Yellowstone Volcano Eruption: Report Claims That US Has Contingency Deals Worldwide!

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
yellowstone-volcano-sa.jpg


Yellowstone Volcano Eruption: Report Claims That US Has Contingency Deal With Brazil, Australia

If the Yellowstone supervolcano erupts then millions of U.S. citizens could end up in Brazil, Australia, or Argentina.

That’s according to the South African news website Praag, which said that the African National Congress was offered $10 billion a year for 10 years if it would build temporary housing for Americans in case of an eruption.

The potential eruption of the supervolcano, one of the biggest in the world, has been a hot topic ever since videos of animals allegedly fleeing the area before an earthquake were posted online. Although the veracity of the claims haven’t been backed up, dozens of bloggers and others have been trying to figure out what, if anything, is going on.

One of the latest theories is that the U.S. Geological Service and its partners, which keep an eye on the caldera, are hiding data from the public.

The Praag article says that the South African government fears that placing so many Americans in South Africa could dramatically change the country.

“South Africa will not be part of the plan, because there is a risk that millions of white Americans could be sent to South Africa in an emergency situation and that this would pose a risk to black national culture identity,” Dr. Siph Matwetwe, spokesman for the Department of Foreign Affairs, is quoted as saying.

“We have our own challenges, even if there is enough housing and infrastructure available, it will destabilize the country and may even bring back apartheid.”

The gigantic volcano in Yellowstone has erupted three times over the last two million years, covering a huge area of surrounding land. Maps from educational institutions and government officials project that up to 17 states could be fully or partially impacted if the volcano erupted again. The far south of Canada could also get hit, as well as the far north of Mexico.

Scientists aren’t sure when it will erupt next, although many have sought to assure the public that it probably won’t for a while. In reality, the volcano could erupt at any time, though officials would in theory be able to detect an impending eruption and alert Americans to the threat.
http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/662...s-has-contingency-deal-with-brazil-australia/

http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fpraag.co.za%2F%3Fp%3D23549&edit-text=&act=url

File this tidbit under: Things that make you go Hmmm....

I also found the comments an interesting read.


And this also makes me wonder about a lot of other seemingly disconnected news items that might be related to this inevitable volcanic event if you were aware it was coming and you were trying to connect the dots right back to it.

Such as the notable rise in internet clatter from allegedly unnamed sources high in the government that some sort of national disaster might take place soon. Yet the disaster news bloggers never seem to really nail down what the cause of that natural or man made disaster might be that is supposedly looming menacingly on the horizon.

Not to mention the fact that at least one high ranking government official has also admitted as much, and without spilling the beans about any crucial details, like what that natural disaster might actually be they are preparing for.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...s-cyber-attackunprecedented-natural-disaster/

... and a natural disaster — the likes of which the nation has never seen — is also likely on its way. So prepare, and bring “a large bottle of Advil.”

Meanwhile, I also found this interesting and possibly relevant. It's a natural disaster hotspots report from the Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University.

The most obvious glaring omission I can find in this highly detailed global hazard report is relevant geological data relating to the Yellowstone super volcano is noticeably missing from this hazard report under volcanic threat assessments, except for possibly the first earthquake assessment. Surely The World Bank and Columbia University would not have simply overlooked or neglected to add natural disaster hazard assessments about the Yellowstone Super Volcano unless they were advised by someone higher up the food chain to remove or not include Yellowstone data in their otherwise detailed global natural hazard assessment report.

http://proceedings.esri.com/library/userconf/proc05/papers/pap2325.pdf

Moved from OT.

Perknose
Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mnewsham

Lifer
Oct 2, 2010
14,539
428
136
Housing isn't the main issue, transportation is, no way in hell would it matter unless you had several months of advanced warning to start shipping LARGE numbers of people elsewhere. Tent cities would make more sense anyway, but moving any significant number of americans would be nigh on impossible.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
58,400
8,691
126
Bring it on. Throw up some ash, and blot out the sun. We could use some cooling, and I could use a summer that doesn't suck.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,824
2,611
136
A website named theepochtimes is probably the equivalent of a supermarket tabloid for reliability.

I would expect the federal government to have at least some sort of contingency plan in place for as many potentially foreseeable future events as possible. It wouldn't surprise me if some sort of plan is penciled out for this. As far as the government "hiding" those plans from the public, well if you feel this is that likely a possibility go ahead and book your own tickets for Rio now.
 

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
Housing isn't the main issue, transportation is, no way in hell would it matter unless you had several months of advanced warning to start shipping LARGE numbers of people elsewhere. Tent cities would make more sense anyway, but moving any significant number of americans would be nigh on impossible.

I wonder how much emergency housing for how many people does 10 billion dollars buy, anyhow? What about building an infrastructure to support the housing? Obviously they would need at the very least water, sewage and trash pickups as well. Power would also be needed, but could be rationed as long as the basic needs were met. And how many of these foreign US colonies would be needed and in how many countries? And how many people would have to be relocated?

