Originally posted by: Stunt
It's a low margin business and reducing labour content is critical to maintain outrageous corporate salaries.
fixed
Hey, I was the one who was surprised by the amount my executives make.Originally posted by: bctbct
fixedOriginally posted by: Stunt
It's a low margin business and reducing labour content is critical to maintain outrageous corporate salaries.
Originally posted by: Stunt
Hey, I was the one who was surprised by the amount my executives make.Originally posted by: bctbct
fixedOriginally posted by: Stunt
It's a low margin business and reducing labour content is critical to maintain outrageous corporate salaries.
It is a low margin business, even if the CEO and CFO cut their pay; it wouldn't save many employees for very long.
Originally posted by: bctbct
Originally posted by: Stunt
It's a low margin business and reducing labour content is critical to maintain outrageous corporate salaries.
fixed
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: bctbct
Originally posted by: Stunt
It's a low margin business and reducing labour content is critical to maintain outrageous corporate salaries.
fixed
Maybe they should make one of those union workers the CEO and see how fast he runs the company into the ground.
I give it 37 seconds. And that's including a bathroom break.
If a CEO can increase profits in a company by $50 million a year, paying him $5 million a year is a bargain. Employing unneed workers is bad business. It is a business after all, not a charity. Of course every business wants to grow, so laying off workers is never an easy decision.

 
				
		