YAFFT: Moss for Chambers?

[scarfase99]

Here's teh scenario:
Keeper League i've had for 3 years
I have Randy Moss
he never plays, as i also have: Steve Smith, Housh & Andre Johnson
BUT, i also have Ronnie Brown from MIA

Someone offered me Chris Chambers for Randy Moss.

Would you do it?

 

[skrilla]

I would hold off until after the trade deadline on Tuesday, just to see if he goes anywhere.
If he stays put, I would trade him for Chambers.

 

[SampSon]

Yes.
Chambers puts up more consistant numbers than moss.

 

[imported_Mike]

Considering you don't really need either with the other 3 WR you have, I would still do it to cover your byes. Moss sucks balls.

 

[scarfase99]

i just pulled the trigger on the trade...with a slight change:
Moss & Balitmore's defense, for Chambers & Chicago's Defense

 

[vi edit]

As said, wait till after the trade deadline. Moss might end up going someplace where he could actually have an impact. Baltimore would be a good spot for him. NE would also be interesting.

 

[2Xtreme21]

Good call on adding Chi's D.

 

[scarfase99]

i agree with ya Vi, but i couldn't pass up the chance just in case Moss didn't get traded. i think (hope) i actually got an upgrade to one of my #1 starters (Defense), and lost Moss, who would never have played in front of my studs.

appreciate all the feedback guys, keep em comin ;-)

 

[yosuke188]

Originally posted by: scarfase99
i just pulled the trigger on the trade...with a slight change:
Moss & Balitmore's defense, for Chambers & Chicago's Defense

Definitely a good trade :thumbsup:

 

[yowolabi]

Originally posted by: scarfase99
i just pulled the trigger on the trade...with a slight change:
Moss & Balitmore's defense, for Chambers & Chicago's Defense

Now that's a good trade. Chicago's D will also be good for years to come. Very young and everyone is under contract except for Briggs.

Otherwise I would have said to reject the trade. You don't need moss or chambers right now, and moss has more upside long term. All it takes is for him to be traded to the right team, and he's once again one of the top WR in football.

 

[Tylanner]

moss fell off a ****** cliff when he left MIN

I stuck with him last year and this year but it is looking very very poor

 

[vi edit]

Ok, now that you have CHI D, the deal was a no brainer. Well done. Right now, Baltimore has scored more than Chicago(not counting tonights game), but I think that Chicago has a more favorible remainin schedule.

 

[eits]

my advice = it doesn't matter.... BUT, if you did care, check to see who each team has left on their schedule and go with whatever team has the easier schedule.

 

[scarfase99]

the important thing for me is playoffs (i'm 5-0 right now, so i'm pretty much in no matter what).....

Baltimore's week 13-16 schedule is as follows: @ Cinci, @ Kansas City, vs Cleveland, and then FOR THE FINALS, @ Pittsburgh

Chicago's is vs Minny, @ St.Louis MNF, vs Tampa, and @ Detroit for the finals!!!!! :-D

;-)

 

[sash1]

Originally posted by: scarfase99
the important thing for me is playoffs (i'm 5-0 right now, so i'm pretty much in no matter what).....

Baltimore's week 13-16 schedule is as follows: @ Cinci, @ Kansas City, vs Cleveland, and then FOR THE FINALS, @ Pittsburgh

Chicago's is vs Minny, @ St.Louis MNF, vs Tampa, and @ Detroit for the finals!!!!! :-D

;-)

that pretty much spells championship right there

 

[imported_Mike]

Originally posted by: sash1

Originally posted by: scarfase99
the important thing for me is playoffs (i'm 5-0 right now, so i'm pretty much in no matter what).....

Baltimore's week 13-16 schedule is as follows: @ Cinci, @ Kansas City, vs Cleveland, and then FOR THE FINALS, @ Pittsburgh

Chicago's is vs Minny, @ St.Louis MNF, vs Tampa, and @ Detroit for the finals!!!!! :-D

;-)

that pretty much spells championship right there

Except that if Chicago clinches the division and has an outstanding record, most of their starters won't play the last few games, especially against Det. If they're 12-3 or 13-2 even, they're not going to risk an injury playing the Lions....