YAGT: pr0n and relationships

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

engineereeyore

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2005
2,070
0
0
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Does this imply that you're also for limiting the frequency of sex between married couples?

Not that I can imagine. I don't see where that's anyone's business but theirs. As long as they're in agreement on it, I don't see any problems.
 

engineereeyore

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2005
2,070
0
0
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Once again, you equate masturbation and molestation. Let's roleplay - I'm a drunken frat boy who's eying up your sister at a house party. Should I decide to leave her be and go beat off after she leaves, or rape her at knifepoint in a dark alley on her way home? I mean, they're both giving into my desires, right? No difference, right?

I'm doing no such thing and never have. If a parent screams at their children and hits the wall and then that child grows up to be a wife beater, does that equate the two? No. Is there a correlation between the two? Very likely. It's the same thing. The child is taught that controlling oneself in such a way, or not controlling I should say, is okay. Such a person would likely grow up with a large amount of anger and be a very physical person.

Like it or not, your body is wired to enjoy sex, and requires a periodic cleaning of the pipes. Ergo, wet dreams if you don't beat off.

Hey, I'll be the first to tell you sex is great. I wouldn't dream of making a claim that it isn't.

A straw man by nature is not a valid point. And I tossed aside two perfectly invalid pieces of anecdotal evidence. Maybe if Mommy had put out a little more often and/or hadn't been so uppity about Daddy taking things into his own hands when she didn't, little Junior wouldn't have walked in on him brushing the babysitter's teeth with that pink toothbrush. Ditto for the failed marriages - if masturbation is that much of a (heh) sticking point that it's cause for divorce - GUESS WHAT, YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE GOTTEN MARRIED IN THE FIRST PLACE. Maybe the two of them should have aired such things in the open before tying the knot, or heaven help us all - had filthy, dirty, heathenistic, wonderful premarital sex.

- M4H

You're welcome to such an opinion if you wish. You can blame the wife all you wish for not letting daddy do anything he wanted. Heaven forbid he actually be held accountable for his actions. Sounds to me like the voice of a guilty party trying to justify their own actions. :Q
 

child of wonder

Diamond Member
Aug 31, 2006
8,307
176
106
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
You couldn't be more wrong. Also, Mormons do not believe oral sex is a sin. That is a myth.

That's not true.

http://www.lds-mormon.com/worthy_letter.shtml

Now, church leaders are not to specifically inquire about member's sex lives nor give direct counsel regarding oral sex, but the church's stance on the subject is quite clear.

Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Again, that's just wrong. Seeing as I doubt you've ever been part of an Endowment, you should really stop talking. You look pretty stupid.

I know much more than you think about the Endowment Ceremony. My in laws are Mormons and my wife is an ex-Mormon.

But, please, would you tell people a bit about what goes on during an Endowment Ceremony so they can see how stupid I am?
 
Aug 23, 2000
15,509
1
81
Originally posted by: sixone
Originally posted by: cKGunslinger
Originally posted by: sixone
I don't get the attraction for porn at all, for someone who has sex available regularly. If you want to do it, DO IT. Why watch someone else do something that you've already seen done 14.368 times already? I guess if you're too lazy to use your own imagination, then porn would be attractive to you.

If you think real life is anything like what you see in a porn flick, you need serious help. And if you understand that it isn't, then what's the point? You have an SO or a hand, and an imagination, use it.

I know! It's like, why would anyone go to a comedy club or watch a SciFi movie? They can tell their own jokes and make laser sounds with their mouths! Pew-pew!

Ban entertainment!


(<-- Not a pornography watcher.)

At a comedy club, you're seeing a live show, having a few drinks and some laughs with other people. How you could be a Raptor pilot IRL would be a little more difficult. In other words, you're getting more than you would in front of your TV set.

Porn is a second-rate experience, compared to the real thing.

Playing Microsoft Flight Simulator is second rate compared to the real thing. So why should I play any video game? Because it's FUN.

People view pornography as bad because of jealousy/insecurity.
The claim that it is degrading/exploitive of women is horse poop. 1,000's of women wouldn't be willingly getting into porn because it was bad. Some do it for the money, others do it because they love sex. You can't say it demeans women, it demeans YOU personally.

edit: BTW, nice bias poll. Where's the option of I watch it because I can or I watch it because it's fun, or I watch it to piss off people that think it's degrading to women?
 

ric1287

Diamond Member
Nov 29, 2005
4,845
0
0
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: ric1287
wow, just wow. If you can seriously say that masturbation and child molesting have about the same negative consequences you need to have you head examined.

If you had actually read what I wrote, you'd realize I never made such a claim.

