I don't understand why they even did this review. It doesn't make much sense to show the difference between FIVE nVidia GeForce cards and just one lone ATI Radeon card. The ATI Radeon card sucked in almost every gaming benchmark, but, did you notice that just about every test was done at 1024 x 768? Not exactly "real world" if you ask me. I admit I run everything at 1024 x 768, but what about other screen resolutions? Is this the norm?
I think the dweebs (notice the stupid pictures?) over there have nothing better to do than slap up meaningless, idiotic "Shootout" reviews because they really have nothing better to do with their time. Most people that visit these hardware websites already know about the little speed gains offered from the various nVidia GeForce "Pro" and "Ultra" video cards -- just read the individual reviews. Hell, the individual reviews themselves contain enough information to make a purchasing decision, so, what's the point of a "video card shootout"? Are they bored? Showing the differences on the cards themself is ok (i.e. video out, etc.), but the benchmarks are a complete joke. Let's be a little more realistic, folks.
I agree with RoboTECH on the bias thing. For a review to have any real merit, it needs to be non-biased. Unfortunately, Sharkey's isn't. I also don't like the idea of having to wade through page after page of mundane script, just to find the information I want -- another joke.
Just my $.02