XP2500+ to XP2500+ Mobile Success!!!

WobbleWobble

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2001
4,867
1
0
I went from my XP2500+ desktop chip which would only hit 2.1GHz at 1.775V (actual) to a XP2500+ mobile chip which I'm running at 2.4GHz at 1.68V (actual). Tried 2.5Ghz but that fails Prime95 after 5 1/2 hours.

I'm anal about at least passing Prime95 for at least 12 hours, so I'm running it at 2.4 currently.

- A7N8X-DX V2 motherboard

Running extremely quiet in an Antec Sonata case with 2x 120mm fans running at ~5V, 80mm Panaflo PSU fan at ~7V, my Zalman CNPS-7000A Cu at ~5V and a Zalman heatpipe. Fast yet silent, I'm loving it!
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Nice low voltage. Which barton U got? I got the $77 2400+ and was running 2400 Mhz at 1.63 actual..failed prime in hour 3..now at 1.70V testing...
 

dnuggett

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2003
6,703
0
76
Originally posted by: WobbleWobble
I went from my XP2500+ desktop chip which would only hit 2.1GHz at 1.775V (actual) to a XP2500+ mobile chip which I'm running at 2.4GHz at 1.68V (actual). Tried 2.5Ghz but that fails Prime95 after 5 1/2 hours.

I'm anal about at least passing Prime95 for at least 12 hours, so I'm running it at 2.4 currently.

- A7N8X-DX V2 motherboard

Running extremely quiet in an Antec Sonata case with 2x 120mm fans running at ~5V, 80mm Panaflo PSU fan at ~7V, my Zalman CNPS-7000A Cu at ~5V and a Zalman heatpipe. Fast yet silent, I'm loving it!



So are you Prime stable for at least 12 hours @ 2.4?
 

WobbleWobble

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2001
4,867
1
0
I don't have the stepping handy, but I did take a pic of it and I'll read it off later.

Yes, it's Prime95 stable for at 2.4 for... I think I ran it over 16 hours.
 

ScrewFace

Banned
Sep 21, 2002
3,812
0
0
I'm definately getting myself a Atlon XP 2500+ Mobile chip in the near future. It looks like I can get it to around 2.8 Ghz at 2.15 volts. And, I've never had a CPU with a 512 KB L2 cache.:beer::)
 

gistech1978

Diamond Member
Aug 30, 2002
5,047
0
0
Originally posted by: ScrewFace
I'm definately getting myself a Atlon XP 2500+ Mobile chip in the near future. It looks like I can get it to around 2.8 Ghz at 2.15 volts. And, I've never had a CPU with a 512 KB L2 cache.:beer::)

better get it quick
newegg was 95 dollars last night.
i think the price has been going up, but i swear they were cheaper than that last week.
 

WobbleWobble

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2001
4,867
1
0
Originally posted by: ScrewFace
I'm definately getting myself a Atlon XP 2500+ Mobile chip in the near future. It looks like I can get it to around 2.8 Ghz at 2.15 volts. And, I've never had a CPU with a 512 KB L2 cache.:beer::)

2.15V ?!?! :Q
 

Falloutboy

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2003
5,916
0
76
Originally posted by: WobbleWobble
Originally posted by: ScrewFace
I'm definately getting myself a Atlon XP 2500+ Mobile chip in the near future. It looks like I can get it to around 2.8 Ghz at 2.15 volts. And, I've never had a CPU with a 512 KB L2 cache.:beer::)

2.15V ?!?! :Q[

that chip be running HOT!!!
 

nippyjun

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,447
0
0
Originally posted by: WobbleWobble
I went from my XP2500+ desktop chip which would only hit 2.1GHz at 1.775V (actual) to a XP2500+ mobile chip which I'm running at 2.4GHz at 1.68V (actual). Tried 2.5Ghz but that fails Prime95 after 5 1/2 hours.

I'm anal about at least passing Prime95 for at least 12 hours, so I'm running it at 2.4 currently.

- A7N8X-DX V2 motherboard

Running extremely quiet in an Antec Sonata case with 2x 120mm fans running at ~5V, 80mm Panaflo PSU fan at ~7V, my Zalman CNPS-7000A Cu at ~5V and a Zalman heatpipe. Fast yet silent, I'm loving it!

If you can post some benchmark comarisons between your old and new chip that would be much appreciated.

 

WobbleWobble

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2001
4,867
1
0
What kind of benchmarks would you like me to run?

I don't really feel like putting back my old chip in, but what I can do is underclock it to the speeds of my old chip. The results should be the same as they're the same core.
 

nippyjun

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,447
0
0
I'm most interested in the UT2004 demo between 2.1 gig speed and 2.4 speed.

Thanks,
A.
 

WobbleWobble

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2001
4,867
1
0
I was watching the UT2004 demos and it's pretty! I wasn't expecting anything that nice.

Unfortunately my computer doesn't boot properly when I changed the multipliers. I have a feeling it's that "Uber" BIOS I'm using. I'll flash back to the Asus released BIOS and I'll get the scores tonight.
 

poohbear

Platinum Member
Mar 11, 2003
2,284
5
81
yup, it's a sweeeet chip. Overclock is in my sig. That's on air cooling w/ a slk-800 & 80mm panaflo ultra. I'm sure a sp-97 w/ a 92mm panaflo ultra/high could push this past 2600+ stable.
 

WobbleWobble

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2001
4,867
1
0
I know my chip will do 2.5GHz, 2.6 I'm not sure if it's my FSB holding me back yet. I'm willing to sacrifice a few MHz in order to run my system quiet. My system is dead silent, but very warm inside too which doesn't help...
 

WobbleWobble

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2001
4,867
1
0
UT2003 Demo benchmarks with a Radeon 9500 Pro and 1GB of RAM.

I couldn't get it to boot at 2.1GHz for some reason, but here are 1.9GHz scores.

dm-rankin
7.307205 / 63.618820 / 199.394135 fps
Score = 63.693958

as-convoy
7.558612 / 39.222324 / 71.553871 fps
Score = 39.272938

ons-torlan
3.769621 / 50.338509 / 95.175766 fps
Score = 50.398769

br-colossus
21.406961 / 84.977600 / 152.515427 fps
Score = 85.087837

ctf-bridgeoffate
27.377672 / 80.131241 / 155.711227 fps
Score = 80.246391

============================================

2.4GHz scores

dm-rankin
8.086106 / 70.135086 / 235.834488 fps
Score = 70.216537

as-convoy
10.812395 / 44.124847 / 83.498894 fps
Score = 44.201126

ons-torlan
4.052847 / 51.629879 / 108.107262 fps
Score = 51.693321

br-colossus
26.083221 / 96.456276 / 177.761292 fps
Score = 96.579926

ctf-bridgeoffate
22.737524 / 87.609421 / 173.501892 fps
Score = 87.716484
 

JimRaynor

Golden Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,593
0
0
There's nothing anal about testing with Prime95 for 12 hours. Letting the system run that overnight is an excellent test of stability. If you can do it you can truly say that you have reached a great overclock that is stable. Most people, however, overclock and then run prime95 for a few minutes and call that "stable." My favorite is when people can't run prime95 without errors overclocked but it works fine at stock speeds--then they say that it's Prime95's fault and point to the other benchmarks they passed ok...