"Yes I would. Very easily. Both are examples of an inability to control sexual desires. So where do you draw the distinction upon which are 'right' and which are 'wrong'. When they hurt someone? Well guess what, that's already happened on both sides. "

where do you draw the line!?? If you can't see that obvious of a line, then there is something seriously wrong with you.
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
I'm doing no such thing and never have. If a parent screams at their children and hits the wall and then that child grows up to be a wife beater, does that equate the two? No. Is there a correlation between the two? Very likely. It's the same thing. The child is taught that controlling oneself in such a way, or not controlling I should say, is okay. Such a person would likely grow up with a large amount of anger and be a very physical person.

Reminder to self: plant lots of grain this year, engineereeyore is making arguments and needs lots of straw.

Hey, I'll be the first to tell you sex is great. I wouldn't dream of making a claim that it isn't.

At least you have that part of your brain wired correctly.

You're welcome to such an opinion if you wish. You can blame the wife all you wish for not letting daddy do anything he wanted. Heaven forbid he actually be held accountable for his actions.

Argument was anecdotal evidence in the first place, but again - maybe if they'd aired their sexual behaviours with each other first, Daddy could have gone off to be happy with his second wife as the first wife, and Mommy could have married some other sexually repressed excuse for a human skin.

Sounds to me like the voice of a guilty party trying to justify their own actions. :Q

http://www.widhh.com/

- M4H
 

engineereeyore

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2005
2,070
0
0
Originally posted by: child of wonder
That's not true.

http://www.lds-mormon.com/worthy_letter.shtml

Now, church leaders are not to specifically inquire about member's sex lives nor give direct counsel regarding oral sex, but the church's stance on the subject is quite clear.

I have never seen such a proclamation. I will look into it and check it's validity.

I know much more than you think about the Endowment Ceremony. My in laws are Mormons and my wife is an ex-Mormon.

But, please, would you tell people a bit about what goes on during an Endowment Ceremony so they can see how stupid I am?

No, I won't tell you what happens during the Endowment ceremony. But I will tell you there is no 'blessing of the balls' in the Endowment. So like I said, wrong.
 

trmiv

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
14,670
18
81
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
You're trying to parallel masturbators with child molestors and rapists. I don't think there's a rolleyes.gif big enough in the world for that one.

Yes I would. Very easily. Both are examples of an inability to control sexual desires. So where do you draw the distinction upon which are 'right' and which are 'wrong'. When they hurt someone? Well guess what, that's already happened on both sides.

I'm not saying that masturbation is the cause of these types of actions. As I said before, the attitude that sexual desires should be embraced and not criticized is the problem. Telling someone that if they have a sexual desire, they should fulfill it, is going to give them the idea that such is always the case. How do you justify saying one is okay and the other is not? Again, you can't use "as long as it doesn't hurt someone else", because like I said, this thread wouldn't exist if that was the case.

You've got to be kidding me. It's called being able to tell right from wrong. People who just jerk off are normal, but people molest kids are sickos. How do you even make the leap from someone being told jerking off is OK, to them assuming molesting a kid is OK?



 

engineereeyore

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2005
2,070
0
0
Originally posted by: ric1287
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: ric1287
wow, just wow. If you can seriously say that masturbation and child molesting have about the same negative consequences you need to have you head examined.

If you had actually read what I wrote, you'd realize I never made such a claim.

"Yes I would. Very easily. Both are examples of an inability to control sexual desires. So where do you draw the distinction upon which are 'right' and which are 'wrong'. When they hurt someone? Well guess what, that's already happened on both sides. "

where do you draw the line!?? If you can't see that obvious of a line, then there is something seriously wrong with you.

Paralleling two things and claiming they have the same negative consequences is not even close to being the same. Both share a large number of similarities, thus their parallelism. Are they identical in severity? Obviously not.

As for where I draw the line, I believe any sexual act outside of marriage is wrong. As for in marriage relationships, I'll leave that between the couple. That's their business, not mine. Again, just my opinion.
 

engineereeyore

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2005
2,070
0
0
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Reminder to self: plant lots of grain this year, engineereeyore is making arguments and needs lots of straw.

So is that how you respond to all arguments you can't win?

At least you have that part of your brain wired correctly.

Well thanks. I think it functions rather well. I don't have to worry about out-of-marriage children, STD's, getting caught, or any other side-effect. Seems to be working nicely to me.

Argument was anecdotal evidence in the first place, but again - maybe if they'd aired their sexual behaviors with each other first, Daddy could have gone off to be happy with his second wife as the first wife, and Mommy could have married some other sexually repressed excuse for a human skin.

