Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: pinion9
Originally posted by: BigJ
But since you want literal, I guess I'll come up with a literal way. If you're en-route to the store, you're "going to" the store. If you always take a similar way to the store, software can recognize your route and predict where you're going, which really isn't all that complicated to do. It's as simple as comparing routes through a tree.
Hmm..In my city there are several routes to get to one place. Also, there are routes that take you to several places. Comparing routes through a tree? For a million drivers? It isn't as simple as writing a sub-routine.
x = CompareRoutesThroughTree(John Doe)
if (x = SecretariesHouse) {
AlertWife()
}
All done! No, it would be an NP-Hard problem and guess what! Computationally infeasible for millions of people!
My
point still stands that it would take trillions of dollars in hardware in order to store the information.
Where did I say millions of people? I cited the example of people wanting to track me. On top of that, if someone wanted to argue doing this on a widespread scale, since we are talking in the future, these calculations become increasingly easier to do on a large scale with advancements.
And again, while the technology may not be there *today*, with the huge advancements in storage we're realizing, it would be downright silly to say that this couldn't be realized within many peoples' lifetimes, and possibly much sooner before that.
On top of that, it's pretty easy to see people using technology for monetary gain right now. Look at the EZ-Pass system. It's as simple as calculating the distance between tolls and finding the average speed. If the average speed was above the speed limit, I don't see what would stop Ez-Pass in conjunction with Law Enforcement from issuing tickets (although interstate could get complicated) in the future. I'm sure, if it hasn't already, will eventually wind up being an issue in the courts.