And as several posters already commented in the news article, part of the evacuation plan could include dividing refugees into ethnic or racial groups, at least as much as possible, depending on where the US colonies were. Then the racial concerns of the ANC would be partially addressed concerning a possible return to apartheid, which I doubt would happen to them just because of our evacuees in any case.

And concerning evacuating people and transportation. The first priority would be getting people in imminent danger out of the blast radius. Which means people would be traveling away in every possible direction to escape the pending eruption, at least if scientists knew it was pending, that is. If it happened suddenly in the span of minutes or even a few hours, then evacuation for those in the blast radius might not be possible, obviously. What they don't know is if it will be one quick, giant upheaval, or if it will be multiple large eruptions, or it could even go on for months or possibly even years with even smaller eruptions.

In any event, air transportation for most or all of the North American continent will likely be impossible. Which then limits possible evacuations to land (vehicles or railway) or water transportation.
 
Last edited:

mnewsham

Lifer
Oct 2, 2010
14,539
428
136
Oh no I live about 95 miles from the red dot. Should I be scared?

Nope, in fact you probably have it better than the rest of us, instant vaporization seems a lot easier than being shipped to south america for months/years.
 

mnewsham

Lifer
Oct 2, 2010
14,539
428
136
I wonder how much emergency housing for how many people does 10 billion dollars buy

well from my basic calculations, not fuckin much.

Just paying for food alone that might be enough money to feed 5-10 million people for a year.
 

SlickSnake

Diamond Member
May 29, 2007
5,235
2
0
Oh no I live about 95 miles from the red dot. Should I be scared?

I don't know, are you? If you look at the ash deposits on the graph, they look like they are generally carried by the wind somewhat away from Idaho. But that don't mean you wouldn't be buried under 10's or hundreds of feet of hot ash and lava if the winds were favorable.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
97,666
16,574
126
Housing isn't the main issue, transportation is, no way in hell would it matter unless you had several months of advanced warning to start shipping LARGE numbers of people elsewhere. Tent cities would make more sense anyway, but moving any significant number of americans would be nigh on impossible.

Plenty of cattle ships, car ships, container ships and oil tankers to ship all americans.
 

BarkingGhostar

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2009
8,409
1,617
136
The affected areas seem like a good thing to me. Oil refineries intact. SF still alive. Take out the anti-evolution Texans and Southern California. Yep, all good.
 

TwiceOver

Lifer
Dec 20, 2002
13,544
44
91
The affected areas seem like a good thing to me. Oil refineries intact. SF still alive. Take out the anti-evolution Texans and Southern California. Yep, all good.

Except the main source of the US food supply will be buried under a bunch of ash and not farmable. But who needs to eat, amirite.
 

disappoint

Lifer
Dec 7, 2009
10,132
382
126
Is this thing going to bury those religious nutters? Cause I was hoping they could be educated rather than eliminated. I'd like to vaporize religion, not the religious.

I guess the doomsday preppers need something else to talk about since 2012 fizzled. :rolleyes:

Don't give them any ideas. Those borderline paranoid schizos will run with it.
 

smitbret

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2006
3,382
17
81
Oh no I live about 95 miles from the red dot. Should I be scared?

Nah, if it goes, you and I will go with it. No time to evacuate. Personally, I'd rather go this way than through starvation because of the long winter that will follow.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Does any of this make sense? If Yellowstone's volcano does erupt, isn't it large enough that its ash will envelope the entire globe and affect every creature on earth? Fact is, no one will be safe from the disaster because it won't be limited to north America.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
19
81
Housing isn't the main issue, transportation is, no way in hell would it matter unless you had several months of advanced warning to start shipping LARGE numbers of people elsewhere. Tent cities would make more sense anyway, but moving any significant number of americans would be nigh on impossible.
It had better be a lot of boats, too.
Jet engines can ingest small birds and a rather astonishing amount of water, but not abrasive ash.
They'll just have to convert the oil supertankers into transport ships for people. I'm sure they can do that in a matter of hours. :D



Does any of this make sense? If Yellowstone's volcano does erupt, isn't it large enough that its ash will envelope the entire globe and affect every creature on earth? Fact is, no one will be safe from the disaster because it won't be limited to north America.
Exactly. The global climate will go nuts for awhile, likely crippling food production worldwide, and with most of the US's food production capabilities incinerated or buried under ash, we might have a chance of starving to death in a different country.
 
Last edited:

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,092
136
Does any of this make sense? If Yellowstone's volcano does erupt, isn't it large enough that its ash will envelope the entire globe and affect every creature on earth? Fact is, no one will be safe from the disaster because it won't be limited to north America.

Bingo.