Point conceded, and I agree. I feel people should be more open about their sexual wants and desires prior to marriage. However, tell me a woman that is going to marry a man who says "I demand sex 3 times a day, 7 days a week, every day of the year, and if you don't give it to me, I'll get it elsewhere". Or perhaps, as I said, he could have learned a little self control.


Oh, no worries. This is a message board. Only reading is required. Don't need to hear, but thanks for the link.
 

thecoolnessrune

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2005
9,673
583
126
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Once again, you equate masturbation and molestation. Let's roleplay - I'm a drunken frat boy who's eying up your sister at a house party.
- M4H

Shouldn't be too hard for you, I've certainly never seen you act any better on this forum :laugh:

 

engineereeyore

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2005
2,070
0
0
Originally posted by: trmiv
You've got to be kidding me. It's called being able to tell right from wrong. People who just jerk off are normal, but people molest kids are sickos. How do you even make the leap from someone being told jerking off is OK, to them assuming molesting a kid is OK?

Yes, being able to tell right from wrong. Now tell me how many 13 years you feel confident can accurately tell the difference between the two? I'd agree, molesters are sickos. But how many of them just wake up and say, "I think I'll molest someone today." Where do you think it starts for them?

Here a good read.

Convicted felons on sexual activities
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,695
31,043
146
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: child of wonder
That's not true.

http://www.lds-mormon.com/worthy_letter.shtml

Now, church leaders are not to specifically inquire about member's sex lives nor give direct counsel regarding oral sex, but the church's stance on the subject is quite clear.

I have never seen such a proclamation. I will look into it and check it's validity.

I know much more than you think about the Endowment Ceremony. My in laws are Mormons and my wife is an ex-Mormon.

But, please, would you tell people a bit about what goes on during an Endowment Ceremony so they can see how stupid I am?

No, I won't tell you what happens during the Endowment ceremony. But I will tell you there is no 'blessing of the balls' in the Endowment. So like I said, wrong.


Is that where you walk into the temple, with the holy "box" or whatever it is, and must wear the holy underwear? It's been awhile, but this is one of the first things I remember.
Is the endowment before or after you are granted your own planet, inhabited by yourself and your many wives? ;)

Also, that document doesn't mention anything specifically regarding oral sex. Only "Homosexual acts, including lesbian, or other unnatural, impure, or unholy practices."
I suppose he's assuming oral sex would be included within the last 3 categories.

Interesting, this gives each mormon priest, or whatever they're called, free reign to decide what is impure, I suppose....
 

NaOH

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2006
5,015
0
0
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: moshquerade
you weren't raised Mormon?

Not really. My mother was mormon, but that's it. The rest of my family was Pentecostal and Southern Baptist. As I was very unfamiliar with Mormon doctrine until I was 18, I say it's a far stretch to say I was raised Mormon.

why do you have such a hang up over self-gratification? if going on that theory you shouldn't be allowed to ever eat ice cream.

again, we don't agree on this, but i am only trying to understand your basis for this reasoning.

Oh that fine. I realize we're just having a pleasant, or at least I consider it pleasant, talk about this.

Consider your eating ice cream example. When is enough enough? Does ice cream ever stop tasting good? I know I've never found bad tasting ice cream (except strawberry, never really liked that). The point is that the body has very natural desires and there are various level at which each should be embrassed. Food is obviously one of them. I'd love to eat steak every night of the week, but I know I can't.

Sexual desires, just like food, I feel need to be constrained. For everything, even sex, there is a time and a season. Our ideals obviously vary on what the time and season are, but simply because something is natural doesn't make it right. I see this need for self-gratification as being a huge problem in many areas, specifically sex, finances, food, drugs, etc.

Credit cards are an awful example, or I should say a perfect example. "I NEED this flat-panel TV. I NEED this new car. I NEED this huge house." We live in a world were people are encouraged to gratify themselves and ignore the consequences. Now will masturbation make anyone go blind? Will it give you masturbation elbow (honestly, I have no idea)? No, for the most part I don't think it's actually going to hurt people very often, unless you're in a relationship. But what is does do is promote the idea that if you want something, you should get it. That, I believe, is where the danger lies.

I know we don't agree, but does that make sense? I'm trying my best to explain it.

No you're not making anysense. That whole paragraph was devoid of any logic whatsoever. Sorry
 

NaOH

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2006
5,015
0
0
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
I understand the difference quite well, as I have stated several times. What you are failing to see is that encouraging someone that they should fulfill their sexual desires can only contribute to such situations.

