"You get what you pay for."

[brigden]

 

[icejunkie]

I agree.. there are some occasions which it doesnt completely apply

 

[Blazin Trav]

Strongly agree.

Pay $5K for a POS car, you will get a POS car.

 

[imported_Mike]

Strongly Agree, but not 100% agree.

 

[Kadarin]

Unless you either get a really good deal, or ripped off.

 

[venk]

REPOX!

 

[shilala]

I went with "agree" because you don't always get what you pay for even if you pay dearly.

 

[z0mb13]

depends..

example: dell lcds are cheaper than competitors, yet better..

 

[cjgallen]

Not always.

 

[alien42]

so everyone here 'strongly agrees' that expensive designer products are worth it?

 

[Wallydraigle]

I would agree that this is an adage made up by those desperate to cling to the idea that there is some type of balance or justice in the universe. Those who know better realise that if there's a god he hates you and flings feces at you every chance he gets.

 

[Kishan]

Agree, but know how much to pay.

 

[imported_Mike]

Originally posted by: alien42
so everyone here 'strongly agrees' that expensive designer products are worth it?

see my post, why would you put "strongly agree" in front of everything you can think of instead of taking it as an opinion of the majority.

 

[n7]

I generally agree.

 

[stonecold3169]

Works more accurate the cheaper stuff is. Basically applies only to the low end, up to the mid end, and then gets superflous

 

[brigden]

Originally posted by: alien42
so everyone here 'strongly agrees' that expensive designer products are worth it?

Nice try.

I was genuinely curious as to how people perceive the value of consumer goods in general.

 

[brigden]

Originally posted by: stonecold3169
Works more accurate the cheaper stuff is. Basically applies only to the low end, up to the mid end, and then gets superflous

I agree. I'll use a popular example: $100 jeans will be superior to $30 jeans, but $600 jeans are no more superior than the $100 item.