Buahahaha! How is that relevant to the question regarding Bush or Hitler? For a start, the question regarding any of them is hypothetical. Then, they're independent cases, and any hypothetical answer regarding one would not necessarily apply to either of the others.Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Has anyone ever heard a conservative say this about Clinton? (The world would have been better if he had never been born?)
Once you get around to evaluating Hitler, Bush and Clinton independently, you'd have to work overtime, probably beyond your lifespan, to make a case that anything Clinton did during his term of office was as destructive to this nation as starting the war in Iraq based on entirely on lies or to find as much total incompetence as was evidenced by the Bush administration's handling of the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
The incompetence could be written off to arrogance, ineptitude and stupidity. The costs in lives, money and the credibility and reputation of our nation for going into Iraq can only be ascribed to pure evil. :| :| :|
Tell that to the families and friends of the nearly 3,000 American troops who died and the tens of thousands of wounded in Iraq. Then, tell it to the hundreds of thousands of dead and wounded civilian Iraqis. Some of them may have a bone to pick with your keen analysis.Maybe this shows that conservatives value life more than liberals?