• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

yet another stupid lawsuit

The state should countersue for the crime of being heartless moneygrubbing assholes.
 


probably some stupid jury will let her win too, Just to make the evil giant "Wal_Mart" pay.

If this case is won by the mom then that should be proof that we need Professional Juries.
 
Originally posted by: NetGuySC


probably some stupid jury will let her win too, Just to make the evil giant "Wal_Mart" pay.

If this case is won by the mom then that should be proof that we need Professional Juries.

YES.
 
Meant with no disrespect, even if she lived in a country of no guns, im relatively sure someone who's not taken their meds and are manically depressed would have found another way to kill themselves. This just shows weakness in the system's handling of depressed people, or in this case, the lack of handling.
 
Originally posted by: PhasmatisNox
Take responsibility for raising your own children.

That is all.

Easier said than done. Ever lived with a depressed person before? As your reply certain shows so. Depression and other mental illnessses most of the time, have nothing to do with "up bringing".
 
So stupid. I HOPE she doesn't win, definitely should have been keeping a closer eye on the girl. What if someone went out and bought a knife at any store, and then killed themselves with it. OMGWTFBBQ!!! Lets sue the store that sold the knife. Same thing, she should be counter-sued for being generally stupid.
 
Originally posted by: Erich Pratt, a spokesman for the Virginia-based group Gun Owners of America
"Does that mean mental illness prevents everyone on Prozac from owning a gun? Or women with PMS?"
Ouch. No good will come of this at all. Instead of being brats they should follow the example of the Congresswoman who ran, got elected and drafted a bill after her husband was shot.

 
Oh, I get it. So all Wal-marts are supposed to keep track of everyone who buys/tries to buy a gun and share it between all of their stores, AND ask what people want them for.
 
Originally posted by: txxxx
Originally posted by: PhasmatisNox
Take responsibility for raising your own children.

That is all.

Easier said than done. Ever lived with a depressed person before? As your reply certain shows so. Depression and other mental illnessses most of the time, have nothing to do with "up bringing".

I have in fact lived with depressed people. But it isn't society's business, it seems more personal to me. Sueing Wal-Mart because they, by law, couldn't have the information and she lied on the forms. That seems somewhat not Wallyworld's problem to me.
 
Originally posted by: txxxx
Originally posted by: PhasmatisNox
Take responsibility for raising your own children.

That is all.

Easier said than done. Ever lived with a depressed person before? As your reply certain shows so. Depression and other mental illnessses most of the time, have nothing to do with "up bringing".

The mother should have been with her daughter 24/7 to make sure she didn't do anything dangerous. I mean, she was obviously aware of how unstable her child was.

If the woman expects Wal-mart to violate privacy laws and illegally dig deeply into the lives of anyone that wishes to purchase a shotgun, then the same level of effort should be expected on the part of the loved ones of the mentally ill.
 
Originally posted by: Toastedlightly
Originally posted by: txxxx
Originally posted by: PhasmatisNox
Take responsibility for raising your own children.

That is all.

Easier said than done. Ever lived with a depressed person before? As your reply certain shows so. Depression and other mental illnessses most of the time, have nothing to do with "up bringing".

I have in fact lived with depressed people. But it isn't society's business, it seems more personal to me. Sueing Wal-Mart because they, by law, couldn't have the information and she lied on the forms. That seems somewhat not Wallyworld's problem to me.

I agree, this isnt Wallmart's problem at all. This would set a bad precedent if she wins.

I jumped onto that post as i'm sick of the "take care of your children and they'll turn out ok" attitude.

If you seriously think that "Take responsibility for raising your own children" will prevent this, maybe you need your own head checking.
 
Originally posted by: Kilrsat
Originally posted by: txxxx
Originally posted by: PhasmatisNox
Take responsibility for raising your own children.

That is all.

Easier said than done. Ever lived with a depressed person before? As your reply certain shows so. Depression and other mental illnessses most of the time, have nothing to do with "up bringing".

