Atomic Playboy
Lifer
- Feb 6, 2007
- 16,432
- 1
- 81
I wouldn't say that. I've had some microbrews that I found quite revolting; I'd much rather drink PBR than a sour flemish ale. However, the taste ceiling for macros is much lower than micros. You are never in your life going to find a macrobrew that I think tastes better than, or as good as, Stone's Imperial Russian Stout. Or Weihenstephaner Hefe-Weissbier. Or Trappist Rochefort 10. You just aren't. Budweiser is not going to come out with a product that is in the same stratosphere of flavor as those, and hundreds of other, microbrews.Typical person saying a micro is automatically better than a macro.I've tasted tons of shitty micros. My sister lives in Oregon the microbrew capitol if the country and she visits once a month and I give her money to bring me 10 different brews a month and sure some are very good but many are very bad. There's macros I like as well. I guess if you want to be elitist about it and only drink micros then go right ahead.
So yes, it's true that something being a microbrew does not automatically make it better than a macro. But the best microbrews are so much better than the best macrobrews that it's difficult to compare them.
Incidentally, I don't drink only microbrews. In fact, for the past few months I've been on a fairly small income, so I've been primarily drinking PBR (until medical issues caused me to quit drinking altogether). I recognize the need for cheap beer. But if money were no object, I'd probably never drink a macro again.
