Hey,
I used to know everything I needed about memory & fsb speed, back in the DDR & Athlon XP days... back when picking the optimal memory speed was as easy as my ex.
But I've been out of the game lately...
I've been looking at swapping memory around in some of my employer's computers, and need to confirm some details. We are removing some computers that are EOL, and I want to save the memory to upgrade other computers. (Obviously, overclocking is not a concern at all)
I've researched and found some of the information I need. However, a lot of the stuff I've read was dated in 2006, 2007... So it's hard to discern if any of it is now inaccurate.
So... DDR2 is Double Data Rate (Duh) while the newer Intel CPUs are Quad Data Rate.
So my understanding... is that, for example...
An 800Mhz FSB cpu really is:
200Mhz x 4 = 800mhz FSB
200Mhz x 2 = 400mhz memory.
So theoretically, DDR2-400/PC2-3200 would be the matched speed for the 800Mhz FSB cpu, running at half the speed. Correct?
I've heard it stated that increasing the memory speed doesn't make much difference until you get to the synchronous state, so that would be DDR2-800/PC2-6400. But I've heard that it's worthwhile to bump up one rating, in this case DDR2-533/PC2-4200.
What is the truth to both of those statements? Is there a worthwhile benefit from running memory faster than the 2:1 ratio?
I've also read that Core 2 Duo's get a worthwhile gain from running the memory 1:1. Is that true?
I'll post a reply to this shortly with some specific details....
I used to know everything I needed about memory & fsb speed, back in the DDR & Athlon XP days... back when picking the optimal memory speed was as easy as my ex.
But I've been out of the game lately...
I've been looking at swapping memory around in some of my employer's computers, and need to confirm some details. We are removing some computers that are EOL, and I want to save the memory to upgrade other computers. (Obviously, overclocking is not a concern at all)
I've researched and found some of the information I need. However, a lot of the stuff I've read was dated in 2006, 2007... So it's hard to discern if any of it is now inaccurate.
So... DDR2 is Double Data Rate (Duh) while the newer Intel CPUs are Quad Data Rate.
So my understanding... is that, for example...
An 800Mhz FSB cpu really is:
200Mhz x 4 = 800mhz FSB
200Mhz x 2 = 400mhz memory.
So theoretically, DDR2-400/PC2-3200 would be the matched speed for the 800Mhz FSB cpu, running at half the speed. Correct?
I've heard it stated that increasing the memory speed doesn't make much difference until you get to the synchronous state, so that would be DDR2-800/PC2-6400. But I've heard that it's worthwhile to bump up one rating, in this case DDR2-533/PC2-4200.
What is the truth to both of those statements? Is there a worthwhile benefit from running memory faster than the 2:1 ratio?
I've also read that Core 2 Duo's get a worthwhile gain from running the memory 1:1. Is that true?
I'll post a reply to this shortly with some specific details....