I think we would all agree that buying a car that was a former rental is not always a good idea because there is a high probability that it was ragged on on more than one occasion.
My question is what about cars that were leased? Do you think that people who lease vehicles are more likely to abuse them than people who purchase them? Should a car that was previously leased be priced less than a comparable vehicle that was owned?
My question is what about cars that were leased? Do you think that people who lease vehicles are more likely to abuse them than people who purchase them? Should a car that was previously leased be priced less than a comparable vehicle that was owned?
