YAGT: What firearm would you use in a post nuclear world?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

AstroManLuca

Lifer
Jun 24, 2004
15,628
5
81
Post-apocalypse, I'd probably want something reliable with really common ammo. A .22 rifle, an AK, any 12ga shotgun, and maybe a 9mm pistol.

Finding guns that share ammo might be a good idea as well. Like a revolver and carbine in .357 or .44 magnum. Ammo isn't as common though.
 
Last edited:

Farmer

Diamond Member
Dec 23, 2003
3,334
2
81
Post-apocalypse, I'd probably want something reliable with common ammo. A .22 rifle, any 12ga shotgun, and maybe a 9mm pistol.

Your pathetic .22 and 9mm will do nothing halt the overwhelming hoards of mutant cockroaches.
 

coxmaster

Diamond Member
Dec 14, 2007
3,017
3
81
As others have said, I'd take an AK as my primary/only rifle. Plenty of experience shooting it, it is accurate enough, and ammo is plentiful
 

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
197
106
OP:

That is like the 100th time you posted that same photo of your FAL. Maybe some new action shots.

When I posted the OP, I was thinking the same thing. I will get some new pics taken this weekend.

My wife and I are supposed to go fishing saturday, I'll see if I can get some pics of the rifle with the river in the background. Or maybe some pics with cypress trees in the background.
 
Last edited:

Farmer

Diamond Member
Dec 23, 2003
3,334
2
81
When I posted the OP, I was thinking the same thing. I will get some new pics taken this weekend.

My wife and I are supposed to go fishing saturday, I'll see if I can get some picks of the rifle with the river in the background. Or maybe some pics with cypress trees in the background.

Or some pics of it ejecting hot brass.
 

Juddog

Diamond Member
Dec 11, 2006
7,851
6
81
What - no love for the AA12?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOoUVeyaY_8
Heartland&
 

Unheard

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2003
3,773
9
81
Depends on what region I am in. US/NATO countries, something chambered in .223. Former comblock countries, something in 7.62x39mm.
 

edro

Lifer
Apr 5, 2002
24,326
68
91
AK47

Africa IS post nuclear type society, and it works great there.
 

spacejamz

Lifer
Mar 31, 2003
10,865
1,510
126
The correct answer to your question would be "Whatever weapon I can get my hands on".

Would someone who had previously answered earlier found a weapon different than what they said actually put it back down and keeping looking for another one???

Sorry, its a 9mm, don't want...
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
A .22 revolver with a 6 inch bbl would def be one choice. Should work forever, can carry a lot of ammo with me, and ammo should be plentiful everywhere. Maybe get one with a .22mag cylinder for flexibility.

A bolt action rifle in a very common caliber like .30-06.
 

DominionSeraph

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
8,386
31
91
Going by specs on battle rifles, I'd say SCAR-H. It's a decent bit lighter than the FN/FAL.

scarhcqc.jpg


Sidearm, I'm most familiar with the Beretta M9, so I'd probably want one of those to start.
They're not the lightest of things, though, so I'd probably want to switch out at some point.
 

skyking

Lifer
Nov 21, 2001
22,363
5,322
146
Ruger 10-22.
I can keep it going, having put 12,000 rounds through mine over the last 30 years or so.
I can carry those 12,000 rounds as well. I don't expect to get into firefights, I just need to shoot something to eat.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
11
81
If Fallout taught me anything, its that I want a Plasma Caster in a post apocalyptic wasteland.
 
Feb 6, 2007
16,432
1
81
RFB's an 8 lb compact 20 shot .308. Not the lightest or shortest, but very carry-able and capable of relatively long shots (I've heard up to 500 yards) accurately. Plus still legal in most states in case I meet up with an overzealous cop. :)
I'm pretty sure in the event of nuclear apocalypse, the cops aren't going to be too concerned with enforcing existing gun laws.
 

Macamus Prime

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2011
3,108
0
0
If you survived, I guess you need guns to shoot,.... the piles of burnt human ooze?

Or, if you survived, then it's safe to assume others like you survived. And who would that be, city folks? Doubtful. Folks who have bunkers, weapons and food? Very probable. And, they would think and act just like you. So, no need to shoot them, is there?

What exactly are you defending yourself from? Chances are, the very people you hate will be dead and long gone.

The fear of nuclear "monsters" is all sci-fi Hollywood.

And, you wouldn't want to hunt radioactive animals to eat. I would imagine its best to avoid things that move around (like INTO radioactive areas) and focus on food you know won't hit you with radiation posion.