• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

YESSSS RAMBUS THE RAPEBUS LOST in JURY trial - $3.95 BILLION GONE!

Due to the outcome of this trial their company worth dropped 78 percent.

sweet sweet fairness 🙂

I love the part where RamBus failed due to the competition making their ram cheaper than what RamBus was sold for.
 
i thought rambus was actually in the right? i remember reading a discussion showing that it was the other companies that actually screwed them over
 
i thought rambus was actually in the right? i remember reading a discussion showing that it was the other companies that actually screwed them over
Neither group is clearly in the right, which is why it's taking the courts over a decade to sort this out. Rambus was clearly underhanded in their dealings with the JEDEC, but not enough so that they broke any laws; as far as the courts are concerned Rambus legitimately had their technology made part of the specs for SDRAM and beyond. So SDRAM manufacturers did infringe on Rambus's patents, even though they were induced by the JEDEC process.

On the other hand the SDRAM manufacturers did engage in general price fixing in the time period in question. They artificially kept SDRAM (and DDR) prices high early in the decade, and the DoJ has already hit them with a stick for that. The remaining question was whether the SDRAM manufacturers were also scheming against Rambus during this time, which is what the trial was about. The outcome of losing the trial is that as far as the law is concerned the SDRAM manufacturers (Hynix and Micron to be specific) were not colluding against Rambus, and that their price fixing for SDRAM was a separate endeavour.
 
I remember reading and all the talk (negitive) regarding RDRAM when it came out. In all points I cared about at the time, it was not worth having, Then I used a PC that had it (P4 1.6 IIRC) and compared to the normal P4's of the same speed, it made the computer fly in terms of responciveness. But all things considered (price, early P4's/motherboards being designed for RDRAM so speed hit going to SD ect) just did not help.

As far as I remember, SD ram dropped in price of the following years, RDRAM stayed basically the same price. When it came to size, RDRAM was still at the same size while SD chips started getting larger (about th 128MB IIRC).

Price killed it off personally, any respect for it (performance wise) died when they started sueing people as a means of making their business profitable (espically after I read into it and got the basics of their underhanded tactics).
 
Wuts RAMBUS? Lulz.

These sorts of get rich quick "companies" need to DIAF. It's like, I'll start a company, patent some universally common sense idea like "the wheel" with a vague patent that says "round thing", not make any legitimate contribution or product, then start suing everybody. Nope.
 
Last edited:
Wuts RAMBUS? Lulz.

These sorts of get rich quick "companies" need to DIAF. It's like, I'll start a company, patent some universally common sense idea like "the wheel" with a vague patent that says "round thing", not make any legitimate contribution or product, then start suing everybody. Nope.

Rambus actually had, and still has, great ideas on how to make fast memory products. Innovation and value-add wasn't their issue.

Their issue was their business tactics, their corporate ethics, and their arrogance.

Had they not been so shady, essentially tricking the JEDEC into incorporating their proprietary IP into the DDR standards, and had they not been so arrogant, approaching the memory makers as if they were Intel Jr. just because Intel said Rambus was their favored memory standard going forward, then the memory makers themselves probably would not have solidified their resolve to make DDR and DDR2 work "no matter what the cost" to undercut and undermine Rambus ram.

More expensive products happen, and if they add value then their expense is accepted and absorbed (see SSD's). But the reality was that NO ONE wanted to see Rambus become the defacto standard because they were such bullies of the industry despite being so small.

The corporate ego and arrogance were their own undoing. No different than how people tend to limit their own personal career paths, so too did Rambus as a business.

No one wants to do business with a dick unless they have no choice. Rambus was the corporate equivalent of a dick.
 
Rambus actually had, and still has, great ideas on how to make fast memory products. Innovation and value-add wasn't their issue.

Their issue was their business tactics, their corporate ethics, and their arrogance.

Exactly. I'm absolutely thrilled at this decision because of Rambus' shady, awful business tactics.

Yes, their memory was a clever re-think of traditional RAM (higher clockspeed with a much lower pin count, meaning fewer traces on the motherboard and thus reduced motherboard cost & complexity - critical to many designs of motherboards in cramped spaces). This led to RDRAM being adopted on several video game consoles -- even the PS3 uses a form of RAMBUS memory!

However their switch to being primarily a litigation company disgusted me. They haven't innovated much of anything in the past decade.
 
Well then that does it, I'm taking back my 1gb of Rdram from my P4T533C then, before it devalues anymore!!!!
 
https://www.google.com/finance?client=ob&q=NASDAQ:RMBS

fb141.jpg
 
Back
Top