They are generally the diameter of the bullet...Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
What do calibre numbers mean?
Originally posted by: Buck_Naked
One problem that hasn't been addressed to my knowledge is the magazines... They developed a different magazine because the cartridge shape is slightly different than the 5.56 round, and it isn't clear if current M-16 magazines will hold more than 10-12 round of the new cartridge.
I don't suppose you got that link from Gyrene did you...?
Originally posted by: Buck_Naked
One problem that hasn't been addressed to my knowledge is the magazines... They developed a different magazine because the cartridge shape is slightly different than the 5.56 round, and it isn't clear if current M-16 magazines will hold more than 10-12 round of the new cartridge.
I don't suppose you got that link from Gyrene did you...?
Existing 5.56 mm magazines can easily be modified to shoot both 6.8 mm and 5.56 mm, using a new follower and slight modification to the feed lips. Since the magazines can still shoot 5.56 mm, they are still BATF legal. When modified this way, a typical GI 30 rd 5.56 mm mag will take 25 or 26 rounds of 6.8 mm. FWIW, all of our initial SPC testing was done using existing 5.56 mm magazines, NOT the new 28 rd PRI 6.8 mm specific mags.
The thread you linked appears to have enough posters with ballistics expertise to successfully develop a thriving small arms industry of their own.Originally posted by: Shockwave
Text
Interesting. A drop in upper that changes the M series guns from 5.56 to 6.8 caliber. Seems to give more knock down power. Thoughts?
Originally posted by: burnedout
The thread you linked appears to have enough posters with ballistics expertise to successfully develop a thriving small arms industry of their own.Originally posted by: Shockwave
Text
Interesting. A drop in upper that changes the M series guns from 5.56 to 6.8 caliber. Seems to give more knock down power. Thoughts?
Heh, there is even a copy of an e-mail from Dr. Fackler himself.
Originally posted by: Buck_Naked
They are generally the diameter of the bullet...Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
What do calibre numbers mean?
Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
Originally posted by: Buck_Naked
They are generally the diameter of the bullet...Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
What do calibre numbers mean?
So saying something is 6.8 calibre is the same as saying it's 6.8mm?
Originally posted by: yllus
While we're asking questions, what does the term "magnum" mean? Anything other than a heavier powder load? (I was just informed of that meaning.)
The jury is still out on whether or not that will work. There are rumors of someone offering a replacement mag body in exchange for a M-16 mag body. Time will tell if just changing out the follower will allow reliable functioning with the round. All the feedback I have heard regarding the upper has been the use of the spec'ed LE/Military mags, and have heard nothing about functioning with a modified mag. If the AWB were too sunset, it would make it all moot... Write your respective politicians if you have any interest in seeing that happen...Originally posted by: Mookow
Originally posted by: Buck_Naked
One problem that hasn't been addressed to my knowledge is the magazines... They developed a different magazine because the cartridge shape is slightly different than the 5.56 round, and it isn't clear if current M-16 magazines will hold more than 10-12 round of the new cartridge.
I don't suppose you got that link from Gyrene did you...?
Existing 5.56 mm magazines can easily be modified to shoot both 6.8 mm and 5.56 mm, using a new follower and slight modification to the feed lips. Since the magazines can still shoot 5.56 mm, they are still BATF legal. When modified this way, a typical GI 30 rd 5.56 mm mag will take 25 or 26 rounds of 6.8 mm. FWIW, all of our initial SPC testing was done using existing 5.56 mm magazines, NOT the new 28 rd PRI 6.8 mm specific mags.