Once again, you equate masturbation and molestation. Let's roleplay - I'm a drunken frat boy who's eying up your sister at a house party. Should I decide to leave her be and go beat off after she leaves, or rape her at knifepoint in a dark alley on her way home? I mean, they're both giving into my desires, right? No difference, right?

If everyone was able to control their sexual desires, would such events happen? No. Now tell me, is masturbating an example of controlling your sexual desires? Some may feel it is, I personally don't. I don't think we're ever going to agree on this, and I understand your argument. But personally, I feel I have a pretty valid one myself.

Like it or not, your body is wired to enjoy sex, and requires a periodic cleaning of the pipes. Ergo, wet dreams if you don't beat off.

Yes, and again, my point stands.

Denied, see above.

Straw man or not, it's a valid point. I also see that you just tossed the other two valid points aside. Heaven forbid there be an actual logical and legitimate reason someone doesn't agree with you.

A straw man by nature is not a valid point. And I tossed aside two perfectly invalid pieces of anecdotal evidence. Maybe if Mommy had put out a little more often and/or hadn't been so uppity about Daddy taking things into his own hands when she didn't, little Junior wouldn't have walked in on him brushing the babysitter's teeth with that pink toothbrush. Ditto for the failed marriages - if masturbation is that much of a (heh) sticking point that it's cause for divorce - GUESS WHAT, YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE GOTTEN MARRIED IN THE FIRST PLACE. Maybe the two of them should have aired such things in the open before tying the knot, or heaven help us all - had filthy, dirty, heathenistic, wonderful premarital sex.

- M4H

M4H is the funny
 

trmiv

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
14,670
18
81
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: trmiv
You've got to be kidding me. It's called being able to tell right from wrong. People who just jerk off are normal, but people molest kids are sickos. How do you even make the leap from someone being told jerking off is OK, to them assuming molesting a kid is OK?

Yes, being able to tell right from wrong. Now tell me how many 13 years you feel confident can accurately tell the difference between the two? I'd agree, molesters are sickos. But how many of them just wake up and say, "I think I'll molest someone today." Where do you think it starts for them?

Here a good read.

Convicted felons on sexual activities

It sure as hell doesn't start because they discovered beating off. Normal people that aren't F'd in the head can beat off and never think about molesting kids. If people are sick in the head and get turned on by children, they are going to molest a kid regardless.
 

AbAbber2k

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2005
6,474
1
0
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: moshquerade
you weren't raised Mormon?

Not really. My mother was mormon, but that's it. The rest of my family was Pentecostal and Southern Baptist. As I was very unfamiliar with Mormon doctrine until I was 18, I say it's a far stretch to say I was raised Mormon.

And how exactly do you maintain your stance that your qualms over masturbation are purely your own? Regardless of being "officially" indoctrinated, you were raised with HEAVY religious beliefs/values, at least half of which were Mormon influenced.

:roll:
 

engineereeyore

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2005
2,070
0
0
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Is that where you walk into the temple, with the holy "box" or whatever it is, and must wear the holy underwear? It's been awhile, but this is one of the first things I remember.
Is the endowment before or after you are granted your own planet, inhabited by yourself and your many wives? ;)

Don't remember a holy 'box', never got my own planet, and only have one wife. Hmm, I must be going to the wrong temple. ;)

Also, that document doesn't mention anything specifically regarding oral sex. Only "Homosexual acts, including lesbian, or other unnatural, impure, or unholy practices."
I suppose he's assuming oral sex would be included within the last 3 categories.

Interesting, this gives each mormon priest, or whatever they're called, free reign to decide what is impure, I suppose....

I thought the same thing, but here is a line.

The First Presidency has interpretted oral sex as constituting an unnatural, impure, or unholy practice.

Now I'll admit, I've never heard any such thing. I'm looking up this document to verify that it exist, but so far haven't found it. I'd be lying if I said I didn't have some reservations about the validity of it.
 

engineereeyore

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2005
2,070
0
0
Originally posted by: NaOH
No you're not making any sense. That whole paragraph was devoid of any logic whatsoever. Sorry

As I said, I don't expect everyone to accept it, agree with it, or in your case, even understand it. But that's your choice. The ideas presented make perfect sense. Perhaps try and read it again.
 

engineereeyore

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2005
2,070
0
0
Originally posted by: trmiv
It sure as hell doesn't start because they discovered beating off. Normal people that aren't F'd in the head can beat off and never think about molesting kids. If people are sick in the head and get turned on by children, they are going to molest a kid regardless.