The mother should have been with her daughter 24/7 to make sure she didn't do anything dangerous. I mean, she was obviously aware of how unstable her child was.

If the woman expects Wal-mart to violate privacy laws and illegally dig deeply into the lives of anyone that wishes to purchase a shotgun, then the same level of effort should be expected on the part of the loved ones of the mentally ill.

Read above.
 
Well, #1:

Does anybody here REALLY think Wal-Mart should be selling guns in the first place?

I mean, seriously, that's just bizarre.

IMHO, guns would more appropriately be sold at, oh, I dunno, GUN SHOPS where the owner/operator will know more about what they are selling, bother to ask questions, etc.

It just seems to be a "reality disconnect" to have the impersonal mindless Wal-Mart Sales Drones selling something *designed* to kill large people-sized things.

(And before the gun advocates jump all over me - I'm hardly saying guns shouldn't be sold, just NOT AT WALMART.)

Originally posted by: NetGuySC
probably some stupid jury will let her win too, Just to make the evil giant "Wal_Mart" pay.

If this case is won by the mom then that should be proof that we need Professional Juries.

We have one, it's called the Supreme Court.
 
If you're going to kill yourself, Wal Mart not selling you a gun isn't going to stop you. Look around you RIGHT NOW. Look carefully. Count the number of things you could kill yourself with.

See that CD-R? Grind it up into a powder and inhale it.
See the screwdriver? Insert into nose, PUSH!

Should Walmart do comprehensive background checks on the purchasers of CDR's? Screwdrivers? Computers themselves? Hell, you can kill yourself with enough AA batteries. The line must be drawn somewhere, and in the case of guns, the line has already been drawn. Don't sue Walmart for not breaking the law, sue Texas for MAKING the law.
I could go on for days.
 
Originally posted by: dderidex
Well, #1:

Does anybody here REALLY think Wal-Mart should be selling guns in the first place?

I mean, seriously, that's just bizarre.

IMHO, guns would more appropriately be sold at, oh, I dunno, GUN SHOPS where the owner/operator will know more about what they are selling, bother to ask questions, etc.

It just seems to be a "reality disconnect" to have the impersonal mindless Wal-Mart Sales Drones selling something *designed* to kill large people-sized things.

(And before the gun advocates jump all over me - I'm hardly saying guns shouldn't be sold, just NOT AT WALMART.)

Originally posted by: NetGuySC
probably some stupid jury will let her win too, Just to make the evil giant "Wal_Mart" pay.

If this case is won by the mom then that should be proof that we need Professional Juries.

We have one, it's called the Supreme Court.

this is a shotgun, shotguns are different from handguns..

let me guess, you are pro gun control right? but this has nothing to do with that.. walmart has always been selling shotguns, so your point of why they are selling is moot

the supreme court chooses which case they will review.. and it is basically an appelate court (for appeals)


 
Stupid on the part of the local government. What the hell is the point of the Brady Bill if you CAN'T CHECK MENTAL HEALTH RECORDS! 😕
 
Originally posted by: txxxx
Originally posted by: Toastedlightly
Originally posted by: txxxx
Originally posted by: PhasmatisNox
Take responsibility for raising your own children.

That is all.

Easier said than done. Ever lived with a depressed person before? As your reply certain shows so. Depression and other mental illnessses most of the time, have nothing to do with "up bringing".

I have in fact lived with depressed people. But it isn't society's business, it seems more personal to me. Sueing Wal-Mart because they, by law, couldn't have the information and she lied on the forms. That seems somewhat not Wallyworld's problem to me.

I agree, this isnt Wallmart's problem at all. This would set a bad precedent if she wins.

I jumped onto that post as i'm sick of the "take care of your children and they'll turn out ok" attitude.

If you seriously think that "Take responsibility for raising your own children" will prevent this, maybe you need your own head checking.
If raising your child properly won't prevent this, what will? Locking her up?
 
Back
Top