Your entire party is a dumpster fire

Page 22 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Younigue

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2017
5,888
1,447
106
Yes, even when he could easily just tell the truth, he Trump's it up because it's gotta be bigly.
I think he means am I sure that he's ok with Trump lying. *shrug* My answer is, sure he is. Any support of this president or his cronies is to choose to be complicit to their corruption. They are no longer Republican Representatives, they are traitors. Get them out then go back to supporting whatever political views suit you. Dude thinks he can ignore their corruption if some of their policies appeal to him. The only thing that CAN mean is that he is ok with the lies, childishness, perversion of the political system, ugliness and corruption. He thinks there's some sort of balance to be found with a corrupt Administration in place.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
I think he means am I sure that he's ok with Trump lying. *shrug* My answer is, sure he is. Any support of this president or his cronies is to choose to be complicit to their corruption. They are no longer Republican Representatives, they are traitors. Get them out then go back to supporting whatever political views suit you. Dude thinks he can ignore their corruption if some of their policies appeal to him. The only thing that CAN mean is that he is ok with the lies, childishness, perversion of the political system, ugliness and corruption. He thinks there's some sort of balance to be found with a corrupt Administration in place.

Ive already said Im not. So whats your point?
 

jackstar7

Lifer
Jun 26, 2009
11,679
1,944
126
Agree. I personally think the likelihood of proof of collusion is slim to none, but I admit there may be other things. As I have said several times I look forward to the findings.
When you say collusion, what are you talking about?

The word is being used loosely in the broader context of the investigation of the relationship between Trump and Russia.

So when you say he won't find proof, what would that have to be, and what would it be proving?