WelshBloke
Lifer
- Jan 12, 2005
- 31,441
- 9,343
- 136
That documentary was released in January 2023.Are you stupid or didn't you read that the bans happened even when there was no BJP government in India?
That documentary was released in January 2023.Are you stupid or didn't you read that the bans happened even when there was no BJP government in India?
I think he is trying to make the argument that India bans all kind of shit under different governments so this is totally cool. Which completely misses the point.That documentary was released in January 2023.
That would be a terrible argument to make!I think he is trying to make the argument that India bans all kind of shit under different governments so this is totally cool. Which completely misses the point.
Evidence of his idiocy says otherwiseThat would be a terrible argument to make!
Like arguing that it's ok for China to censor stuff now because they censor stuff about Tiananmen square.
Not even Braznor is that much of an idiot.
That would be a terrible argument to make!
Like arguing that it's ok for China to censor stuff now because they censor stuff about Tiananmen square.
Not even Braznor is that much of an idiot.
You have a problem with a government tackling disinformation?
But but but it was just "normal political discourse"; it just happened to involve the deaths of 100s of Antifa (ie Muslims). No loss, so no big deal.Modi is like Trump in relation to 1/6, where he incites violent rioting and then technically isn't held criminally responsible because nothing they could find in his discharge of duties as a public official was technically a crime. It seems that no matter what legal system, fomenting a riot, in this case targetting "undesirable" groups with heated rhetoric which was reaonably likely to cause violence, is not a crime, particularly when done by a public official.
You better be careful then.You have a problem with a government tackling disinformation?
The government. Clearly what could possibly go wrong with that model?so who gets to define what is and what isn't disinformation?
Hey Bidelette,
There are plenty of articles on why the documentary is a hitjob in Indian sites. All you need is Google and a brain to access them all from the comfort of your home. Also all the slander in the documentary has already been proved false in the HIGHEST COURT OF LAW relevant to India and I wouldn't waste my time spoonfeeding you especially considering your motives here are as hollow as a pipe.
so who gets to define what is and what isn't disinformation?
That documentary was released in January 2023.
I think he is trying to make the argument that India bans all kind of shit under different governments so this is totally cool. Which completely misses the point.
That would be a terrible argument to make!
Like arguing that it's ok for China to censor stuff now because they censor stuff about Tiananmen square.
Not even Braznor is that much of an idiot.
Since you are slow, I will repeat it again slowly. Bear with me here:
Things....got.....Banned........even....before.....the.....BJP........government.
Is that slow enough for you? Or do you need a coloring book for me to illustrate the point to you?
Modi declared publicly that a bus fire in 2002 resulting in the deaths of 59 Hindu pilgrims was terrorist arson committed by local Muslims. The next day, rioting started, resulting in the deaths of at least 1000 people, most of them Muslim.
Years later Indian courts convicted a bunch of Muslims in relation to the arson, but what caused the fire is still disputed, with outside investigators still saying it was an accident.
But even if Modi was correct and certain Muslims were responsible, he said it was Muslims before there was sufficient proof of who was responsible. And there was a direct relationship between his public statements and the rioting, which started the next day. And none of that is even addressing the controversial issue of how the riots were handled by police once started, which is to say, that even if there was nothing wrong in any of that, Modi remains responsible for stoking those riots.
Modi is like Trump in relation to 1/6, where he incites violent rioting and then technically isn't held criminally responsible because nothing they could find in his discharge of duties as a public official was technically a crime. It seems that no matter what legal system, fomenting a riot, in this case targetting "undesirable" groups with heated rhetoric which was reaonably likely to cause violence, is not a crime, particularly when done by a public official.
Yet Modi is guilty of being a fascist piece of shit. Ethnic and religious nationalism are clear and present dangers to democracy in the world, including both India and the US.
So your argument really is "because things got banned before it's fine for Modi to ban whatever he wants"?Since you are slow, I will repeat it again slowly. Bear with me here:
Things....got.....Banned........even....before.....the.....BJP........government.
Is that slow enough for you? Or do you need a coloring book for me to illustrate the point to you?
'The only news that ever escapes the country is anti-Modi propaganda without facts. If you don't live here, you just can't know the reality on the ground. Yadda yadda yadda.'So your argument really is "because things got banned before it's fine for Modi to ban whatever he wants"?
Really?
Does Braznor live in Gujarat? I thought that he was posting from the US.'The only news that ever escapes the country is anti-Modi propaganda without facts. If you don't live here, you just can't know the reality on the ground. Yadda yadda yadda.'
You'll have to forgive his special flavor of clowntard. Don't bother using facts, they'll just deny or ignore them even worse than taj.
^^^ There's your fake news and disinformation campaign right there.Eh, the students were detained because they were creating trouble in the streets, not because they screened the documentary. It was the University personnel who approached the police to detain the students causing trouble and not Modi.
From some of his previous posts (and replies to such), it would seem he is in the US. Which makes those claims of, "well you'd have to BE there to know!" even funnier.Does Braznor live in Gujarat? I thought that he was posting from the US.
No, no, it's troublemakers making trouble, troublemakers always make trouble, looking to cause problems. What is this, China circa 1980?^^^ There's your fake news and disinformation campaign right there.
FWIW, I don't know how accurate the BBC documentary is...or isn't, but people SHOULD be allowed to make up their own minds.
