MaverickBP
Golden Member
- Nov 18, 2004
- 1,414
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: deejayshakur
Originally posted by: MaverickBP
Originally posted by: deejayshakur
Originally posted by: Koenigsegg
Why would the Acura have better resale than the Scion?
acura's considered a luxury brand.
while both have 160hp, the scion's using a camry 2.4L whereas the rsx's is an i-vtec 2.0L. the rsx beats the tc by 0.5-1sec in the 0-60 and it looks better doing it
also remember the tc is a first year model, which deters me personally.
WTF?!?! please provide information where a similar spec'ed car would beat eachother by .5 - 1 sec. every single benchmark (mind the geek in me) has them pretty comparable with the Tc actually pulling ahead due to the greater torque. only problem is Tc is easier to induce a spin...
my bad, i guess i confused the type-s specs with the base rsx specs. you're right, the 0-60 times are pretty close: mid 7's. my gs-r still beats them both with flat 7's tho
still, the tc is about 200 lbs heavier than a base rsx (2800 vs. 3000) even if the tc does have more torque. picking one is really a matter of preference and you probably wouldn't go wrong with either. (psst, acura's warranty gives you an extra year and 14k miles plus 24 hr roadside assistance)
true but i believe they wanted a good split between luxury and speed on the Tc. They wanted people to see it and think a sporty looking camry for cheap..and the people who know whats under the hood to be intrigued. personally id shave a couple tenths off and get the Tc for comfort..im obviously not expecting a 10sec car out of it..otherwise i wouldnt get the Tc or rsx type anything.
and yes...personal choice comes into play
warranty is nice..like my mom always suggested i get a hyundai for the warranty..my response was i want a car that doesnt NEED the warranty