I'm sure you don't think that had anything to do with. To admit is might would be to admit I have a valid point, and I don't expect you'll ever do that. Everything starts somewhere. I've never stated or claimed that people who masturbate are automatically going to become sexual predators or child molesters. Are all people who drink going to drive drunk or get liver cancer? All acts have repercussions, all of them. They're not the same for everyone and never will be. I tend to be one of those people who would rather not take the chance. If there is a possibility that what I am currently doing could directly lead me to do something much worse, I will avoid doing it. It's that simple. If you don't feel that way, fine. Whatever. It's your life. But tell me again why you're criticizing me for trying to control my bodily urges. If anything, it's only helping you. It dang sure isn't hurting you. And I'm not condemning you to hell or anything else for being involved in it. So what's your problem?
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
So is that how you respond to all arguments you can't win?

Bullshit, lettuce doesn't cause brain damage.

Well thanks. I think it functions rather well. I don't have to worry about out-of-marriage children, STD's, getting caught, or any other side-effect. Seems to be working nicely to me.

You know, there's another perfectly healthy sexual practice that has also never caused any children out of wedlock, STDs, or other nasty side effects. It's called masturbation. You should try it.

Point conceded, and I agree. I feel people should be more open about their sexual wants and desires prior to marriage. However, tell me a woman that is going to marry a man who says "I demand sex 3 times a day, 7 days a week, every day of the year, and if you don't give it to me, I'll get it elsewhere".

A nymphomaniac.

Or perhaps, as I said, he could have learned a little self control.

Or he can jerk off 3x7x365 with exceptions for sex, and all is well.

Oh, no worries. This is a message board. Only reading is required. Don't need to hear, but thanks for the link.

Well, just in case you decided to give into the filthy temptation of natural predisposition, spank the monkey, end up blind, and have to use a text-to-speech convertor, I figured you could use a hand.

- M4H
 

KingofCamelot

Golden Member
Aug 20, 2004
1,074
0
0
Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: trmiv
It sure as hell doesn't start because they discovered beating off. Normal people that aren't F'd in the head can beat off and never think about molesting kids. If people are sick in the head and get turned on by children, they are going to molest a kid regardless.

I'm sure you don't think that had anything to do with. To admit is might would be to admit I have a valid point, and I don't expect you'll ever do that. Everything starts somewhere. I've never stated or claimed that people who masturbate are automatically going to become sexual predators or child molesters. Are all people who drink going to drive drunk or get liver cancer? All acts have repercussions, all of them. They're not the same for everyone and never will be. I tend to be one of those people who would rather not take the chance.

90% of serial killers eat cookies.
70% lacked control over their cookie urges.

People who eat cookies have a higher chance of becoming serial killers.

You'd better stop eating cookies. ;)
 

engineereeyore

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2005
2,070
0
0
Originally posted by: AbAbber2k
And how exactly do you maintain your stance that your qualms over masturbation are purely your own? Regardless of being "officially" indoctrinated, you were raised with HEAVY religious beliefs/values, at least half of which were Mormon influenced.

:roll:

No, I was not raised with heavy beliefs, but yes with values. My father encouraged masturbation, so wheres your point now? The day I told my father I was planning to marry my wife, his advice to me was that I need to go out and get more sex first. Play the field more. Though you may share the same opinion, tell me. Why would I ruin what I had with my fiancee? Why would I want to introduce worries of pregnancy and STD's into my life? They sure sound fun, but you know, I think I'll pass.

As I stated before, my Mormon *indoctrination* didn't happen until I was 18. But you keep holding to that, seeing as it's all you've got.
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Originally posted by: thecoolnessrune
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Once again, you equate masturbation and molestation. Let's roleplay - I'm a drunken frat boy who's eying up your sister at a house party.
- M4H

Shouldn't be too hard for you, I've certainly never seen you act any better on this forum :laugh:

High-five! :beer::D

- M4H
 

cKGunslinger

Lifer
Nov 29, 1999
16,408
57
91
Originally posted by: ryan256
Originally posted by: sixone
At a comedy club, you're seeing a live show, having a few drinks and some laughs with other people. How you could be a Raptor pilot IRL would be a little more difficult. In other words, you're getting more than you would in front of your TV set.

Porn is a second-rate experience, compared to the real thing.

:thumbsup:

Well, no sh1t.

Watching a movie on TV is a second-rate experience compared to watching it on an Imax screen.

Listening to a music CD is a second-rate experience compared to being at a live concert.

Eating Hamburger Helper on your couch is a second-rate experience to eating a nice meal at a fine restaurant.

So are you saying nobody should every do any of those things, since they are obviously depriving themselves of the "real" experience? I'm failing to see anything resembling a point in your quips.