Am I the only one who thinks its weird that he's 55 and messaging a 21 year old?
Am I the only one who thinks its weird that he's 55 and messaging a 21 year old?
Nope. Republicans have been screwing young people for a long time.
If Sarah is wealthy then Obama is, too.You have to understand the nutty position that has become big with the "liberal" crowd these days, intersectionality and the Oppression Olympics.
Think of it as a rating of all your traits based on a simple chart. Just add them up and see what your score is. If you have a high number, you have nothing to complain about and are not allowed to criticize anyone. Making fun of you is fair game because that's "punching up". You are not allowed to comment about anyone with a lower score than you, because that's "punching down" and you need to check your privilege, shitlord.
Transexual -10
Black -9
Democrat -7
Homosexual -5
Female -5
Muslim -5
Hispanic -4
Atheist -2
Asian 0
Heterosexual +4
Christian +5
Male +5
White +8
Republican +9
Wealthy +10
Sarah Palin, being a wealthy (10), white (8), Christian (5), Republican (9) woman (-5) scores a 27. She's fair game for almost anybody.
Obama of course cannot be made fun of by anyone. Not even comedians.
It will be interesting to see where Bruce Jenner ends up. She has all the sympathy from the left as an oppressed transexual. But there could still be enough room to make fun of her and get away with it due to being a a wealthy, white Republican.
If Sarah is wealthy then Obama is, too.
Wealthy (10) Male (5) Christian (5) Heterosexual (4) Black (-9) Democrat (-7) scores an 8. Not so far down on the scale.
If Sarah is wealthy then Obama is, too.
Wealthy (10) Male (5) Christian (5) Heterosexual (4) Black (-9) Democrat (-7) scores an 8. Not so far down on the scale.
Wait please explain? I respect that someone may choose to not watch however this is worded so it only applies to Liberals is it ok for conservatives to look at pornography?
I visit a gun site from time to time and have learned to do my absolute, very best job of avoiding any political discussions because I find the people there to be insane in fairly significant numbers. Not all of them, but certainly more than in P&N.
You were sticking a needle in their bubble. They don't like it when the bubble they're floating around in is threatened with a rude poke of a needle called reality.
It would have been just as bad as if you had mentioned that all of their day dreaming about being the badass gun-sling'in root'in-toot'in straight-as-an-arrow-shoot'in hombre with a secret hanker'in for a mud-pack'in session with Steven Seagal was just not going to happen......ever.
why does it seem those that are the most against being gay always turn out to be gay?
ugh.
Probably the same reason as it was in the past. They feel guilty for being gay
why does it seem those that are the most against being gay always turn out to be gay?
ugh.
why does it seem those that are the most against being gay always turn out to be gay?
ugh.
You missed the part about "Whompingly huge zit on the chin."
one of the few times where i'd say moonbeam's rambling about self-hate might be pretty damned accurate.
one of the few times where i'd say moonbeam's rambling about self-hate might be pretty damned accurate.
You were sticking a needle in their bubble. They don't like it when the bubble they're floating around in is threatened with a rude poke of a needle called reality.
It would have been just as bad as if you had mentioned that all of their day dreaming about being the badass gun-sling'in root'in-toot'in straight-as-an-arrow-shoot'in hombre with a secret hanker'in for a mud-pack'in session with Steven Seagal was just not going to happen......ever.
shaddap,o ye in pinellas
lol. Voting power to a guy named Boning is like handing your retirement money to a guy named Made-Off.Boehning? Roughrider Legislature? Sounds like something from The Onion.
Agreed, but if he was voting against gay protections as cover, that's karma. If he was voting against them because of principled belief, fine. But if he's going to be trusted with power, he should be bright enough to figure out that this behavior WILL be made public, whether or not it should be. There are simply too many gay men hating the GOP to ever believe otherwise. Either way, it doesn't look good for him. If someone hacked him, fine, but just as with Wiener there should be no reasonable expectation that one can send pictures of one's junk to strangers and expect privacy.Outside of hypocrisy, what really bothers me about this story is that this man was outed by invading his privacy.