YART: reading dianetics

PatboyX

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2001
7,024
0
0
im only through the first few chapters but i was wondering if anyone here ever read it or was into scientology at all.
i think the book is interesting but it doesnt seem at all as though it is un-explored psychological/philosophical territory.
how did this catch on?
what are your thoughts on l. ron hubbard or scientology?
 

kranky

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
21,019
156
106
Scientology? The only religion who considers their doctrine to be trade secrets? I think they are nuts.

No offense to any Scientologists here. I've just been off the cans too long.
 

Thegonagle

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2000
9,773
0
71
Did you buy the book from some guy just so he would leave your front steps?

I did that once. I never did read that book though.

Good luck. I hope you know that they will NEVER stop mailing you crap. Even after I moved, they got my new forwarding address from the post office, and almost 5 years later, I still get junk mail from the scientologists. (Hand addressed, too!) I hope, for your sake, that you didn't give them your phone number.
 
May 31, 2001
15,326
2
0
Originally posted by: PatboyX
im only through the first few chapters but i was wondering if anyone here ever read it or was into scientology at all.
i think the book is interesting but it doesnt seem at all as though it is un-explored psychological/philosophical territory.
how did this catch on?
what are your thoughts on l. ron hubbard or scientology?

Wasn't that a religion made up as part of the conditions of a bet between Hubbard and Larry Niven?
 

atom

Diamond Member
Oct 18, 1999
4,722
1
0
It's from the same guy that made Battlefield Earth, that's all I need to know..........
 

XMan

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,513
49
91
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: PatboyX
im only through the first few chapters but i was wondering if anyone here ever read it or was into scientology at all.
i think the book is interesting but it doesnt seem at all as though it is un-explored psychological/philosophical territory.
how did this catch on?
what are your thoughts on l. ron hubbard or scientology?

Wasn't that a religion made up as part of the conditions of a bet between Hubbard and Larry Niven?

I thought it was Hubbard and Heinlein.

One way or another you're right though.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: PatboyX
im only through the first few chapters but i was wondering if anyone here ever read it or was into scientology at all.
i think the book is interesting but it doesnt seem at all as though it is un-explored psychological/philosophical territory.
how did this catch on?
what are your thoughts on l. ron hubbard or scientology?

do some research on them before you get to into it.

To get far into the "religion" you have to PAY to get the material.


out of all the religions Scientology is the only one i can say that i truly believe is %100 BULLSHIT.
 

NightCrawler

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 2003
3,179
0
0
Heard a guy who had look into it 20 years ago and they still call and write to him. He's moved about a dozen times and had numerous phone numbers but they always seem to find him. He only went to a meeting cause he liked a girl that was into it.

They sure are determined people.
 

PatboyX

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2001
7,024
0
0
well, im reading the book because i like to read. it was 75 cents from a local used book store and i remember the commercials and as much as i like to make fun of the group, i know very little about it.
i remember when i lived in london seeing billboards on the tube about their version of a revival where you would pay 1000 bucks to get tested to see how "clear" you were.
anyway, i find religion fascinating and although im not sure this strictly counts as theology, most people consider it a religion so i figured "hell, might as well read the book."
im not really looking to be recruited into any religion. i was just wondering what you guys thought of it.
 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: PatboyX
im only through the first few chapters but i was wondering if anyone here ever read it or was into scientology at all.
i think the book is interesting but it doesnt seem at all as though it is un-explored psychological/philosophical territory.
how did this catch on?
what are your thoughts on l. ron hubbard or scientology?

Wasn't that a religion made up as part of the conditions of a bet between Hubbard and Larry Niven?


L Ron is a fraud, just Google him & you'll find some interesting results. Scientologists are litegenous & if the stuff was lies, they'd have it taken down, sue the author:

Probably the most detailed and damaging revelations concerning the myths Scientology has crafted about Hubbard occurred in a court of law. Gerald Armstrong introduced devastating documents into testimony during his trial in a 1984 suit brought against him by the Church of Scientology.

Armstrong had been a devoted member of Sea Org (a branch of the Scientolgy organization). He was also a close aid to Hubbard, who had approved him as "Personal Public Relations Research Officer" for Hubbard's Biography Project (Jon Atack, A Piece of Blue Sky, pp. 328-9, 333).

Armstrong began to collect and compile an enormous amount of extant Hubbard documents which included letters, diaries, medical records and official documents relating to Hubbard's earlier years. When Armstrong began to discover that reality had little resemblance to Hubbard's own autobiography, he left the church. Feeling threatened, he copied and/or kept the documents for his own protection.

Scientology sued Armstrong, charging him with stealing their private papers. Scientology lost the case and the evidence and documents presented in the case brought about critically revealing statements by Judge Paul Breckenridge of the Los Angeles Superior Court. He wrote, "The organization [Scientology] clearly is schizophrenic and paranoid, and this bizarre combination seems to be a reflection of its founder, LRH. The evidence portrays a man who has been virtually a pathological liar when it comes to his history, background, and achievements" (Church of Scientology v. Armstrong, No. C420153 California Supreme Court, 1984).

Armstrong demonstrated, through the documents, that contrary to Hubbard's claims, he was not educated in higher mathematics or physics, did not obtain a bachelor of science degree, was not a civil engineer, nor a nuclear physicist, was not in China at age 14, and lied about the time he did spend traveling in Asia, did not study with Lama priests, was never in India, was not crippled and blinded during the war, was not twice pronounced dead, did not cure himself with his discoveries, was not awarded 21 medals and palms, did not see combat, and that Hubbard had lied about many other things to embellish his image (Croydon and Hubbard, Jr., L. Ron Hubbard: Messiah or Madman?, pp. 220-2).