Fingolfin269
Lifer
- Feb 28, 2003
- 17,948
- 31
- 91
Originally posted by: BDawg
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: BDawg
Originally posted by: Queasy
Backwards compatability is not the big selling point that Sony is pushing and MS already matched the PS3 with HD-DVD.
I don't see them as equal. HD-DVD won't be installed on but a fraction of XBOX360s for quite a while.
Even after they arrive as standard equipment, they won't be any better than the SegaCD. There won't be a lot of exclusive content because devs won't want to fragment the userbase.
Of course they are not equal. The reason being: MS gives you a CHOICE. Do I want to buy the HD player? No? Well, cool because now I don't have to since it is a separate transaction. However, Sony has forced their technology upon you and now you get to pay a premium for it whether you have a 19" crapper TV or a greatest TV ever 1080P set.
Nobody complained when the PS2 / XBOX came with DVD instead of CD drives. I see this as the same.
Even if Blu-Ray fails as a movie format, at least the system will be able to make use of massive ammounts of storage.
I think Blu-Ray is a great choice for a storage medium that happens to synergize well with other Sony marketing efforts. It's just tragic that they have so many delays with it.
But we're talking about a gaming system here and not what people are going to use as a storage device. The difference between this generation and PS2/Xbox is that the two were priced comparably and both had the same base technology in their drives. This time Sony is forcing you to upgrade while MS is letting you decide if you really want to as reflected in the price.
You also have to take into account the price of the drive technology at the time of production. How many people do you know with HD-DVD/Blu-Ray drives at their house right now? How many people did you know with DVD players in their house at the time of the PS2/Xbox release?
