• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

YACT: Is the Porsche boxtser a girly car?

RichieZ

Diamond Member
I want a vert, and the cars I'm looking at are the Z4 3.0si, Boxster, SLK280, 07 3 series hardtop convertable, 07 Audi TT.


I notice a lot of chicks driving boxsters. But I think the boxster is the best looking out of the bunch.

Discuss.
 
Originally posted by: BobDaMenkey
Yes. And it say's "I'm too poor to buy a real Porsche"

/thread.

This basically covers it. It is like this whenever status symbol auto makers start making a cheap entry level car so more people can become owners. It cheapens the brand and makes the people who buy them look like status chasers without a bank account to back it up.
 
The Boxster is not a "chick" car. It's a high performance roadster, just like all of the others. It still costs almost $50,000 - people will think you have money.

Chick cars:
VW Beetle
Mini Cooper
Hyundai Tiburon
Toyota Celica (the most recent iteration)

What do these have in common? Look fast and drive slow.
 
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: BobDaMenkey
Yes. And it say's "I'm too poor to buy a real Porsche"

/thread.

This basically covers it. It is like this whenever status symbol auto makers start making a cheap entry level car so more people can become owners. It cheapens the brand and makes the people who buy them look like status chasers without a bank account to back it up.

What he said.
 
Originally posted by: sniperruff
i just look at it as a practical porsche. although i think a 350Z convertible or a S2000 will be a better value.

another vote for the S2K, imagine what he can do with the money saved.
 
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: BobDaMenkey
Yes. And it say's "I'm too poor to buy a real Porsche"

/thread.

This basically covers it. It is like this whenever status symbol auto makers start making a cheap entry level car so more people can become owners. It cheapens the brand and makes the people who buy them look like status chasers without a bank account to back it up.

actually the 'cheap' Cayman is turning heads in performance circles...

My favorites are 930 turbo and the 944 T (952)...I would have bought a 1987/88 Turbo S or 1989 Turbo if I could find one under $20k that didn't need about 1/2 that to restore fully. I do love my 1998 240SX SE though....just need to turbo-charge it now. 🙂

My brother is about to buy a 993 (Carrera 2). Many think that is a 'fake' too, considering the turbo is easily 50% more new and used. It still turns a sub 5 sec 0-60 time though and can approach 200mph pretty close. Buying into these cars though has insane maintenance costs.

I know a few guys that have exotics and their normal maintenance is 4 figures, and god save you if you need a clutch. To paraphrase: "Never buy a car you f'k with that requires a motor out clutch replacement...not only will this bleed you, you will find nicks and scratches you know where never there."

I am done buying new cars and cars I see even weekly. With only about 2500 of my model sold in two years and even less being white and a "SE"....I have a rare car.

personally though I see most of the recent 2 seater verts as miatas. Just not a man's car to me, although I don't hate anyone with one. I am sure they are nice and fun.

 
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: BobDaMenkey
Yes. And it say's "I'm too poor to buy a real Porsche"

/thread.

This basically covers it. It is like this whenever status symbol auto makers start making a cheap entry level car so more people can become owners. It cheapens the brand and makes the people who buy them look like status chasers without a bank account to back it up.

Yes, because a $50k+ car is a "cheap entry level car." Would you say the same for a Gallardo since it's the cheapest new Lambo?

Seriously, even to comfortably afford a Boxster you still have to be fairly well off. You might be surprised to learn that there are wealthy people out there that want a fun car but don't have to buy the best of the brand; it's people like you that impose such superficial notions.
 
you're looking at the SLK280 and you're concerned that the boxster is a girly car? 😕
 
Back
Top