cytg111
Lifer
- Mar 17, 2008
- 23,203
- 12,852
- 136
Well, killing everything makes a wall unneeded. It's come to be expected that trivial things of dubious value are seen as being the highest priority, like winning a COD game in the middle of a wildfire that has left a possible escape route lasting mere minutes. I'm fortunate(?) in having access to original research and the ability to process the means and methods (nice to be married to a professor and get papers and journals) and not rely on the internet except as a gross filter.
Things really are bad, so bad that belief is suspended by more than Slow.
In its simplicity you are of course right. Killing everything negates the need for a wall.
However I suspect on the road towards killing everything a wall will come in handy, actually no, you'll need a mine field, massive mine fields, both at land and at sea to counter the mass migrations that climate change will create. With a little luck you can have and be done with your little brewing civil war in time to for the BIG ONE.
#FAKESCIENCE