Mo: Right, and the courts could have ruled that not being able to vote for no other reason than being a woman is clearly not constitutional.
Facebook
Twitter