moonbogg
Lifer
- Jan 8, 2011
- 10,736
- 3,454
- 136
Base was 1102 and boost was 1190.
You got loads of head room left. 1400mhz is a cake walk for the 980ti.
Base was 1102 and boost was 1190.
I agree with this.
OP noticed that you verified a single 980ti a big improvement from a single 290 but If you want to replace 290's then you have to get GTX 980ti's to really see a change.
On the plus side you will be able to install new games and not worry about CF or SLI profiles
That correct bystander36
I'm at work so you'll have to hold on champ- DEEP BREATHS!Guskline, you are killing me. I'm dying here, on my last breath. The only thing that can save me is your overclocking results. Please, hurry.
No pressure though. Maybe you don't want the card and you want to send it back, so not overclocking would be a good idea in that case. NO PRESSURE!!!
moonbogg: went home for lunch, was able to remove the EK waterblock on one of the R9 290s, reattach the Sapphire Tri-X cooler and pop it into my 3770k rig along with the other Tri-X. Running CF 290S in the 3770k and a watercooled GTX980TI SC in the rig below.
When I installed my blocks, I was like "OMG this is going to become a $700 paper weight!".
I was feeling the same way, except it was around an $800 paper weight. Reference 980 Ti + EK water block + back plate. I was very much crossing my fingers when I finally got it powered up. I had to wait an extra few days as my chosen reservoir was not working out at all and I couldn't fill the system until I figured that out.
I've learned as I've worked on my custom loop, to take the time to make sure all fittings are connected properly and purge as much air as possible from the system. It helps with 3 480mm rads that I have 2 D5 pumps in series. Also I have an extra PSU that I use for powering the dual pumps and running them for a few hours to purge all the air.
