Your Take On Phonebloks concept?

cbrunny

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 2007
6,791
406
126
Agree that it looks very cool and is a very cool concept.

But...very cautiously optimistic, with more than a hint of "this will never happen the way they claim"
 

openwheel

Platinum Member
Apr 30, 2012
2,044
17
81
I would love it and be an early adopter, but I highly doubt it would materialize.
 

zaydq

Senior member
Jul 8, 2012
782
0
0
Nifty... but i doubt carriers, or oems, will ever allow this concept to materialize.
 

OS

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
15,581
1
76
These guys have obviously never heard of the "FCC" and I'm not sure any actual EEs even worked on the concept.
 

Crono

Lifer
Aug 8, 2001
23,720
1,502
136
I like the concept and want to see something like this come to fruition. Building your own phone currently isn't an easy task for anyone to do individually, so a "LEGO" approach to phone customization sounds perfect for computer enthusiasts like many of us are.
 

hans007

Lifer
Feb 1, 2000
20,212
18
81
given companies are removing things like battery doors, etc, just to keep phone sizes down....

this is probably technically unfeasable. either that or you'd have a gigantic phone. just to build whatever it takes to house each individual block would waste volume, not to mention this magical "base backplane" would have to be designed to actually route things in some magic way.
 

Stuka87

Diamond Member
Dec 10, 2010
6,240
2,559
136
I just don't see how they could work in the video as they present it. The device would be far more bulky than I think anybody would care for. Soon as you add pins and sockets, the thickness is going to double from what phones are today.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
32,686
10,855
136
How's that going to work?

You can't just randomly connect a bunch of smartphone parts and get a working smartphone.
 

kasakka

Senior member
Mar 16, 2013
334
1
81
Completely unfeasible. The current trend is to cram more stuff on a System on Chip design, meaning that there are no separate parts to update. The number one thing that actually takes space on a phone is the battery. You wouldn't be able to accommodate a much larger one by taking out components.
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,739
454
126
given companies are removing things like battery doors, etc, just to keep phone sizes down....

this is probably technically unfeasable. either that or you'd have a gigantic phone. just to build whatever it takes to house each individual block would waste volume, not to mention this magical "base backplane" would have to be designed to actually route things in some magic way.


I just don't see how they could work in the video as they present it. The device would be far more bulky than I think anybody would care for. Soon as you add pins and sockets, the thickness is going to double from what phones are today.

Agreed with these. Everything will be bulkier because of the connectors and plastic case around each component. Stupid idea
 

Imaginer

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 1999
8,076
1
0
These guys have obviously never heard of the "FCC" and I'm not sure any actual EEs even worked on the concept.

I just don't see how they could work in the video as they present it. The device would be far more bulky than I think anybody would care for. Soon as you add pins and sockets, the thickness is going to double from what phones are today.

This. Even if the pins and backplane are only for power regulation, the numerous localized wireless communications will be of an interference nightmare along with wireless regulations.

I am confident some forum readers know the data bus nightmare that will ensue if one were to whimsically place these blocks where ever location as the video depicted.

And if I have problems with more than a handful of 2.4GHz devices in a household at times and in the same room, what makes an even purely wireless data interconnect even better?
 

Imaginer

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 1999
8,076
1
0
A better solution is to actually improve material reclamation processes with retired devices.